MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Mercedes-Benz CLS 2016: MOT failure rate for its age

17.0% of 12,884 MOT tests of the Mercedes-Benz CLS first registered in 2016 failed at the first attempt (2019–2024; retests excluded). Against this model's own normal rate at the same ages the index is 94.1 (95% CI 90.1–98.0; 100 = normal for this model at that age): the 2016 Mercedes-Benz CLS fails less often than other build years of the same model at the same age.

Mercedes-Benz CLS built in 2016 at a glance
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Failed first time17.0%all ages tested2019–202412884
Index against this model at the same age (95% CI 90.1–98.0)94.1index100 = normal for this model at that age2019–202412884
Rank among this model's 16 build years4of 161 = fails least for its age2019–202412884
Tested in 20242106testsmedian 67,046 miles20242106
line · Mercedes-Benz CLS built 2016 · first-time MOT failure share by age · built 2016 14.7% vs model normal 15% at age 3 · 2019–2024
Built 2016 against Mercedes-Benz CLS normal for the age: first-time MOT failure share at each age, age 3: 14.7% vs 15%; age 4: 15.1% vs 15.9%; age 5: 15.6% vs 17.4%; age 6: 17.5% vs 18.9%; age 7: 18.7% vs 20.4%; age 8: 20.8% vs 21.1%. Axis from 0% to 30%. DVSA MOT bulk data, 2019–2024.

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · page updated 30 Sep 2026 · full dataset (v5).

How does the 2016 Mercedes-Benz CLS fail at each age?

Cars built in 2016 were tested at ages 3 to 8 between 2019 and 2024. Each row compares their first-time failure share with what this model normally shows at that age, after allowing for the overall failure level of each test year.

Mercedes-Benz CLS built 2016: first-time MOT failure by age, against the model's normal rate at that age (2019–2024)
AgeTestsFailed, %95% intervalNormal for this model at that age, %Index (100 = normal)
32,15614.713.2–16.21597.9
42,12515.113.6–16.715.994.9
52,17815.614.1–17.117.489.5
62,16317.515.9–19.118.992.7
72,15618.717.1–20.420.491.4
82,10620.819.1–22.521.198.4

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 12,884 (initial tests) · Method: normal rate = this model's first-time failure share at that age across its build years (cells of 400+ tests), adjusted for each test year's overall level; cells of 30+ tests, under 500 marked rough · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What fails most on the 2016 Mercedes-Benz CLS?

The most common failure group on cars built in 2016 is tyres: 13.5 items per 100 first tests, against 14.2 across all build years of the Mercedes-Benz CLS. These counts are not age-adjusted: cars built in 2016 were tested at ages 3 to 8.

Failure items per 100 first tests, Mercedes-Benz CLS built 2016 against the Mercedes-Benz CLS in all build years (2019–2024, not age-adjusted)
Failure groupBuilt 2016, per 100All build years, per 100Items
Tyres13.514.21,740
Brakes3.610.6463
Visibility2.94.9371
Suspension2.512.7327
Noise, emissions and leaks1.72.6214

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 12,884 (initial tests of this build year) · Method: failure items grouped by DVSA's top-level defect groups, per 100 initial tests; groups with 30+ items · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does 2016 compare with the years around it?

Among the 16 published build years of the Mercedes-Benz CLS, 2016 ranks 4 (1 = fails least for its age). 2015: index 97.4. 2017: index 92.9.

Mercedes-Benz CLS build years: index against the model at the same age (2019–2024)
Build yearIndex (100 = normal)95% intervalVerdictTests
200591.687.4–95.7better6,373
2006100.196.8–103.4no different10,469
2007103.4100.3–106.6worse12,036
2008106.5102.7–110.2worse9,097
2009111.6107.0–116.1worse6,672
2010109.2103.9–114.5worse4,751
201185.580.8–90.2better5,120
201296.091.2–100.8no different6,303
2013105.0101.9–108.0worse19,319
2014102.898.7–106.9no different11,141
201597.494.1–100.6no different17,798
201694.190.1–98.0better12,884
201792.987.8–98.0better8,102
201894.887.4–102.3no different4,088
2019107.098.1–116.0no different (rough estimate)3,376
2020153.9127.0–180.7worse (rough estimate)572

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 138,101 (initial tests) · Method: observed failures against those expected for the same model at the same ages, test-year level adjusted; verdict follows the printed one-decimal bound · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Mercedes-Benz CLS 2016 MOT statistics (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 30 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/mercedes-cls/2016/

How every figure is calculated: methodology. Age, test year and build year are tied together (age = test year − build year), so the test-year level is taken as observed, not estimated.

Other pages for this model

Mercedes-Benz CLS 2005 · Mercedes-Benz CLS 2006 · Mercedes-Benz CLS 2007 · Mercedes-Benz CLS 2008 · Mercedes-Benz CLS 2009 · Mercedes-Benz CLS 2010 · Mercedes-Benz CLS 2011 · Mercedes-Benz CLS 2012 · Mercedes-Benz CLS 2013 · Mercedes-Benz CLS 2014 · Mercedes-Benz CLS 2015 · Mercedes-Benz CLS 2017 · Mercedes-Benz CLS 2018 · Mercedes-Benz CLS 2019 · Mercedes-Benz CLS 2020 · Mercedes-Benz CLS in Finland · Mercedes-Benz CLS in the Netherlands · Mercedes-Benz CLS by postcode area · Mercedes-Benz CLS body, chassis and structure failures · Mercedes-Benz CLS brakes failures · Mercedes-Benz CLS vehicle identification failures · Mercedes-Benz CLS lamps, reflectors and electrics failures · Mercedes-Benz CLS noise, emissions and leaks failures · Mercedes-Benz CLS road wheels failures · Mercedes-Benz CLS seat belts and airbags failures · Mercedes-Benz CLS steering failures · Mercedes-Benz CLS suspension failures · Mercedes-Benz CLS tyres failures · Mercedes-Benz CLS visibility failures