Lotus Evora — MOT statistics 2024

The Lotus Evora failed 9.83% of 804 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 32.3 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 68% less often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

Age-adjusted peer: Aston Martin Rapide (index 32.2) — the two published results are 0.1 index points apart.

Lotus Evora common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Suspension is well below the reference at 1.7 per 100 tests, against 13.2 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Lotus Evora MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Tyres are highest at 20.9 per 100 tests; Non-component advisories are lowest at 1.6 per 100 tests — the gap is 19.3 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

A failed test does not clearly change next year's odds here (9.8% against 9.6%): the difference is within the margin of error. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 4,322 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Split by how much each car is driven. This is a split by annual mileage, not by body type — the MOT record does not say whether a car is a conversion. Within each band the index compares with vehicles of the same age driven as much.

Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 13.7 points — this fleet is driven less than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view flatters it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Lotus Evora compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Lotus Evora perform as it gets older?

The Evora at age 14 is well below the reference at 9.9%, against 40.4% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–45%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

How dangerous are Lotus Evora MOT failures?

Major defects are well below the reference at 14.1 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Chart values: Minor 4.4 · Major 14.1 · Dangerous 2.9.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Lotus Evora MOT matter?

Jan is highest at 14.2%; Jun is lowest at 8.1% — the gap is 6.1 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Chart scale: 7%–33%.

bars: Lotus Evora · dashed: all class-4 cars

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 6.1 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Lotus Evora average mileage by age

At age 8, the middle half of Evoras runs from 15,983 miles to 29,337 miles, against 21,528 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Does high mileage mean more Lotus Evora MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 10–14, 10% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 11.9% of those with 40,000–70,000 miles.No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

A typical 8-year-old Evora has ~21,528 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Lotus Evora fails its MOT most

Kingston upon Thames area is highest at 24.3%; Derby area is lowest at 3.0% — the gap is 21.2 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West.

Lotus Evora survival: which cars are still on the road

By age 15 is well below the reference at 22.9%, against 100.0% at the ages 4–6 reference level.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Chart axes: car age, years · survival vs ages 4–6 · scale 0–105%.

By age 15, only about 23% as many cars of this family present for MOT as at ages 4–6 (reference n≈341); survivors still fail at 16.7% vs 9.2% at age 4. Older cars that still appear are a selected subset — weaker ones have already left.

How many years is a Lotus Evora likely to last?

Bought at age 5 is highest at 9.3 years; Bought at age 15 is lowest at 0.5 years — the gap is 8.8 years.

bigger number = longer remaining lifeyears on the observed survival curve

estimateEstimate only — not a warranty: a typical 10-year-old example of this family has about 4.3 expected years of further MOT-present life on the survival curve, observed only until age 15. Derived from how many cars of each age still appear for test, not from a longitudinal panel.

Lotus Evora faults that come together

Lamps & electrical + Visibility stand out at 4.52×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Defects in «Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment» and «Visibility» appear together 4.52× more often than chance (26 co-occurrences in the same test; 78 pairs compared).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Lotus Evora MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £19.47 to £36.99, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £19 to £37, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Lotus Evora rust problems: where they corrode

Salt-belt exposure is well below the reference at 31st percentile, against 50th percentile as the middle of published models.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

This Lotus Evora has too few tests to judge for corrosion once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are gentler than most for the models we publish.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

What will fail next on a Lotus Evora?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 9-11 are highest at 11.3%; Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems after a passed at age 3-5 are lowest at 0.7% — the gap is 10.5 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Lotus Evora ownership: what six years of MOTs show

Clean three-test streak is highest at 74.1%; Repeated the same advisory is lowest at 9.6% — the gap is 64.5 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.481 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 1,656 miles a year across 830 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 74.07% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 9.58% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 1.084% of 830 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 6,836 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Lotus Evora safety recalls and how to check yours

DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 4.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

recall campaigns launched per year

DVSA lists 4 safety recall campaigns for the Lotus Evora, covering roughly 1,650 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.

Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.

Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.

Lotus Evora MOT: quick answers

Lotus Evora MOT Risk Index is well below the reference at 32.3, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Lotus Evora first-time MOT pass rate?

90.17% of first attempts passed in 2024 (804 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.

Why does this number differ from other sites?

Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 9.83% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 804 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 32.3 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Lotus Evora with other cars

Mercedes-Benz GT is highest at 33.4; Audi R8 is lowest at 30.8 — the gap is 2.6 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Lotus MOT statisticsLotus Exige MOT statsLotus Esprit MOT stats

Similar risk

Aston Martin Rapide (index 32.2)Mercedes-Benz GT (index 33.4)Audi R8 (index 30.8)

Same size class

how Fiat Coupe compareshow Bentley Turbo compareshow Mazda Eunos compares

By area

Lotus Evora MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Lotus Evora brakes failuresLotus Evora lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresLotus Evora noise, emissions and leaks failuresLotus Evora seat belts and airbags failuresLotus Evora suspension failuresLotus Evora tyres failuresLotus Evora visibility failures