MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Lexus SC — MOT statistics 2024

The Lexus SC failed 21.32% of 1,801 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 50.9 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 49% less often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

MOT risk index 50.9, 95% CI 46.5–55.6 (100 = national average) 100 50.9 0 200
Index
50.9
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
21.32%
n = 1,801
Dangerous /100
8
national ≈11
Rank
104 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Porsche Panamera (index 50.9) — the two published results are 0.0 index points apart.

Lexus SC common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment are well below the reference at 12.2 per 100 tests, against 38.5 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Lexus SC common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Lamps & electrical12.21,37838.50.32×0.30–0.33
Suspension11.61,31431.50.37×0.35–0.39
Brakes9.61,08423.90.40×0.38–0.43
Tyres7.079310.10.70×0.65–0.75
Emissions & leaks6.87729.10.75×0.70–0.80
Visibility5.663112.80.44×0.40–0.47
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 11,295 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Suspension joint dust cover severely deterioratedA suspension joint dust cover severely deteriorated3.801.902.00×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Engine MIL illuminated indicating a malfunctionEngine MIL illuminated indicating a malfunction2.901.192.45×Ask the seller about: Engine MIL illuminated indicating a malfunction
Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or…Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or the range specified by the manufacturer1.950.533.69×Ask the seller about: Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or the range s
Shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does…A shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage1.840.981.88×Ask the seller about: A shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not func
Headlamp reflector or lens slightly defectiveHeadlamp reflector or lens slightly defective1.881.091.72×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Tyre seriously damagedA tyre seriously damaged3.252.541.28×Check tyre tread depth across the full width
Lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a…A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning1.952.090.93×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the…Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen1.992.220.90×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements2.282.570.89×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn2.814.870.58×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Lexus SC MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Tyres are highest at 31.6 per 100 tests; Non-component advisories are lowest at 2.3 per 100 tests — the gap is 29.3 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Lexus SC MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Tyres31.6
Suspension27.1
Brakes22.9
Body & structure9.5
Emissions & leaks3.9
Non-component advisories2.3

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed25.4%666
It passed19.8%6,247

A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 5.6 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is noise, emissions and leaks — 30.5% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 11,266 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only54.0fails less often than expected
Age and annual mileage56.9fails less often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year17.6%a normal spread of use

Mileage changes little here (+2.9 points): this fleet is driven about as much as the vehicles it is compared with. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Lexus SC compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

AgeLexus SCSame class, same ageDifferenceTests
12 years18.95%30.56%-11.61 pp285
13 years18.49%32.63%-14.15 pp503
14 years21%34.59%-13.59 pp757
15 years22.48%36.05%-13.57 pp983
16 years24.69%37.1%-12.41 pp1,211
17 years22.98%37.5%-14.51 pp1,562
18 years25.58%37.87%-12.3 pp1,603
19 years24.12%37.48%-13.37 pp1,360
20 years25.2%37%-11.8 pp1,139

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Lexus SC perform as it gets older?

The SC at age 17 is well below the reference at 14.0%, against 43.1% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the Lexus SC perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–47%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

Data table
AgeLexus SCAll vehiclesGap
1714.0%43.1%-29.1 pp
1822.6%43.9%-21.3 pp
1915.0%43.5%-28.5 pp
2024.0%41.0%-17.1 pp

Is a Lexus SC ULEZ compliant?

The share of classifiable 2024 Lexus SC MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 27.2%.

Based on 1,787 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.

higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class

Age-band estimate from classifiable initial MOT tests
Vehicle age at testLikely ULEZ-compliant shareTests
Under 3 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
3–5 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 1
6–7 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
8 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
9 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
10–14 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
15–17 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 290
18 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 195
19 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 227
20+ years0.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 1,074

How dangerous are Lexus SC MOT failures?

Major defects are well below the reference at 38.0 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Lexus SC MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor11.5914.220.82×
Major38.0452.750.72×
Dangerous8.0811.150.72×

Chart values: Minor 11.6 · Major 38.0 · Dangerous 8.1.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Lexus SC MOT matter?

