MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Isuzu Rodeo MOT pass rate and common problems

62.6% of Isuzu Rodeos passed the 2024 MOT (based on 4,970 first tests): 54.6% at the first attempt and 8.0% after a fix at the test centre (PRS). About 1 in 2 failed the first attempt. For its age, it fails 10% more often than normal: MOT Risk Index 109.9 (95% CI 106.5–113.2; 100 = normal).

Isuzu Rodeo at a glance, 2024 MOT
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
MOT pass rate62.6%incl. 8.0% fixed at the test centre20244970
Passed at the first attempt54.6%all first tests20244970
MOT Risk Index (95% CI 106.5–113.2)109.9index100 = normal for its age · rank 558 (tied) of 761 (1 = fails least for its age)20244970
Biggest excess: Suspension47.2per 10037.5 same-age2019–202438852
Dangerous defects12.6per 10011.2 UK, not age-adjusted2019–202438852
Advisory items210.3per 100127.1 UK, not age-adjusted2019–202438852
strip · Isuzu Rodeo · MOT Risk Index · 109.9 vs 100 = normal · 2024
MOT Risk Index · Isuzu Rodeo. 0–240; 100 = normal for its age; median model 92.8 · rank 558 (tied) of 761 (1 = fails least for its age). It would rank between 529 and 591 anywhere within its 95% interval, other models held where they are. DVSA, 2024.
Isuzu Rodeo index position among 761 models
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Rank558of 761published models, 1 = fails least for its age20244970
Best rank within its 95% interval529rankother models held where they are20244970
Worst rank within its 95% interval591rankother models held where they are20244970

Check this car by registration

Before you submit. Enter a UK registration to compare this vehicle with similar cars. We send the registration to the DVSA MOT History API, do not put it in the URL or send it to analytics, and keep any server-side cache for no more than 15 minutes. MOT history is free on GOV.UK; we do not sell it. Statistical information, not vehicle condition advice. Read how we use your data.

Download this page's numbers (CSV) · How to cite

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · full dataset (v5). This model's index changed from 106.9 to 109.9 in the 24 September 2026 release, after duplicate test records were removed.

What actually fails on an Isuzu Rodeo MOT, and how often?

Isuzu Rodeo MOTs fail most often on ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’: 51.5 per 100 tests, against 43.8 for UK vehicles of the same age (2019–2024, n = 38,852).

bar · Isuzu Rodeo · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment · 51.5 vs 43.8 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment51.5per 10043.82019–202420014
Suspension47.2per 10037.52019–202418319
Brakes27.7per 10028.12019–202410757
Body, chassis, structure19.4per 10020.12019–20247550
Visibility16.4per 10018.72019–20246391
Steering8.8per 1007.52019–20243403

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 38,852 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Tyres, brakes and suspension: how does the Isuzu Rodeo compare with vehicles of the same age?

The biggest excess for the Isuzu Rodeo is suspension at age 8: 15.9 failures per 100 tests, against 7.8 for same-age vehicles of comparable models (2019–2024, n = 1,066).

bullet · Isuzu Rodeo · Tyres, age 8 · 4.1 vs 6.3 · 2019–2024
Tyres, age 8: 4.1 vs 6.3. Brakes, age 8: 9.5 vs 5.4. Suspension, age 8: 15.9 vs 7.8. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Tyres, age 84.1per 1006.32019–20241066
Brakes, age 89.5per 1005.42019–20241066
Suspension, age 815.9per 1007.82019–20241066

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Will my Isuzu Rodeo's advisory become a fail at the next MOT?

Isuzu Rodeo advisories turn into fails more often than on the median model: lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment advisories became a fail at the next MOT 38.9% of the time.

funnel · Isuzu Rodeo · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment · 38.9 vs median model · 2019–2024
Advisories on lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment: 38.9 of 100 became a fail on the same item at the next MOT. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment38.9% next failmedian model2019–2024922
Suspension29.1% next failmedian model2019–202411779
Body, chassis, structure21.3% next failmedian model2019–20244389
Steering19.8% next failmedian model2019–2024732
Brakes19.0% next failmedian model2019–20248866
Tyres8.2% next failmedian model2019–20245809
Noise, emissions and leaks5.5% next failmedian model2019–20242381
Identification of the vehicle4.6% next failmedian model2019–2024938
Full table
Further values · 2019–2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Non-component advisories0% next failmedian model2019–20241529

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

My Isuzu Rodeo got an MOT advisory: what gets flagged most?

Isuzu Rodeo MOTs flag suspension most: 74.9 advisories per 100 tests, against 26.2 across UK tests (2019–2024, n = 38,852).

bar · Isuzu Rodeo · Suspension · 74.9 vs 26.2 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Suspension74.9per 10026.22019–202429092
Brakes54per 10034.72019–202420988
Tyres31.7per 10039.72019–202412301
Body, chassis, structure21.9per 1004.62019–20248511
Noise, emissions and leaks9.3per 1005.22019–20243620
Non-component advisories5.8per 1007.82019–20242251

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 38,852 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What is likely to fail next on an Isuzu Rodeo?

