MOT Risk Index.co.uk

MCC Smart MOT pass rate and common problems

69.5% of MCC Smarts passed the 2024 MOT (a rough estimate from 855 first tests): 62.1% at the first attempt and 7.4% after a fix at the test centre (PRS). About 2 in 5 failed the first attempt. For its age, it fails 9% less often than normal: MOT Risk Index 91.4 (95% CI 83.7–99.4; 100 = normal).

MCC Smart at a glance, 2024 MOT
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
MOT pass rate69.5%incl. 7.4% fixed at the test centre2024855
Passed at the first attempt62.1%all first tests2024855
MOT Risk Index (95% CI 83.7–99.4)91.4index100 = normal for its age · rank 361 (tied) of 761 (1 = fails least for its age)2024855
Biggest excess: Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment49.5per 10040.4 same-age2019–20247894
Dangerous defects10.9per 10011.2 UK, not age-adjusted2019–20247894
Advisory items166.4per 100127.1 UK, not age-adjusted2019–20247894
strip · MCC Smart · MOT Risk Index · 91.4 vs 100 = normal · 2024
MOT Risk Index · MCC Smart. 0–240; 100 = normal for its age; median model 92.8 · rank 361 (tied) of 761 (1 = fails least for its age). It would rank between 297 and 453 anywhere within its 95% interval, other models held where they are. DVSA, 2024.
MCC Smart index position among 761 models
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Rank361of 761published models, 1 = fails least for its age2024855
Best rank within its 95% interval297rankother models held where they are2024855
Worst rank within its 95% interval453rankother models held where they are2024855

Check this car by registration

Before you submit. Enter a UK registration to compare this vehicle with similar cars. We send the registration to the DVSA MOT History API, do not put it in the URL or send it to analytics, and keep any server-side cache for no more than 15 minutes. MOT history is free on GOV.UK; we do not sell it. Statistical information, not vehicle condition advice. Read how we use your data.

Download this page's numbers (CSV) · How to cite

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · full dataset (v5). This model's index changed from 96.4 to 91.4 in the 24 September 2026 release, after duplicate test records were removed.

What actually fails on a MCC Smart MOT, and how often?

MCC Smart MOTs fail most often on ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’: 49.5 per 100 tests, against 40.4 for UK cars of the same age (2019–2024, n = 7,894).

bar · MCC Smart · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment · 49.5 vs 40.4 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment49.5per 10040.42019–20243905
Suspension19.5per 10032.52019–20241539
Brakes16per 10025.22019–20241266
Noise, emissions and leaks15.1per 1009.72019–20241193
Visibility14.8per 10013.32019–20241168
Body, chassis, structure8.4per 10015.92019–2024667

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 7,894 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Will my MCC Smart's advisory become a fail at the next MOT?

MCC Smart advisories turn into fails more often than on the median model: suspension advisories became a fail at the next MOT 16.1% of the time.

funnel · MCC Smart · Suspension · 16.1 vs median model · 2019–2024
Advisories on suspension: 16.1 of 100 became a fail on the same item at the next MOT. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Suspension16.1% next failmedian model2019–20241154
Brakes12.4% next failmedian model2019–20241652
Noise, emissions and leaks12.3% next failmedian model2019–2024658
Tyres11.2% next failmedian model2019–20241092

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 855 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

My MCC Smart got an MOT advisory: what gets flagged most?

MCC Smart MOTs flag brakes most: 51.2 advisories per 100 tests, against 34.7 across UK tests (2019–2024, n = 7,894).

bar · MCC Smart · Brakes · 51.2 vs 34.7 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Brakes51.2per 10034.72019–20244038
Suspension36.5per 10026.22019–20242885
Tyres32.3per 10039.72019–20242547
Noise, emissions and leaks12.8per 1005.22019–20241012
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment12.5per 1002.82019–2024989
Body, chassis, structure5.5per 1004.62019–2024431

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 7,894 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What is likely to fail next on a MCC Smart?