May is highest at 26.9%; Sep is lowest at 20.4% — the gap is 6.4 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Lexus SC MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 19%–33%.

bars: Lexus SC · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthLexus SCAll vehiclesGap
Jan26.07%31.12%-5.1 pp
Feb26.53%29.99%-3.5 pp
Mar24.17%28.26%-4.1 pp
Apr23.66%29.78%-6.1 pp
May26.85%28.79%-1.9 pp
Jun21.99%28.15%-6.2 pp
Jul23.02%29.33%-6.3 pp
Aug22.55%29.2%-6.6 pp
Sep20.42%28.19%-7.8 pp
Oct22.74%30.34%-7.6 pp
Nov23.04%30.58%-7.5 pp
Dec23.86%29.33%-5.5 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 6.4 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Lexus SC average mileage by age

At age 19, the middle half of SCs runs from 60,290 miles to 107,192 miles, against 84,255 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Bars: Lexus SC · dashed: all class-4 cars — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · odometer scale 0–128k mi.

Does high mileage mean more Lexus SC MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 15+, 9.3% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 29.2% of those with over 140,000 miles.Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.

Does high mileage mean more Lexus SC MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
Lexus SC: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
15+<40k miles9.3%5.6–15.1%150 (rough estimate)
15+40-70k miles15.7%12.6–19.4%440 (rough estimate)
15+70-100k miles18.9%15.9–22.4%560
15+100-140k miles29.9%25.8–34.4%441 (rough estimate)
15+140k+ miles29.2%23.3–36%195 (rough estimate)

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
1752,04068,45389,144171
1855,58273,01799,959195
1960,29084,255107,192227
20+71,58094,144121,7091,076

A typical 19-year-old SC has ~84,255 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Lexus SC fails its MOT most

Bournemouth area is highest at 35.3%; Stoke-on-Trent area is lowest at 7.1% — the gap is 28.2 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Lexus SC line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75) — 2024 UK MOT data
Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Bournemouth (BH)35.29%+11.6 pp
Exeter (EX)33.06%+9.4 pp
Hull (HU)32.69%+9.0 pp
Warrington (WA)32%+8.4 pp
Portsmouth (PO)30.52%+6.9 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
Stoke-on-Trent (ST)7.14%-16.5 pp
London SE (SE)12.12%-11.5 pp
Croydon (CR)12.61%-11.0 pp
Redhill (RH)15.04%-8.6 pp
Leicester (LE)15.46%-8.2 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 17%–29% failing.

How many miles does a Lexus SC last?

100,000+ miles is highest at 32.0%; 150,000+ miles is lowest at 6.5% — the gap is 25.5 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

OdometerTests ≥ thresholdShare of sample
100,000+ miles3,60932%
150,000+ miles7346.51%

Of 11,279 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 32.0% had reached 100k miles, 6.5% had reached 150k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.

Lexus SC faults that come together

Body & structure + Emissions & leaks stand out at 11.80×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks14911.8× (rough estimate)
BrakesNoise, emissions and leaks2115.56× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureBrakes885.51× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureVisibility454× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment783.9× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentNoise, emissions and leaks1853.89× (rough estimate)
SteeringSuspension393.8× (rough estimate)
BrakesSteering303.65× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility1523.58× (rough estimate)
BrakesLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment2063.43× (rough estimate)
BrakesVisibility1163.43× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksTyres953.39× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSteering223.39× (rough estimate)
BrakesTyres1193.36× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSuspension673.35× (rough estimate)
TyresVisibility823.28× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres1443.24× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSteering333.2× (rough estimate)
BrakesSuspension1913.18× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension2293.04× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSuspension1433.01× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureTyres352.97× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility772.88× (rough estimate)
SuspensionVisibility1202.84× (rough estimate)
SuspensionTyres1092.46× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment17too few (rough estimate)
BrakesIdentification of the vehicle15too few (rough estimate)
SteeringVisibility15too few (rough estimate)
SteeringTyres15too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSteering13too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSuspension13too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleVisibility12too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleNoise, emissions and leaks10too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksRoad Wheels8too few (rough estimate)
BrakesRoad Wheels8too few (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentRoad Wheels8too few (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems7too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleTyres6too few (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsTyres5too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSuspension5too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Body, chassis, structure» and «Noise, emissions and leaks» appear together 11.80× more often than chance (149 co-occurrences in the same test; 66 pairs compared).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Is low mileage better for a Lexus SC?

Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 16.5%, against 30.5% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

BandFail %Tests
<5k miles/year16.53%709
8–12k miles/year30.51%118
Gap (low − normal)-13.98 pp—
By fuel and age

Petrol

AgeLow-use fail %nNormal fail %nGap pp
1314.8329034.0447-19.21 pp
1417.6641928.1771-10.51 pp

At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 16.5% vs 30.5% for 8–12k miles/year — 14.0 pp lower (n_low=709, n_normal=118). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates.

