MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Hyundai Amica MOT pass rate and common problems

66.3% of Hyundai Amicas passed the 2024 MOT (5,785 first tests): 56.5% at the first attempt and 9.8% after a fix at the test centre (PRS). About 2 in 5 failed the first attempt. For its age, it is statistically indistinguishable from normal: MOT Risk Index 101.2 (95% CI 98.2–104.2; 100 = normal).

Hyundai Amica at a glance, 2024 MOT
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
MOT pass rate66.3%incl. 9.8% fixed at the test centre20245785
Passed at the first attempt56.5%all first tests20245785
MOT Risk Index (95% CI 98.2–104.2)101.2index100 = normal for its age · rank 469 (tied) of 761 (1 = fails least for its age)20245785
Biggest excess: Tyres13.6per 10010.5 same-age2019–202449705
Dangerous defects16.4per 10011.2 UK, not age-adjusted2019–202449705
Advisory items161.2per 100127.1 UK, not age-adjusted2019–202449705
strip · Hyundai Amica · MOT Risk Index · 101.2 vs 100 = normal · 2024
MOT Risk Index · Hyundai Amica. 0–240; 100 = normal for its age; median model 92.8 · rank 469 (tied) of 761 (1 = fails least for its age). It would rank between 433 and 497 anywhere within its 95% interval, other models held where they are. DVSA, 2024.
Hyundai Amica index position among 761 models
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Rank469of 761published models, 1 = fails least for its age20245785
Best rank within its 95% interval433rankother models held where they are20245785
Worst rank within its 95% interval497rankother models held where they are20245785

Check this car by registration

Before you submit. Enter a UK registration to compare this vehicle with similar cars. We send the registration to the DVSA MOT History API, do not put it in the URL or send it to analytics, and keep any server-side cache for no more than 15 minutes. MOT history is free on GOV.UK; we do not sell it. Statistical information, not vehicle condition advice. Read how we use your data.

Download this page's numbers (CSV) · How to cite

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · full dataset (v5). This model's index changed from 109.4 to 101.2 in the 24 September 2026 release, after duplicate test records were removed.

What actually fails on a Hyundai Amica MOT, and how often?

Hyundai Amica MOTs fail most often on ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’: 29.8 per 100 tests, against 35.5 for UK cars of the same age (2019–2024, n = 49,705).

bar · Hyundai Amica · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment · 29.8 vs 35.5 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment29.8per 10035.52019–202414795
Brakes21.1per 10021.72019–202410463
Suspension16.7per 10030.02019–20248293
Body, chassis, structure15per 10012.72019–20247478
Tyres13.6per 10010.52019–20246757
Visibility11.2per 10011.82019–20245584

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 49,705 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Will my Hyundai Amica's advisory become a fail at the next MOT?

Hyundai Amica advisories turn into fails more often than on the median model: lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment advisories became a fail at the next MOT 30.5% of the time.

funnel · Hyundai Amica · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment · 30.5 vs median model · 2019–2024
Advisories on lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment: 30.5 of 100 became a fail on the same item at the next MOT. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment30.5% next failmedian model2019–20241061
Suspension22.3% next failmedian model2019–20245382
Body, chassis, structure18.7% next failmedian model2019–20243353
Brakes17.1% next failmedian model2019–20249889
Tyres12.6% next failmedian model2019–202410301
Noise, emissions and leaks10.9% next failmedian model2019–20242324
Identification of the vehicle3.9% next failmedian model2019–20242036
Non-component advisories0% next failmedian model2019–20241765

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

My Hyundai Amica got an MOT advisory: what gets flagged most?

Hyundai Amica MOTs flag brakes most: 49.5 advisories per 100 tests, against 34.7 across UK tests (2019–2024, n = 49,705).

bar · Hyundai Amica · Brakes · 49.5 vs 34.7 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Brakes49.5per 10034.72019–202424599
Tyres43.8per 10039.72019–202421769
Suspension30per 10026.22019–202414918
Body, chassis, structure11.2per 1004.62019–20245566
Noise, emissions and leaks7.5per 1005.22019–20243710
Identification of the vehicle6.7per 1002.52019–20243323

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 49,705 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What is likely to fail next on a Hyundai Amica?