For MCC Smarts aged 15 to 19 whose last MOT was a fail, the item most likely to fail at the next MOT is ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’: 29.2% failed on it (2019–2024, n = 1,891).

bar · MCC Smart · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 105 cars) · 17.1 vs baseline · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 105 cars)17.1% next fail2019–2024105
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 105 cars)10.5% next fail2019–2024105
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 105 cars)4.8% next fail2019–2024105
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 123 cars)19.5% next fail2019–2024123
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 123 cars)8.9% next fail2019–2024123
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 123 cars)7.3% next fail2019–2024123
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 123 cars)6.5% next fail2019–2024123
Steering, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 123 cars)4.9% next fail2019–2024123
Full table
Further values · 2019–2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Tyres, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 123 cars)4.1% next fail2019–2024123
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 120 cars)25.8% next fail2019–2024120
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 120 cars)10.8% next fail2019–2024120
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 120 cars)8.3% next fail2019–2024120
Tyres, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 120 cars)6.7% next fail2019–2024120
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 120 cars)5.8% next fail2019–2024120
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass18.1% next fail2019–20241449
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass11.3% next fail2019–20241449
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass9.7% next fail2019–20241449
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass7.2% next fail2019–20241449
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass6.9% next fail2019–20241449
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass5.5% next fail2019–20241449
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass3.7% next fail2019–20241449
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass3.2% next fail2019–20241449
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass1.7% next fail2019–20241449
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory26.1% next fail2019–20241230
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory15.2% next fail2019–20241230
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory12.0% next fail2019–20241230
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory10.2% next fail2019–20241230
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory9.5% next fail2019–20241230
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory7.5% next fail2019–20241230
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory6.3% next fail2019–20241230
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory4.8% next fail2019–20241230
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory1.5% next fail2019–20241230
Identification of the vehicle, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory0.8% next fail2019–20241230
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail29.2% next fail2019–20241891
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail14.9% next fail2019–20241891
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail13.3% next fail2019–20241891
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail11.6% next fail2019–20241891
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail10.9% next fail2019–20241891
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail9.0% next fail2019–20241891
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail6.0% next fail2019–20241891
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail4.7% next fail2019–20241891
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail2.6% next fail2019–20241891
Identification of the vehicle, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail1.2% next fail2019–20241891
Road wheels, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail0.3% next fail2019–20241891
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 311 cars)15.4% next fail2019–2024311
Suspension, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 311 cars)9% next fail2019–2024311
Visibility, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 311 cars)8.7% next fail2019–2024311
Brakes, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 311 cars)7.7% next fail2019–2024311
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 311 cars)6.4% next fail2019–2024311
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 311 cars)5.1% next fail2019–2024311
Steering, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 311 cars)4.2% next fail2019–2024311
Tyres, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 311 cars)3.9% next fail2019–2024311
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 311 cars)1.9% next fail2019–2024311
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after an advisory (rough estimate: 220 cars)27.3% next fail2019–2024220
Suspension, 20 years or older, after an advisory (rough estimate: 220 cars)13.6% next fail2019–2024220
Visibility, 20 years or older, after an advisory (rough estimate: 220 cars)12.3% next fail2019–2024220
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after an advisory (rough estimate: 220 cars)11.8% next fail2019–2024220
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after an advisory (rough estimate: 220 cars)10.4% next fail2019–2024220
Brakes, 20 years or older, after an advisory (rough estimate: 220 cars)8.6% next fail2019–2024220
Tyres, 20 years or older, after an advisory (rough estimate: 220 cars)8.6% next fail2019–2024220
Steering, 20 years or older, after an advisory (rough estimate: 220 cars)7.7% next fail2019–2024220
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 370 cars)28.9% next fail2019–2024370
Visibility, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 370 cars)14.6% next fail2019–2024370
Suspension, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 370 cars)13.0% next fail2019–2024370
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 370 cars)11.9% next fail2019–2024370
Brakes, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 370 cars)9.5% next fail2019–2024370
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 370 cars)9.2% next fail2019–2024370
Tyres, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 370 cars)7.8% next fail2019–2024370
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 370 cars)3.5% next fail2019–2024370
Steering, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 370 cars)3.2% next fail2019–2024370

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 855 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How often does a MCC Smart get a dangerous MOT defect?