Lexus SC MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £72.26 to £137.29, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£72–137
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Suspension11.6 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£20.88
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment12.2 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£17.08
Brakes9.6 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£14.40
Noise, emissions and leaks6.8 (nat. 3.67)Exhaust rear silencer£200£13.60
Tyres7.0 (nat. 8.7)Tyre (single mid-range 16" fitted)£90£6.30

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £72 to £137, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Lexus SC running costs for a fleet

Vehicles failing at age 19 stand out at 15.0%, against 14.0% at age 17, tested in the same year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fails per 100 at age 17
14
vehicles needing work (rough estimate: 171 tests)
At age 19
15
other cars of this model tested at age 19 in 2024 (rough estimate: 227 tests)
Repairs per 100
£7,226
plus £5,485 in test fees
Off the road
1d
median; 27.77% cleared same day
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
AgeFailsMedian odometerTestsGap vs age 5
1714.04%68,453171—
1822.56%73,017195—
1914.98%84,255227—

No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).

Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.

Lexus SC rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility is well below the reference at 0.38×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

How it rusts
0.38×
0.29% of tests record a corrosion defect vs 0.77% typical — age-standardised
Salt Belt exposure
35th
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 0 postcode areas

This Lexus SC fails on corrosion much less often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are about typical for the models we publish.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Lexus SC advisory become a failure?

Suspension is highest at 13.9%; Body, chassis, structure are lowest at 6.0% — the gap is 7.9 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

Lexus SC chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now — 2024 UK MOT data
Lexus SC, advisory → failure conversion by component group, chained tests 2019–2024. Chart labels and rates: Suspension 13.9% · Brakes 11.6% · Tyres 8.7% · Body & chassis 6%.
Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Suspension13.9%12.1 months2,6411,384
Brakes11.6%12 months1,9561,266
Tyres8.7%12.1 months2,6411,631
Body, chassis, structure6.0%12.3 months2,292734

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 14 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.1 months and roughly 2,641 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Lexus SC?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 12-14 are highest at 15.8%; Tyres after a passed at age 9-11 are lowest at 2.8% — the gap is 13.1 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
9-11passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 5.0% · Brakes 3.3% · Tyres 2.8%181 (rough estimate)
9-11advisoryTyres 8.9% · Suspension 6.3% · Visibility 6.3%79 (rough estimate)
12-14passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 5.8% · Suspension 5.4% · Brakes 3.5%962
12-14advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 9.0% · Suspension 7.3% · Brakes 6.3%478 (rough estimate)
12-14failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 15.8% · Suspension 11.3% · Brakes 7.6%379 (rough estimate)
15-19passedSuspension 6.5% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 4.9% · Brakes 4.5%2,778
15-19advisorySuspension 10.2% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 9.4% · Brakes 7.9%1,610
15-19failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 12.4% · Suspension 11.5% · Brakes 9.9%1,478
20+passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 5.2% · Brakes 4.4% · Noise, emissions and leaks 4.4%522
20+advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 12.6% · Suspension 12.0% · Brakes 10.0%350 (rough estimate)
20+failureSuspension 10.9% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 10.6% · Brakes 7.0%330 (rough estimate)

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Lexus SC ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 65.8%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 6.5% — the gap is 59.3 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
27.77%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
0.924
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
48.8%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
1.299%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 1,822 failures followed through to their re-test, 27.77% were repaired and passed the same day and 65.75% within ten days; the median gap is 1 day. 4,081 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.924 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 1,666 miles a year across 2,077 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 48.8% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 27.56% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 1.299% of 2,078 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 8,326 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Lexus SC MOT: quick answers

Lexus SC MOT Risk Index is well below the reference at 50.9, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Lexus SC first-time MOT pass rate?
78.68% of first attempts passed in 2024 (1,801 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 21.32% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 1,801 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 50.9 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Lexus SC with other cars

Morris Minor is highest at 51.6; Lexus SC is lowest at 50.9 — the gap is 0.7 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Lexus MOT statisticsLexus RC MOT statsLexus Es MOT stats

Similar risk

Porsche Panamera (index 50.9)Ford Capri (index 51.5)Morris Minor (index 51.6)

Same size class

how Volvo 800 Series compareshow Abarth 124 compareshow Mitsubishi Pajero compares

By area

Lexus SC MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Lexus SC body, chassis and structure failuresLexus SC brakes failuresLexus SC vehicle identification failuresLexus SC lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresLexus SC noise, emissions and leaks failuresLexus SC steering failuresLexus SC suspension failuresLexus SC tyres failuresLexus SC visibility failures


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:lexus-sc:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Lexus SC MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/lexus-sc/ · Published 2026-07-30.