For Isuzu Rodeos aged 12 to 14 whose last MOT was a fail, the item most likely to fail at the next MOT is ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’: 36.4% failed on it (2019–2024, n = 5,132).

bar · Isuzu Rodeo · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass · 12 vs baseline · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass12% next fail2019–2024775
Suspension, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass11.2% next fail2019–2024775
Visibility, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass7.5% next fail2019–2024775
Brakes, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass7.0% next fail2019–2024775
Body, chassis, structure, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass3.1% next fail2019–2024775
Tyres, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass2.1% next fail2019–2024775
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass1.8% next fail2019–2024775
Identification of the vehicle, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass0.8% next fail2019–2024775
Full table
Further values · 2019–2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Noise, emissions and leaks, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass0.8% next fail2019–2024775
Steering, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass0.7% next fail2019–2024775
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 6 to 8 years old, after an advisory20.5% next fail2019–2024687
Suspension, 6 to 8 years old, after an advisory18.9% next fail2019–2024687
Brakes, 6 to 8 years old, after an advisory13.3% next fail2019–2024687
Visibility, 6 to 8 years old, after an advisory13.3% next fail2019–2024687
Body, chassis, structure, 6 to 8 years old, after an advisory5.1% next fail2019–2024687
Tyres, 6 to 8 years old, after an advisory4.1% next fail2019–2024687
Noise, emissions and leaks, 6 to 8 years old, after an advisory2.6% next fail2019–2024687
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 6 to 8 years old, after an advisory1.5% next fail2019–2024687
Steering, 6 to 8 years old, after an advisory1.3% next fail2019–2024687
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail28.0% next fail2019–2024896
Suspension, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail22.3% next fail2019–2024896
Brakes, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail14.7% next fail2019–2024896
Visibility, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail13.2% next fail2019–2024896
Body, chassis, structure, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail8.7% next fail2019–2024896
Tyres, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail4.9% next fail2019–2024896
Noise, emissions and leaks, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail3.6% next fail2019–2024896
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail3.0% next fail2019–2024896
Steering, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail1.3% next fail2019–2024896
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass18.3% next fail2019–20242501
Suspension, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass14.1% next fail2019–20242501
Brakes, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass9.0% next fail2019–20242501
Visibility, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass7.1% next fail2019–20242501
Body, chassis, structure, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass5% next fail2019–20242501
Tyres, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass2% next fail2019–20242501
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass1.8% next fail2019–20242501
Noise, emissions and leaks, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass1.7% next fail2019–20242501
Steering, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass1.4% next fail2019–20242501
Identification of the vehicle, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass0.4% next fail2019–20242501
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory27.5% next fail2019–20242698
Suspension, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory22.0% next fail2019–20242698
Brakes, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory13.7% next fail2019–20242698
Visibility, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory12.9% next fail2019–20242698
Body, chassis, structure, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory7.6% next fail2019–20242698
Tyres, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory4.4% next fail2019–20242698
Noise, emissions and leaks, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory3.0% next fail2019–20242698
Steering, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory2.4% next fail2019–20242698
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory2.3% next fail2019–20242698
Identification of the vehicle, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory0.9% next fail2019–20242698
Road wheels, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory0.3% next fail2019–20242698
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail35.9% next fail2019–20243950
Suspension, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail27.3% next fail2019–20243950
Brakes, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail18.7% next fail2019–20243950
Visibility, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail15.4% next fail2019–20243950
Body, chassis, structure, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail12.4% next fail2019–20243950
Tyres, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail5.3% next fail2019–20243950
Noise, emissions and leaks, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail4.3% next fail2019–20243950
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail4% next fail2019–20243950
Steering, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail3.1% next fail2019–20243950
Identification of the vehicle, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail0.8% next fail2019–20243950
Road wheels, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail0.5% next fail2019–20243950
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass18.4% next fail2019–20242572
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass15.0% next fail2019–20242572
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass10.3% next fail2019–20242572
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass9.4% next fail2019–20242572
Body, chassis, structure, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass8.4% next fail2019–20242572
Steering, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass4.7% next fail2019–20242572
Tyres, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass2.4% next fail2019–20242572
Noise, emissions and leaks, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass2.2% next fail2019–20242572
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass1.9% next fail2019–20242572
Identification of the vehicle, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass0.4% next fail2019–20242572
Road wheels, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass0.2% next fail2019–20242572
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory27.7% next fail2019–20243514
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory24.9% next fail2019–20243514
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory14.1% next fail2019–20243514
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory13.6% next fail2019–20243514
Body, chassis, structure, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory12.6% next fail2019–20243514
Steering, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory6.7% next fail2019–20243514
Tyres, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory4.1% next fail2019–20243514
Noise, emissions and leaks, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory3.0% next fail2019–20243514
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory2.3% next fail2019–20243514
Identification of the vehicle, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory0.8% next fail2019–20243514
Road wheels, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory0.2% next fail2019–20243514
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail36.4% next fail2019–20245132
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail30.1% next fail2019–20245132
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail20.0% next fail2019–20245132
Body, chassis, structure, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail17.3% next fail2019–20245132
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail16.5% next fail2019–20245132
Steering, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail9.7% next fail2019–20245132
Tyres, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail5.3% next fail2019–20245132
Noise, emissions and leaks, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail4.9% next fail2019–20245132
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail3.4% next fail2019–20245132
Identification of the vehicle, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail1.1% next fail2019–20245132
Road wheels, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail0.2% next fail2019–20245132
Speedometer and speed limiter, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail0.1% next fail2019–20245132
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass15.3% next fail2019–20241724
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass14.9% next fail2019–20241724
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass9.4% next fail2019–20241724
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass8.2% next fail2019–20241724
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass7.3% next fail2019–20241724
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass7.0% next fail2019–20241724
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass1.7% next fail2019–20241724
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass1.4% next fail2019–20241724
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass1.0% next fail2019–20241724
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory25.6% next fail2019–20242727
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory24.8% next fail2019–20242727
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory16.0% next fail2019–20242727
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory14.0% next fail2019–20242727
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory13.7% next fail2019–20242727
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory11.3% next fail2019–20242727
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory3.4% next fail2019–20242727
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory3.3% next fail2019–20242727
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory1.9% next fail2019–20242727
Identification of the vehicle, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory0.6% next fail2019–20242727
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail31.6% next fail2019–20243611
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail29.2% next fail2019–20243611
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail21.5% next fail2019–20243611
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail18.8% next fail2019–20243611
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail17.2% next fail2019–20243611
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail13.8% next fail2019–20243611
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail5.4% next fail2019–20243611
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail4.8% next fail2019–20243611
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail2.8% next fail2019–20243611
Identification of the vehicle, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail0.8% next fail2019–20243611
Road wheels, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail0.3% next fail2019–20243611
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 59 cars)22.0% next fail2019–202459
Suspension, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 59 cars)22.0% next fail2019–202459
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 59 cars)20.3% next fail2019–202459
Brakes, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 59 cars)15.3% next fail2019–202459
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 59 cars)8.5% next fail2019–202459
Visibility, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 59 cars)8.5% next fail2019–202459