The MCC Smart gets a dangerous defect about as often as the UK average: 10.9 per 100 first tests against 11.2 across the UK. In the same tests, 109.3 major and 20.6 minor defects were recorded per 100 tests (one test can record several).

bullet · MCC Smart · Dangerous defects · 10.9 vs 11.2 · 2019–2024
Dangerous defects: 10.9 vs 11.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Dangerous defects10.9per 10011.22019–20247894

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 7,894 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id; severity not recorded for some 2018–2021 tests · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Will my MCC Smart still pass its MOT in a few years?

First-time MOT failures for the MCC Smart go from 33.3% at age 18 (rough estimate: 54 tests, 95% interval 22.2–46.6%) to 32.5% at age 19 (rough estimate: 83 tests, 95% interval 23.4–43.2%), against 43.5% for all cars aged 19 (rough estimate: 83 tests, 95% interval 23.4–43.2%) (2024, n = 855).

line · MCC Smart · Age 18 (rough estimate: 54 tests, 95% interval 22.2–46.6%) · 33.3 vs 43.9 · 2024
Age 18 (rough esti: 33.3. Age 19 (rough esti: 32.5. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 18 (rough estimate: 54 tests, 95% interval 22.2–46.6%)33.3% failed first time43.9202454
Age 19 (rough estimate: 83 tests, 95% interval 23.4–43.2%)32.5% failed first time43.5202483

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 855 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does the MCC Smart compare with cars of its own age and size?

At every age shown, MCC Smarts fail first time no more often than comparable models of the same size class; the biggest difference is at age 15, where they fail less often: 31.4% against 47.9% (2024, n = 261).

line · MCC Smart · Age 14 · 36.1 vs 45.9 · 2024
Age 14: 36.1. Age 20: 39.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 1436.1% fail45.92024180
Age 1531.4% fail47.92024261
Age 1639.3% fail50.02024732
Age 1741.8% fail50.520241535
Age 1842.2% fail50.920241492
Age 1945.0% fail50.420241261
Age 2039.2% fail49.620241020

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 855 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which MCC Smart years should I avoid?

MCC Smart build years range from index 60.9 to 98.4 against the model's own age norm of 100 (2019–2024, n = 855).

bar · MCC Smart · Build year 2001 (rough estimate: 663 tests, 95% interval 87.1–109.6) · 98.3 vs 100 = normal · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Build year 2001 (rough estimate: 663 tests, 95% interval 87.1–109.6)98.3index vs own age100 = normal2019–2024663
Build year 2002 (rough estimate: 3,085 tests, 95% interval 93.2–103.7)98.4index vs own age100 = normal2019–20243085
Build year 2003 (rough estimate: 2,014 tests, 95% interval 91.2–104.2)97.7index vs own age100 = normal2019–20242014
Build year 2004 (better for its age) (rough estimate: 461 tests, 95% interval 70.8–96.4)83.6index vs own age100 = normal2019–2024461
Build year 2005 (better for its age) (rough estimate: 353 tests, 95% interval 48.5–73.2)60.9index vs own age100 = normal2019–2024353

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 855 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How much does it cost to fix a MCC Smart MOT fail?

Expected repair cost per MCC Smart MOT: about £159 (up to about £301 if more expensive parts are needed), from the chance of failing each item and its most common UK repair price (catalogue estimate, n = 855).

Computed, not measured.

bar · MCC Smart · Expected repair bill · 158.6 vs modal price catalogue · price catalogue
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (price catalogue)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Expected repair bill158.6GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue855
Estimated range lower158.6GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue855
Estimated range upper301.3GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue855
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment: Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)69.3GBP expected contribution140price catalogue855
Suspension: Suspension coil spring (single corner)35.1GBP expected contribution180price catalogue855
Noise, emissions and leaks: Exhaust rear silencer30.2GBP expected contribution200price catalogue855
Brakes: Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)24GBP expected contribution150price catalogue855

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: price catalogue · n = 855 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the MCC Smart more reliable than similar cars?