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How often does an Isuzu Rodeo get a dangerous MOT defect?

The Isuzu Rodeo gets a dangerous defect more often than the UK average: 12.6 per 100 first tests against 11.2 across the UK. A dangerous defect means the vehicle should not be driven away until it is fixed. In the same tests, 136.7 major and 35.6 minor defects were recorded per 100 tests (one test can record several).

bullet · Isuzu Rodeo · Dangerous defects · 12.6 vs 11.2 · 2019–2024
Dangerous defects: 12.6 vs 11.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Dangerous defects12.6per 10011.22019–202438852

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 38,852 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id; severity not recorded for some 2018–2021 tests · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Will my Isuzu Rodeo still pass its MOT in a few years?

First-time MOT failures for the Isuzu Rodeo go from 44.0% at age 12 (rough estimate: 223 tests, 95% interval 37.6–50.5%) to 42.6% at age 19, against 43.5% for all vehicles aged 19 (2024, n = 4,970).

line · Isuzu Rodeo · Age 12 (rough estimate: 223 tests, 95% interval 37.6–50.5%) · 44.0 vs 35.7 · 2024
Age 12 (rough esti: 44.0. Age 19: 42.6. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 12 (rough estimate: 223 tests, 95% interval 37.6–50.5%)44.0% failed first time35.72024223
Age 1342.5% failed first time38.22024685
Age 1445.7% failed first time40.42024892
Age 15 (rough estimate: 477 tests, 95% interval 45.0–53.9%)49.5% failed first time41.62024477
Age 16 (rough estimate: 470 tests, 95% interval 41.5–50.5%)46.0% failed first time43.12024470
Age 1747.3% failed first time43.12024575
Age 1846.9% failed first time43.92024595
Age 1942.6% failed first time43.52024549

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does the Isuzu Rodeo compare with vehicles of its own age and size?

At 6 of 14 ages shown, Isuzu Rodeos fail first time more often than comparable models of the same size class; the biggest difference is at age 19, where they fail less often: 42.3% against 47.0% (2024, n = 1,137).

line · Isuzu Rodeo · Age 7 · 35.7 vs 32.4 · 2024
Age 7: 35.7. Age 20: 44.9. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 735.7% fail32.42024269
Age 837.4% fail35.720241066
Age 940.3% fail38.420242215
Age 1043.3% fail40.920242856
Age 1143.5% fail43.120243573
Age 1245.6% fail44.920244445
Age 1345.7% fail46.120244964
Age 1446.5% fail46.920244931
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 1545.8% fail47.420244408
Age 1644.9% fail47.620243564
Age 1745.6% fail47.520242774
Age 1845.5% fail47.520241942
Age 1942.3% fail47.020241137
Age 2044.9% fail46.12024510

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Isuzu Rodeo years should I avoid?

The Isuzu Rodeo build year that fails most for its age is 2009: index 105.0 (95% CI 100.1–110.0) against the model's own age norm of 100 (2019–2024, n = 3,698).

Build year matters for the Isuzu Rodeo: 2009 Isuzu Rodeos fail more than their age would predict, 2004 ones less. Years whose confidence interval includes normal are shown without a label.

bar · Isuzu Rodeo · Build year 2003 (rough estimate: 451 tests, 95% interval 91.4–119.6) · 105.5 vs 100 = normal · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Build year 2003 (rough estimate: 451 tests, 95% interval 91.4–119.6)105.5index vs own age100 = normal2019–2024451
Build year 2004 (better for its age) (rough estimate: 3,149 tests, 95% interval 89.6–99.6)94.6index vs own age100 = normal2019–20243149
Build year 200597.8index vs own age100 = normal2019–20244678
Build year 200698.2index vs own age100 = normal2019–20244895
Build year 2007101.7index vs own age100 = normal2019–20244877
Build year 2008 (rough estimate: 3,931 tests, 95% interval 99.5–108.9)104.2index vs own age100 = normal2019–20243931
Build year 2009 (worse for its age) (rough estimate: 3,698 tests, 95% interval 100.1–110.0)105index vs own age100 = normal2019–20243698
Build year 201098.3index vs own age100 = normal2019–20246347
Full table
Further values · 2019–2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Build year 201196.1index vs own age100 = normal2019–20244535
Build year 2012 (rough estimate: 1,169 tests, 95% interval 92.3–110.3)101.3index vs own age100 = normal2019–20241169

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How much does it cost to fix an Isuzu Rodeo MOT fail?

Expected repair cost per Isuzu Rodeo MOT: about £199 (up to about £377 if more expensive parts are needed), from the chance of failing each item and its most common UK repair price (catalogue estimate, n = 4,970).

Computed, not measured.

bar · Isuzu Rodeo · Expected repair bill · 198.6 vs modal price catalogue · price catalogue
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (price catalogue)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Expected repair bill198.6GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue4970
Estimated range lower198.6GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue4970
Estimated range upper377.4GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue4970
Suspension: Suspension coil spring (single corner)85.0GBP expected contribution180price catalogue4970
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment: Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)72.1GBP expected contribution140price catalogue4970
Brakes: Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)41.5GBP expected contribution150price catalogue4970

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: price catalogue · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the Isuzu Rodeo more reliable than similar cars?

Of 8 similar models, 3 fail less often for their age than the Isuzu Rodeo and 5 as often or more. The Isuzu Rodeo has an MOT Risk Index of 109.9, where 100 = normal for its age (2024, n = 4,970).

bar · Isuzu Rodeo · Isuzu Rodeo (this model) · 109.9 vs 100 = normal · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Isuzu Rodeo (this model)109.9index100 = normal20244970
Citroen Relay112.6index109.9202413072
Ford Tourneo Connect115index109.9202414469
Volkswagen Crafter94.9index109.920245407
Vauxhall Movano124.7index109.920244473
Volkswagen Caravelle106.4index109.9202418657
Renault Master103index109.9202415309
Fiat Scudo123.7index109.920248100
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Citroen Nemo122.9index109.9202413917

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many miles does an Isuzu Rodeo normally do?

At age 17, the median Isuzu Rodeo had covered 131,576 miles by its MOT; the middle half ranged from 102,123 to 160,222 miles (2024, n = 575).

line · Isuzu Rodeo · Age 12 median (rough estimate) · 110137 vs baseline · 2024
Age 12 median (rou: 110137. Age 19 P75: 165493. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 12 median (rough estimate)110137miles2024223
Age 12 P25 (rough estimate)83338miles2024223
Age 12 P75 (rough estimate)134580miles2024223
Age 13 median107955miles2024685
Age 13 P2585258miles2024685
Age 13 P75138004miles2024685
Age 14 median117687miles2024892
Age 14 P2593034miles2024892
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 14 P75145451miles2024892
Age 15 median (rough estimate)117564miles2024477
Age 15 P25 (rough estimate)93956miles2024477
Age 15 P75 (rough estimate)149704miles2024477
Age 16 median (rough estimate)127802miles2024470
Age 16 P25 (rough estimate)104983miles2024470
Age 16 P75 (rough estimate)157772miles2024470
Age 17 median131576miles2024575
Age 17 P25102123miles2024575
Age 17 P75160222miles2024575
Age 18 median136504miles2024595
Age 18 P25107131miles2024595
Age 18 P75163326miles2024595
Age 19 median136766miles2024549
Age 19 P25100617miles2024549
Age 19 P75165493miles2024549

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does high mileage mean more Isuzu Rodeo MOT failures at the same age?

At ages 15+, 36.7% of Isuzu Rodeos with 40,000 to 70,000 miles failed first time, against 47.7% of those with over 140,000 miles (2024, n = 1,516). Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.

bar · Isuzu Rodeo · Age 10–14, 40-70k miles (rough estimate: 197 tests, 95% interval 26.8–39.8%) · 33 vs baseline · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 10–14, 40-70k miles (rough estimate: 197 tests, 95% interval 26.8–39.8%)33% failed first time2024197
Age 10–14, 70-100k miles (rough estimate: 418 tests, 95% interval 37.9–47.4%)42.6% failed first time2024418
Age 10–14, 100-140k miles46.7% failed first time2024655
Age 10–14, 140k+ miles (rough estimate: 481 tests, 95% interval 44–52.9%)48.4% failed first time2024481
Age 15+, 40-70k miles (rough estimate: 207 tests, 95% interval 30.4–43.5%)36.7% failed first time2024207
Age 15+, 70-100k miles43% failed first time2024539
Age 15+, 100-140k miles47.9% failed first time20241040
Age 15+, 140k+ miles47.7% failed first time20241309

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many miles does an Isuzu Rodeo last?

63.0% of Isuzu Rodeos tested had reached 100,000 miles, and 21.4% had reached 150,000 (2024, n = 24,410).

line · Isuzu Rodeo · 100,000 miles · 63.0 vs baseline · 2024
100,000 miles: 63.0. 200,000 miles: 4.7. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
100,000 miles63.0% of tested cars202424410
150,000 miles21.4% of tested cars20248293
200,000 miles4.7% of tested cars20241827

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the Isuzu Rodeo driven more or less than average, and does that change the picture?

Matched on annual mileage as well as age, the Isuzu Rodeo index is 105.1, against 110.7 on age alone (2019–2024, n = 4,970).

slope · Isuzu Rodeo · Age and mileage adjusted index · 105.1 vs 110.7 · 2019–2024
Age and mileage adjusted index: 110.7 vs 105.1. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age and mileage adjusted index105.1index110.72019–20244970

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Isuzu Rodeo fuel fails its MOT less?

All Isuzu Rodeos tested were diesel: 45.4% failed first time (2024, n = 4,963).

bar · Isuzu Rodeo · Diesel · 45.4 vs other fuels · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Diesel45.4% fail first timeother fuels20244963

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Where in Britain does the Isuzu Rodeo fail its MOT most?

Isuzu Rodeo fails first-time MOTs most in Paisley (PA): 66.2% against 44.6% across Britain for this model, both 2019–2024 (2024, n = 145).