Of 8 similar models, 2 fail less often for their age than the MCC Smart and 6 as often or more. The MCC Smart has an MOT Risk Index of 91.4, where 100 = normal for its age (2024, n = 855).

bar · MCC Smart · MCC Smart (this model) · 91.4 vs 100 = normal · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
MCC Smart (this model)91.4index100 = normal2024855
Daihatsu Charade98.1index91.420241241
Nissan Figaro92.7index91.420242413
Renault Wind102.4index91.420242065
SEAT Arosa103index91.420242025
Skoda Scala90.9index91.420247954
Smart City-Coupe98.6index91.420244878
Fiat Seicento112.3index91.420241322
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Smart Roadster72.3index91.420241584

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 855 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many miles does a MCC Smart normally do?

MCC Smart: Age 18 median (rough estimate) is 73163 miles (2024).

line · MCC Smart · Age 18 median (rough estimate) · 73163 vs baseline · 2024
Age 18 median (rou: 73163. Age 19 P75 (rough : 103156. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 18 median (rough estimate)73163miles202454
Age 19 median (rough estimate)78045miles202483
Age 19 P25 (rough estimate)60912miles202483
Age 19 P75 (rough estimate)103156miles202483

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 855 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does high mileage mean more MCC Smart MOT failures at the same age?

At ages 15+, 28.6% of MCC Smarts with under 40,000 miles failed first time, against 44.6% of those with 100,000 to 140,000 miles (2024, n = 212). No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.

bar · MCC Smart · Age 15+, <40k miles (rough estimate: 91 tests, 95% interval 20.3–38.6%) · 28.6 vs baseline · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 15+, <40k miles (rough estimate: 91 tests, 95% interval 20.3–38.6%)28.6% failed first time202491
Age 15+, 40-70k miles (rough estimate: 299 tests, 95% interval 30.9–41.7%)36.1% failed first time2024299
Age 15+, 70-100k miles (rough estimate: 309 tests, 95% interval 33.9–44.7%)39.2% failed first time2024309
Age 15+, 100-140k miles (rough estimate: 121 tests, 95% interval 36.1–53.5%)44.6% failed first time2024121

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 855 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many miles does a MCC Smart last?

15.7% of MCC Smarts tested had reached 100,000 miles, and 1.7% had reached 150,000 (2024, n = 1,228).

line · MCC Smart · 100,000 miles · 15.7 vs baseline · 2024
100,000 miles: 15.7. 200,000 miles (rou: 0.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
100,000 miles15.7% of tested cars20241228
150,000 miles (rough estimate: 133 tests, 95% interval 1.4–2.0%)1.7% of tested cars2024133
200,000 miles (rough estimate: 18 tests, 95% interval 0.1–0.4%)0.2% of tested cars202418

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 855 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the MCC Smart driven more or less than average, and does that change the picture?

Matched on annual mileage as well as age, the MCC Smart index is 100.7, against 93.0 on age alone (2019–2024, n = 855).

slope · MCC Smart · Age and mileage adjusted index · 100.7 vs 93 · 2019–2024
Age and mileage adjusted index: 93 vs 100.7. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age and mileage adjusted index100.7index932019–2024855

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 855 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Where in Britain does the MCC Smart fail its MOT most?

MCC Smart fails first-time MOTs most in Brighton (BN): 52.5% against 41.3% across Britain for this model, both 2019–2024 (2024, n = 143).