First-time failure rates for the Isuzu Rodeo range from 36.2% in the Sheffield (S) postcode area to 56.1% in the Plymouth (PL) postcode area, before allowing for age: a wider spread by area than for the typical model.

map · Isuzu Rodeo · Paisley (PA) (rough estimate: 145 tests, 95% interval 58.2–73.4%) · 66.2 vs 45.4 · 2024
Scotland. N. England. Wales. London. S. West. % failing. 39%. 54%. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Paisley (PA) (rough estimate: 145 tests, 95% interval 58.2–73.4%)66.2% fail first time45.42024145
Perth (PH) (rough estimate: 249 tests, 95% interval 52.8–65.0%)59.0% fail first time45.42024249
Kirkcaldy (KY) (rough estimate: 183 tests, 95% interval 50.7–64.8%)57.9% fail first time45.42024183
Southend-on-Sea (SS) (rough estimate: 112 tests, 95% interval 16.4–31.8%)23.2% fail first time45.42024112
Slough (SL) (rough estimate: 112 tests, 95% interval 17.1–32.8%)24.1% fail first time45.42024112
Manchester (M) (rough estimate: 130 tests, 95% interval 19.4–34.3%)26.1% fail first time45.42024130
Torquay (TQ) (rough estimate: 476 tests, 95% interval 52.7–61.5%)57.1% fail first time45.42024476
Plymouth (PL)56.1% fail first time45.42024726
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Bournemouth (BH) (rough estimate: 356 tests, 95% interval 50.1–60.4%)55.3% fail first time45.42024356
Galashiels (TD) (rough estimate: 142 tests, 95% interval 46.7–62.9%)54.9% fail first time45.42024142
Stoke-on-Trent (ST) (rough estimate: 354 tests, 95% interval 49.3–59.6%)54.5% fail first time45.42024354
Carlisle (CA) (rough estimate: 492 tests, 95% interval 49.9–58.6%)54.3% fail first time45.42024492
Bath (BA) (rough estimate: 380 tests, 95% interval 49.2–59.2%)54.2% fail first time45.42024380
Exeter (EX)54.2% fail first time45.420241000
Lancaster (LA) (rough estimate: 279 tests, 95% interval 48.3–59.9%)54.1% fail first time45.42024279
Brighton (BN) (rough estimate: 316 tests, 95% interval 46.1–57.0%)51.6% fail first time45.42024316
Dorchester (DT) (rough estimate: 357 tests, 95% interval 46.1–56.4%)51.3% fail first time45.42024357
Inverness (IV) (rough estimate: 354 tests, 95% interval 45.9–56.3%)51.1% fail first time45.42024354
Harrogate (HG) (rough estimate: 149 tests, 95% interval 42.4–58.3%)50.3% fail first time45.42024149
Salisbury (SP) (rough estimate: 308 tests, 95% interval 44.5–55.5%)50% fail first time45.42024308
Huddersfield (HD) (rough estimate: 156 tests, 95% interval 42.2–57.8%)50% fail first time45.42024156
Nottingham (NG)49.9% fail first time45.42024824
Lincoln (LN)49.6% fail first time45.42024508
Worcester (WR) (rough estimate: 423 tests, 95% interval 44.2–53.7%)48.9% fail first time45.42024423
Bristol (BS) (rough estimate: 465 tests, 95% interval 44.1–53.1%)48.6% fail first time45.42024465
Swansea (SA)48.4% fail first time45.420241493
Wolverhampton (WV) (rough estimate: 145 tests, 95% interval 40.3–56.4%)48.3% fail first time45.42024145
Telford (TF) (rough estimate: 195 tests, 95% interval 41.3–55.2%)48.2% fail first time45.42024195
Oldham (OL) (rough estimate: 125 tests, 95% interval 39.4–56.7%)48% fail first time45.42024125
Oxford (OX)47.9% fail first time45.42024501
Southampton (SO)47.9% fail first time45.42024633
Leeds (LS) (rough estimate: 226 tests, 95% interval 41.4–54.3%)47.8% fail first time45.42024226
Hereford (HR)47.4% fail first time45.42024839
Aberdeen (AB) (rough estimate: 334 tests, 95% interval 41.7–52.4%)47.0% fail first time45.42024334
Truro (TR) (rough estimate: 380 tests, 95% interval 41.9–51.9%)46.8% fail first time45.42024380
York (YO)46.7% fail first time45.42024773
Darlington (DL) (rough estimate: 385 tests, 95% interval 41.1–51.0%)46.0% fail first time45.42024385
Newport (NP)45.9% fail first time45.42024612
Milton Keynes (MK) (rough estimate: 315 tests, 95% interval 40.3–51.2%)45.7% fail first time45.42024315
Shrewsbury (SY)45.7% fail first time45.420241199
Newcastle (NE)45.5% fail first time45.42024573
Northampton (NN) (rough estimate: 454 tests, 95% interval 40.6–49.7%)45.1% fail first time45.42024454
Stockport (SK) (rough estimate: 279 tests, 95% interval 39.1–50.7%)44.8% fail first time45.42024279
Taunton (TA) (rough estimate: 448 tests, 95% interval 40.1–49.3%)44.6% fail first time45.42024448
Ipswich (IP)44.5% fail first time45.420241006
Edinburgh (EH) (rough estimate: 280 tests, 95% interval 38.6–50.1%)44.3% fail first time45.42024280
Dundee (DD) (rough estimate: 211 tests, 95% interval 37.5–50.8%)44.1% fail first time45.42024211
Peterborough (PE)44.0% fail first time45.420241070
Glasgow (G) (rough estimate: 165 tests, 95% interval 36.3–51.3%)43.6% fail first time45.42024165
Reading (RG) (rough estimate: 370 tests, 95% interval 38.3–48.3%)43.2% fail first time45.42024370
Leicester (LE)43.2% fail first time45.42024829
Portsmouth (PO) (rough estimate: 471 tests, 95% interval 38.7–47.6%)43.1% fail first time45.42024471
Cardiff (CF)42.7% fail first time45.42024606
Guildford (GU) (rough estimate: 424 tests, 95% interval 38.1–47.4%)42.7% fail first time45.42024424
Bradford (BD) (rough estimate: 226 tests, 95% interval 36.2–49.0%)42.5% fail first time45.42024226
Llandrindod Wells (LD) (rough estimate: 345 tests, 95% interval 36.9–47.3%)42.0% fail first time45.42024345
Norwich (NR)42.0% fail first time45.42024926
Llandudno (LL)42.0% fail first time45.420241134
Gloucester (GL)41.9% fail first time45.42024893
Swindon (SN) (rough estimate: 397 tests, 95% interval 36.8–46.5%)41.6% fail first time45.42024397
Blackburn (BB) (rough estimate: 104 tests, 95% interval 32.4–51.0%)41.4% fail first time45.42024104
Birmingham (B) (rough estimate: 468 tests, 95% interval 36.9–45.8%)41.2% fail first time45.42024468
Chester (CH) (rough estimate: 194 tests, 95% interval 34.5–48.3%)41.2% fail first time45.42024194
Kilmarnock (KA) (rough estimate: 306 tests, 95% interval 35.8–46.8%)41.2% fail first time45.42024306
Kirkwall (KW) (rough estimate: 157 tests, 95% interval 33.4–48.6%)40.8% fail first time45.42024157
Coventry (CV)40.0% fail first time45.42024648
Preston (PR) (rough estimate: 196 tests, 95% interval 33.2–46.8%)39.8% fail first time45.42024196
Dumfries (DG) (rough estimate: 272 tests, 95% interval 34.1–45.6%)39.7% fail first time45.42024272
Canterbury (CT) (rough estimate: 194 tests, 95% interval 33.1–46.7%)39.7% fail first time45.42024194
Tonbridge (TN)39.0% fail first time45.42024874
Derby (DE)38.8% fail first time45.42024788
Durham (DH) (rough estimate: 228 tests, 95% interval 32.5–45.1%)38.6% fail first time45.42024228
Liverpool (L) (rough estimate: 127 tests, 95% interval 30.6–47.3%)38.6% fail first time45.42024127
Hemel Hempstead (HP) (rough estimate: 239 tests, 95% interval 32.5–44.8%)38.5% fail first time45.42024239
Dudley (DY) (rough estimate: 214 tests, 95% interval 32.1–45.0%)38.3% fail first time45.42024214
Hull (HU) (rough estimate: 241 tests, 95% interval 31.9–44.0%)37.8% fail first time45.42024241
Medway (ME) (rough estimate: 241 tests, 95% interval 31.9–44.0%)37.8% fail first time45.42024241
Stevenage (SG) (rough estimate: 204 tests, 95% interval 31.4–44.6%)37.8% fail first time45.42024204
Redhill (RH) (rough estimate: 366 tests, 95% interval 32.6–42.5%)37.4% fail first time45.42024366
Walsall (WS) (rough estimate: 162 tests, 95% interval 30.0–44.7%)37.0% fail first time45.42024162
Chelmsford (CM) (rough estimate: 290 tests, 95% interval 31.6–42.6%)36.9% fail first time45.42024290
Colchester (CO) (rough estimate: 409 tests, 95% interval 32.1–41.4%)36.7% fail first time45.42024409
Warrington (WA) (rough estimate: 131 tests, 95% interval 28.9–45.2%)36.6% fail first time45.42024131
Sheffield (S)36.2% fail first time45.42024516
Cleveland (TS) (rough estimate: 232 tests, 95% interval 30.3–42.6%)36.2% fail first time45.42024232
Doncaster (DN) (rough estimate: 477 tests, 95% interval 31.7–40.3%)35.9% fail first time45.42024477
Crewe (CW) (rough estimate: 196 tests, 95% interval 29.3–42.6%)35.7% fail first time45.42024196
Cambridge (CB) (rough estimate: 340 tests, 95% interval 30.7–40.8%)35.6% fail first time45.42024340
Halifax (HX) (rough estimate: 112 tests, 95% interval 26.6–44.0%)34.8% fail first time45.42024112
Luton (LU) (rough estimate: 114 tests, 95% interval 24.6–41.5%)32.5% fail first time45.42024114
Wakefield (WF) (rough estimate: 215 tests, 95% interval 24.9–37.2%)30.7% fail first time45.42024215