bar · MCC Smart · Brighton (BN) (rough estimate: 143 tests, 95% interval 44.3–60.5%) · 52.5 vs 37.9 · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Brighton (BN) (rough estimate: 143 tests, 95% interval 44.3–60.5%)52.5% fail first time37.92024143
Gloucester (GL) (rough estimate: 164 tests, 95% interval 43.6–58.8%)51.2% fail first time37.92024164
Medway (ME) (rough estimate: 173 tests, 95% interval 42.3–57.1%)49.7% fail first time37.92024173
Leicester (LE) (rough estimate: 111 tests, 95% interval 22.0–38.8%)29.7% fail first time37.92024111
London SE (SE) (rough estimate: 142 tests, 95% interval 25.9–41.2%)33.1% fail first time37.92024142
Peterborough (PE) (rough estimate: 145 tests, 95% interval 26.0–41.1%)33.1% fail first time37.92024145
Bristol (BS) (rough estimate: 239 tests, 95% interval 41.5–54.0%)47.7% fail first time37.92024239
Portsmouth (PO) (rough estimate: 232 tests, 95% interval 41.1–53.8%)47.4% fail first time37.92024232
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Bournemouth (BH) (rough estimate: 154 tests, 95% interval 39.7–55.3%)47.4% fail first time37.92024154
Truro (TR) (rough estimate: 110 tests, 95% interval 38.2–56.5%)47.3% fail first time37.92024110
Bath (BA) (rough estimate: 113 tests, 95% interval 38.0–56.1%)46.9% fail first time37.92024113
Northampton (NN) (rough estimate: 117 tests, 95% interval 37.4–55.2%)46.1% fail first time37.92024117
Exeter (EX) (rough estimate: 148 tests, 95% interval 38.1–54.0%)46.0% fail first time37.92024148
Tonbridge (TN) (rough estimate: 146 tests, 95% interval 38.0–54.0%)45.9% fail first time37.92024146
Guildford (GU) (rough estimate: 125 tests, 95% interval 35.6–52.8%)44% fail first time37.92024125
Cardiff (CF) (rough estimate: 120 tests, 95% interval 34.8–52.3%)43.3% fail first time37.92024120
Plymouth (PL) (rough estimate: 166 tests, 95% interval 35.5–50.4%)42.8% fail first time37.92024166
Nottingham (NG) (rough estimate: 131 tests, 95% interval 33.9–50.5%)42.0% fail first time37.92024131
Twickenham (TW) (rough estimate: 127 tests, 95% interval 32.0–48.9%)40.2% fail first time37.92024127
Norwich (NR) (rough estimate: 140 tests, 95% interval 31.6–47.6%)39.3% fail first time37.92024140
London E (E) (rough estimate: 108 tests, 95% interval 30.2–48.3%)38.9% fail first time37.92024108
Chelmsford (CM) (rough estimate: 105 tests, 95% interval 29.4–47.7%)38.1% fail first time37.92024105
London N (N) (rough estimate: 105 tests, 95% interval 28.5–46.7%)37.1% fail first time37.92024105
Coventry (CV) (rough estimate: 108 tests, 95% interval 28.5–46.4%)37.0% fail first time37.92024108
Southend-on-Sea (SS) (rough estimate: 114 tests, 95% interval 28.5–46.0%)36.8% fail first time37.92024114
Southampton (SO) (rough estimate: 107 tests, 95% interval 27.9–45.9%)36.5% fail first time37.92024107
Sheffield (S) (rough estimate: 125 tests, 95% interval 27.4–43.9%)35.2% fail first time37.92024125
Birmingham (B) (rough estimate: 235 tests, 95% interval 27.9–39.9%)33.6% fail first time37.92024235

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 855 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does a MCC Smart rust more than average?

Allowing for age, MCC Smart MOTs record corrosion failures at 1.9 times the national rate: 1.47% of tests against 0.77% (2024 + geographic layers, n = 854).

Computed, not measured.

slope · MCC Smart · Salt belt susceptibility · 1.9 vs 1 · 2024 + geographic layers
Salt belt susceptibility: 1 vs 1.9. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (2024 + geographic layers)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Salt belt susceptibility1.9ratio estimate12024 + geographic layers854

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 + geographic layers · n = 855 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is a MCC Smart ULEZ compliant?

An estimated 6.6% of MCC Smarts tested are likely ULEZ-compliant, judged from fuel type and first-use date; check a specific car with TfL's vehicle checker (2024).

Computed, not measured.

stacked · MCC Smart · Likely compliant · 6.6 vs baseline · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Likely compliant6.6% estimate2024855

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 855 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What do six years of MOTs show about owning a MCC Smart?