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does an Isuzu Rodeo rust more than average?

Allowing for age, Isuzu Rodeo MOTs record corrosion failures at 7.3 times the national rate: 5.58% of tests against 0.77% (2024 + geographic layers, n = 4,951).

Computed, not measured.

slope · Isuzu Rodeo · Salt belt susceptibility · 7.3 vs 1 · 2024 + geographic layers
Salt belt susceptibility: 1 vs 7.3. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2024 + geographic layers)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Salt belt susceptibility7.3ratio estimate12024 + geographic layers4951

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 + geographic layers · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is an Isuzu Rodeo ULEZ compliant?

An estimated 0.2% of Isuzu Rodeos tested are likely ULEZ-compliant, judged from fuel type and first-use date; check a specific van with TfL's vehicle checker (2024).

Computed, not measured.

stacked · Isuzu Rodeo · Likely compliant · 0.2 vs baseline · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Likely compliant0.2% estimate20244970

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What do six years of MOTs show about owning an Isuzu Rodeo?

Of failed Isuzu Rodeo MOTs, 21.9% were retested the same day and a further 70.3% within 10 days; the median failed van passed its retest after 2 days (2019–2024, n = 12,231).

bar · Isuzu Rodeo · Same-day retest · 21.9 vs failed initial tests · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Same-day retest21.9%failed initial tests2019–202412231
Retest within 10 days70.3%failed initial tests2019–202412231
Clean MOT streak20.5%observed chains2019–20246905
Repeat advisory54.2%observed chains2019–20246905
Decreasing odometer1.4% mileage anomalyobserved chains2019–20247493

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is low mileage better for an Isuzu Rodeo?

Isuzu Rodeos aged 8 to 14 doing under 5,000 miles a year failed first time in 29.0% of tests, against 46.8% for those doing 8,000 to 12,000 miles (2019–2024, n = 2,080).

bullet · Isuzu Rodeo · Low-use first-time failure · 29.0 vs 46.8 · 2019–2024
Low-use first-time failure: 29 vs 46.8. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Low-use first-time failure29.0%46.82019–20242080
Low-use gap-17.8percentage points8–12k miles2019–20242080

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

If an Isuzu Rodeo fails, does it fail again?

40.2% of Isuzu Rodeos that failed an MOT failed the next one too, against 36.9% after a pass (2019–2024, n = 3,805). The failure most likely to come back is visibility: 34.0% of those fails recurred at the next MOT.

bullet · Isuzu Rodeo · Repeat after fail · 40.2 vs 36.9 · 2019–2024
Repeat after fail: 40.2 vs 36.9. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Repeat after fail40.2%36.92019–20243805

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Isuzu Rodeo faults come together?

On Isuzu Rodeos, identification of the vehicle and seat belts and supplementary restraint systems failures turn up together 4.3 times as often as chance would predict (2024, n = 32).

Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Identification of the vehicle + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 32 tests, 95% interval 3.0–6.1)4.3liftexpected joint rate202432
Identification of the vehicle + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 42 tests, 95% interval 3.0–5.7)4.2liftexpected joint rate202442
Identification of the vehicle + Tyres (rough estimate: 44 tests, 95% interval 2.8–5.1)3.8liftexpected joint rate202444
Body, chassis, structure + Noise, emissions and leaks3.6liftexpected joint rate2024611
Body, chassis, structure + Identification of the vehicle (rough estimate: 105 tests, 95% interval 2.5–3.7)3.0liftexpected joint rate2024105
Brakes + Road Wheels (rough estimate: 42 tests, 95% interval 2.1–4.0)3.0liftexpected joint rate202442
Brakes + Noise, emissions and leaks2.9liftexpected joint rate2024615
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Road Wheels (rough estimate: 73 tests, 95% interval 2.3–3.7)2.9liftexpected joint rate202473
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Noise, emissions and leaks + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 104 tests, 95% interval 2.4–3.5)2.9liftexpected joint rate2024104
Brakes + Identification of the vehicle (rough estimate: 121 tests, 95% interval 2.3–3.4)2.8liftexpected joint rate2024121
Road Wheels + Visibility (rough estimate: 33 tests, 95% interval 1.9–3.9)2.8liftexpected joint rate202433
Identification of the vehicle + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (rough estimate: 210 tests, 95% interval 2.4–3.1)2.7liftexpected joint rate2024210
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Tyres (rough estimate: 113 tests, 95% interval 2.2–3.3)2.7liftexpected joint rate2024113
Body, chassis, structure + Steering2.7liftexpected joint rate2024812
Body, chassis, structure + Brakes2.6liftexpected joint rate20241908
Brakes + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 406 tests, 95% interval 2.4–2.9)2.6liftexpected joint rate2024406
Brakes + Tyres2.6liftexpected joint rate2024633
Noise, emissions and leaks + Tyres (rough estimate: 147 tests, 95% interval 2.2–3.0)2.6liftexpected joint rate2024147
Identification of the vehicle + Steering (rough estimate: 46 tests, 95% interval 1.9–3.4)2.6liftexpected joint rate202446
Identification of the vehicle + Suspension (rough estimate: 170 tests, 95% interval 2.2–3.0)2.6liftexpected joint rate2024170
Steering + Tyres (rough estimate: 253 tests, 95% interval 2.2–2.8)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024253
Identification of the vehicle + Visibility (rough estimate: 92 tests, 95% interval 2.0–3.1)2.5liftexpected joint rate202492
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems2.5liftexpected joint rate2024691
Body, chassis, structure + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 308 tests, 95% interval 2.2–2.8)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024308
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Visibility (rough estimate: 325 tests, 95% interval 2.2–2.7)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024325
Noise, emissions and leaks + Steering (rough estimate: 215 tests, 95% interval 2.1–2.8)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024215
Steering + Suspension2.5liftexpected joint rate20241418
Brakes + Steering2.4liftexpected joint rate2024887
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Suspension2.4liftexpected joint rate2024565
Body, chassis, structure + Tyres (rough estimate: 461 tests, 95% interval 2.1–2.6)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024461
Road Wheels + Suspension (rough estimate: 51 tests, 95% interval 1.8–3.1)2.4liftexpected joint rate202451
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Noise, emissions and leaks2.4liftexpected joint rate2024886
Brakes + Suspension2.3liftexpected joint rate20243250
Body, chassis, structure + Suspension2.3liftexpected joint rate20242610
Noise, emissions and leaks + Suspension2.3liftexpected joint rate2024754
Suspension + Tyres2.3liftexpected joint rate2024846
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Tyres2.2liftexpected joint rate2024974
Noise, emissions and leaks + Visibility (rough estimate: 402 tests, 95% interval 2.0–2.5)2.2liftexpected joint rate2024402
Brakes + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment2.2liftexpected joint rate20243610
Tyres + Visibility (rough estimate: 443 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.3)2.1liftexpected joint rate2024443
Body, chassis, structure + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment2.1liftexpected joint rate20242718
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Suspension2.0liftexpected joint rate20245042
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Visibility2liftexpected joint rate20242758
Brakes + Visibility2liftexpected joint rate20241547
Steering + Visibility2.0liftexpected joint rate2024630
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Steering2.0liftexpected joint rate20241311
Body, chassis, structure + Visibility1.9liftexpected joint rate20241202
Body, chassis, structure + Road Wheels (rough estimate: 21 tests, 95% interval 1.2–2.9)1.9liftexpected joint rate202421
Suspension + Visibility1.8liftexpected joint rate20242163
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Steering (rough estimate: 113 tests, 95% interval 1.4–2.1)1.8liftexpected joint rate2024113
Noise, emissions and leaks + Road Wheels (seen together; too few for a multiplier)14tests with both202414
Road Wheels + Tyres (seen together; too few for a multiplier)13tests with both202413
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Speedometer and speed limiter (seen together; too few for a multiplier)11tests with both202411
Road Wheels + Steering (seen together; too few for a multiplier)11tests with both202411
Speedometer and speed limiter + Suspension (seen together; too few for a multiplier)9tests with both20249
Brakes + Speedometer and speed limiter (seen together; too few for a multiplier)8tests with both20248
Road Wheels + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (seen together; too few for a multiplier)8tests with both20248
Speedometer and speed limiter + Visibility (seen together; too few for a multiplier)7tests with both20247
Body, chassis, structure + Buses and coaches supplementary tests (seen together; too few for a multiplier)5tests with both20245
Buses and coaches supplementary tests + Suspension (seen together; too few for a multiplier)5tests with both20245