Of failed MCC Smart MOTs, 26.9% were retested the same day and a further 66.7% within 10 days; the median failed car passed its retest after 2 days (2019–2024, n = 2,087).

bar · MCC Smart · Same-day retest · 26.9 vs failed initial tests · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Same-day retest26.9%failed initial tests2019–20242087
Retest within 10 days66.7%failed initial tests2019–20242087
Clean MOT streak26.6%observed chains2019–20241424
Repeat advisory34.1%observed chains2019–20241424
Decreasing odometer3.2% mileage anomalyobserved chains2019–20241729

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 855 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

If a MCC Smart fails, does it fail again?

39.8% of MCC Smarts that failed an MOT failed the next one too, against 35.4% after a pass (2019–2024, n = 756). The failure most likely to come back is ‘body, chassis, structure’: 42.2% of those fails recurred at the next MOT.

bullet · MCC Smart · Repeat after fail · 39.8 vs 35.4 · 2019–2024
Repeat after fail: 39.8 vs 35.4. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Repeat after fail39.8%35.42019–2024756

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 855 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which MCC Smart faults come together?

On MCC Smarts, ‘body, chassis, structure’ and ‘noise, emissions and leaks’ failures turn up together 3.8 times as often as chance would predict (2024, n = 200).

MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Body, chassis, structure + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 200 tests, 95% interval 3.3–4.3)3.8liftexpected joint rate2024200
Steering + Suspension (rough estimate: 161 tests, 95% interval 2.9–3.9)3.4liftexpected joint rate2024161
Body, chassis, structure + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 39 tests, 95% interval 2.4–4.5)3.3liftexpected joint rate202439
Noise, emissions and leaks + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 51 tests, 95% interval 2.5–4.3)3.3liftexpected joint rate202451
Identification of the vehicle + Visibility (rough estimate: 20 tests, 95% interval 1.9–4.9)3.2liftexpected joint rate202420
Identification of the vehicle + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (rough estimate: 40 tests, 95% interval 2.2–4.2)3.1liftexpected joint rate202440
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Visibility (rough estimate: 58 tests, 95% interval 2.3–3.9)3.0liftexpected joint rate202458
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Tyres (rough estimate: 28 tests, 95% interval 2.0–4.3)3liftexpected joint rate202428
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Body, chassis, structure + Visibility (rough estimate: 187 tests, 95% interval 2.5–3.3)2.9liftexpected joint rate2024187
Body, chassis, structure + Tyres (rough estimate: 89 tests, 95% interval 2.2–3.4)2.8liftexpected joint rate202489
Body, chassis, structure + Brakes (rough estimate: 147 tests, 95% interval 2.4–3.3)2.8liftexpected joint rate2024147
Brakes + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 43 tests, 95% interval 2.0–3.7)2.8liftexpected joint rate202443
Body, chassis, structure + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (rough estimate: 363 tests, 95% interval 2.4–3.0)2.7liftexpected joint rate2024363
Body, chassis, structure + Suspension (rough estimate: 202 tests, 95% interval 2.3–3.1)2.7liftexpected joint rate2024202
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 106 tests, 95% interval 2.2–3.3)2.7liftexpected joint rate2024106
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Suspension (rough estimate: 59 tests, 95% interval 2.0–3.5)2.7liftexpected joint rate202459
Brakes + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 183 tests, 95% interval 2.3–3.0)2.6liftexpected joint rate2024183
Tyres + Visibility (rough estimate: 135 tests, 95% interval 2.2–3.1)2.6liftexpected joint rate2024135
Brakes + Suspension (rough estimate: 253 tests, 95% interval 2.3–2.9)2.6liftexpected joint rate2024253
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Visibility2.5liftexpected joint rate2024555
Brakes + Visibility (rough estimate: 217 tests, 95% interval 2.2–2.9)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024217
Body, chassis, structure + Steering (rough estimate: 65 tests, 95% interval 1.9–3.2)2.5liftexpected joint rate202465
Noise, emissions and leaks + Tyres (rough estimate: 104 tests, 95% interval 2.0–3.0)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024104
Noise, emissions and leaks + Visibility (rough estimate: 211 tests, 95% interval 2.1–2.8)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024211
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Tyres (rough estimate: 260 tests, 95% interval 2.1–2.8)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024260
Noise, emissions and leaks + Suspension (rough estimate: 239 tests, 95% interval 2.1–2.8)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024239
Suspension + Tyres (rough estimate: 143 tests, 95% interval 2.0–2.8)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024143
Brakes + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (rough estimate: 423 tests, 95% interval 2.2–2.6)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024423
Brakes + Tyres (rough estimate: 100 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.9)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024100
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 419 tests, 95% interval 2.1–2.6)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024419
Suspension + Visibility (rough estimate: 278 tests, 95% interval 2.0–2.5)2.3liftexpected joint rate2024278
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Suspension2.3liftexpected joint rate2024565
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Steering (rough estimate: 188 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.5)2.2liftexpected joint rate2024188
Noise, emissions and leaks + Steering (rough estimate: 74 tests, 95% interval 1.7–2.7)2.2liftexpected joint rate202474
Steering + Visibility (rough estimate: 90 tests, 95% interval 1.7–2.6)2.1liftexpected joint rate202490
Steering + Tyres (rough estimate: 41 tests, 95% interval 1.4–2.7)2.0liftexpected joint rate202441
Brakes + Steering (rough estimate: 66 tests, 95% interval 1.5–2.5)1.9liftexpected joint rate202466
Identification of the vehicle + Suspension (seen together; too few for a multiplier)18tests with both202418
Identification of the vehicle + Noise, emissions and leaks (seen together; too few for a multiplier)13tests with both202413
Brakes + Identification of the vehicle (seen together; too few for a multiplier)12tests with both202412
Body, chassis, structure + Identification of the vehicle (seen together; too few for a multiplier)11tests with both202411
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Steering (seen together; too few for a multiplier)10tests with both202410
Identification of the vehicle + Steering (seen together; too few for a multiplier)8tests with both20248
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Road Wheels (seen together; too few for a multiplier)8tests with both20248
Road Wheels + Suspension (seen together; too few for a multiplier)5tests with both20245