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What does an Isuzu Rodeo cost to run in a fleet?

Of every 100 Isuzu Rodeos tested at age 12, about 44 failed the MOT first time (rough estimate); at age 19, about 43 (rough estimate). These are one-year rates for different cars tested in the same year, not a fleet followed over time (2024).

Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 12 (rough estimate: 223 tests, 95% interval 37.6–50.5%)44.0% fail first time2024223
Age 13 (rough estimate: 685 tests, 95% interval 38.8–46.2%)42.5% fail first time2024685
Age 14 (rough estimate: 892 tests, 95% interval 42.5–49.0%)45.7% fail first time2024892
Age 15 (rough estimate: 477 tests, 95% interval 45.0–54.0%)49.5% fail first time2024477
Age 16 (rough estimate: 470 tests, 95% interval 41.5–50.5%)46.0% fail first time2024470
Age 17 (rough estimate: 575 tests, 95% interval 43.3–51.4%)47.3% fail first time2024575
Age 18 (rough estimate: 595 tests, 95% interval 42.9–50.9%)46.9% fail first time2024595
Age 19 (rough estimate: 549 tests, 95% interval 38.5–46.8%)42.6% fail first time2024549

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does the month of an Isuzu Rodeo MOT matter?

Isuzu Rodeos fail first time most in January (46.0%, against 31.1% for all vehicles that month) and least in August (42.5%) (2024, n = 4,970).

line · Isuzu Rodeo · January · 46.0 vs 31.1 · 2024
January: 46.0. December: 43.4. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Isuzu Rodeo: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
January46.0% fail first time31.120243760
February44.6% fail first time30.020243500
March43.7% fail first time28.320243744
April44.5% fail first time29.820242360
May45.7% fail first time28.820242573
June44.0% fail first time28.120242597
July45.0% fail first time29.320242899
August42.5% fail first time29.220242871
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
September45.2% fail first time28.220243416
October45.5% fail first time30.320244168
November44.8% fail first time30.620244066
December43.4% fail first time29.320242898

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Not enough tests for… (and why)

What have dealers been told about the Isuzu Rodeo? (US market)

layer not yet computed for this model (covers 211 of 761 models). 4,970 initial Isuzu Rodeo tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: NHTSA, US market; covers 211 of 761 models · Window: NHTSA · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

See the Volkswagen Caravelle, a van of the same inspection class with 3.8× the tests · Check your car by registration

Does the Isuzu Rodeo fail inspections in other countries too?

no match in the other-country inspection register. 4,970 initial Isuzu Rodeo tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: Statens vegvesen PKK (CC BY 4.0), Traficom Katsastus (CC BY 4.0), RDW APK (CC0), adapted; covers 430 of 761 models · Window: 2024 by country · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

See the Volkswagen Caravelle, a van of the same inspection class with 3.8× the tests · Check your car by registration

Real-world MPG against the official figure (manufacturer level)

layer not yet computed for this model (covers 19 of 761 models). 4,970 initial Isuzu Rodeo tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: European Commission OBFCM; covers 19 of 761 models · Window: 2021+ cohorts · n = 4,970 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

See the Volkswagen Caravelle, a van of the same inspection class with 3.8× the tests · Check your car by registration

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Isuzu Rodeo MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 24 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/isuzu-rodeo/

How the MOT Risk Index and every figure on this page are calculated: methodology.

Report an error

What is wrong on this page? One tap sends the category only, no text and nothing about you.

Isuzu Rodeo MOT: quick answers

What is the Isuzu Rodeo first-time MOT pass rate?

54.6% of first attempts passed in 2024 (4,970 tests). Retests after repair are excluded; cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) are shown separately.

Why does this number differ from other sites?

Other sites may count retests or all attempts. This page uses 4,970 primary tests: 45.43% failed first time and 62.6% passed when cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) count as passes. The age-adjusted MOT Risk Index 109.9 is shown separately.