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 855 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does the month of a MCC Smart MOT matter?

MCC Smarts fail first time most in June (44.4%, against 28.1% for all cars that month) and least in December (38.0%) (2024, n = 855).

line · MCC Smart · January · 42.7 vs 31.1 · 2024
January: 42.7. December: 38.0. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MCC Smart: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
January42.7% fail first time31.12024756
February40.6% fail first time30.02024660
March40.3% fail first time28.32024747
April39.8% fail first time29.82024590
May39.8% fail first time28.82024576
June44.4% fail first time28.12024603
July42.5% fail first time29.32024708
August40.6% fail first time29.22024668
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
September41.6% fail first time28.22024721
October39.9% fail first time30.32024702
November43.5% fail first time30.62024718
December38.0% fail first time29.32024445

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 855 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Not enough tests for… (and why)

Does the MCC Smart fail inspections in other countries too?

no match in the other-country inspection register. 855 initial MCC Smart tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: Statens vegvesen PKK (CC BY 4.0), Traficom Katsastus (CC BY 4.0), RDW APK (CC0), adapted; covers 430 of 761 models · Window: 2024 by country · n = 855 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

See the Skoda Scala, a car of the same inspection class with 9.3× the tests · Check your car by registration

Real-world MPG against the official figure (manufacturer level)

layer not yet computed for this model (covers 19 of 761 models). 855 initial MCC Smart tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: European Commission OBFCM; covers 19 of 761 models · Window: 2021+ cohorts · n = 855 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

See the Skoda Scala, a car of the same inspection class with 9.3× the tests · Check your car by registration

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). MCC Smart MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 24 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/mcc-smart/

How the MOT Risk Index and every figure on this page are calculated: methodology.

Report an error

What is wrong on this page? One tap sends the category only, no text and nothing about you.

MCC Smart MOT: quick answers

What is the MCC Smart first-time MOT pass rate?

62.1% of first attempts passed in 2024 (855 tests). Retests after repair are excluded; cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) are shown separately.

Why does this number differ from other sites?

Other sites may count retests or all attempts. This page uses 855 primary tests: 37.89% failed first time and 69.5% passed when cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) count as passes. The age-adjusted MOT Risk Index 91.4 is shown separately.