For Hyundai Amicas aged 12 to 14 whose last MOT was a fail, the item most likely to fail at the next MOT is ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’: 18.9% failed on it (2019–2024, n = 6,337).

bar · Hyundai Amica · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass · 8.4 vs baseline · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass8.4% next fail2019–20241411
Tyres, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass7.3% next fail2019–20241411
Visibility, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass5.9% next fail2019–20241411
Brakes, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass4.9% next fail2019–20241411
Body, chassis, structure, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass3.7% next fail2019–20241411
Suspension, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass3.7% next fail2019–20241411
Noise, emissions and leaks, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass2.8% next fail2019–20241411
Steering, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass1.4% next fail2019–20241411
Full table
Further values · 2019–2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass0.4% next fail2019–20241411
Brakes, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory9.6% next fail2019–2024887
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory9.6% next fail2019–2024887
Tyres, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory9.1% next fail2019–2024887
Visibility, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory7.7% next fail2019–2024887
Suspension, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory6.8% next fail2019–2024887
Body, chassis, structure, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory5.6% next fail2019–2024887
Noise, emissions and leaks, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory4.6% next fail2019–2024887
Steering, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory1.9% next fail2019–2024887
Identification of the vehicle, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory0.8% next fail2019–2024887
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail17.9% next fail2019–20241311
Brakes, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail13.3% next fail2019–20241311
Tyres, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail11.8% next fail2019–20241311
Suspension, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail11.3% next fail2019–20241311
Visibility, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail10.0% next fail2019–20241311
Noise, emissions and leaks, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail9.6% next fail2019–20241311
Body, chassis, structure, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail7.6% next fail2019–20241311
Steering, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail2.6% next fail2019–20241311
Identification of the vehicle, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail0.6% next fail2019–20241311
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail0.6% next fail2019–20241311
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass9.1% next fail2019–20246028
Tyres, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass6.4% next fail2019–20246028
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass6.3% next fail2019–20246028
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass6.3% next fail2019–20246028
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass6.0% next fail2019–20246028
Body, chassis, structure, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass4.2% next fail2019–20246028
Noise, emissions and leaks, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass3.8% next fail2019–20246028
Steering, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass1.2% next fail2019–20246028
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass0.9% next fail2019–20246028
Identification of the vehicle, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass0.4% next fail2019–20246028
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory14.7% next fail2019–20245126
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory10.0% next fail2019–20245126
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory9.9% next fail2019–20245126
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory8.8% next fail2019–20245126
Tyres, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory8.7% next fail2019–20245126
Body, chassis, structure, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory7.3% next fail2019–20245126
Noise, emissions and leaks, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory5.8% next fail2019–20245126
Steering, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory2.2% next fail2019–20245126
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory0.9% next fail2019–20245126
Identification of the vehicle, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory0.7% next fail2019–20245126
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail18.9% next fail2019–20246337
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail13.3% next fail2019–20246337
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail13.0% next fail2019–20246337
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail11.0% next fail2019–20246337
Tyres, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail10.9% next fail2019–20246337
Noise, emissions and leaks, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail10.4% next fail2019–20246337
Body, chassis, structure, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail9.7% next fail2019–20246337
Steering, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail2.8% next fail2019–20246337
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail1.5% next fail2019–20246337
Identification of the vehicle, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail0.6% next fail2019–20246337
Road wheels, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail0.1% next fail2019–20246337
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass13.3% next fail2019–20243923
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass9.5% next fail2019–20243923
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass9.2% next fail2019–20243923
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass8.1% next fail2019–20243923
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass7.6% next fail2019–20243923
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass7.2% next fail2019–20243923
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass4.5% next fail2019–20243923
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass1.7% next fail2019–20243923
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass0.9% next fail2019–20243923
Identification of the vehicle, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass0.2% next fail2019–20243923
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory19.7% next fail2019–20244351
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory14.7% next fail2019–20244351
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory14.7% next fail2019–20244351
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory12.6% next fail2019–20244351
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory9.6% next fail2019–20244351
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory9.2% next fail2019–20244351
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory6.4% next fail2019–20244351
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory2.2% next fail2019–20244351
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory1.1% next fail2019–20244351
Identification of the vehicle, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory0.7% next fail2019–20244351
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail27.8% next fail2019–20246090
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail18.5% next fail2019–20246090
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail16.9% next fail2019–20246090
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail16.4% next fail2019–20246090
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail11.9% next fail2019–20246090
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail11.2% next fail2019–20246090
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail10.6% next fail2019–20246090
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail3.4% next fail2019–20246090
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail1.6% next fail2019–20246090
Identification of the vehicle, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail0.8% next fail2019–20246090
Road wheels, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail0.2% next fail2019–20246090
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after a pass22.2% next fail2019–2024585
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after a pass18.5% next fail2019–2024585
Suspension, 20 years or older, after a pass10.9% next fail2019–2024585
Brakes, 20 years or older, after a pass9.7% next fail2019–2024585
Visibility, 20 years or older, after a pass7.5% next fail2019–2024585
Tyres, 20 years or older, after a pass6.3% next fail2019–2024585
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after a pass3.3% next fail2019–2024585
Steering, 20 years or older, after a pass2.1% next fail2019–2024585
Identification of the vehicle, 20 years or older, after a pass1.0% next fail2019–2024585
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after a pass1.0% next fail2019–2024585
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after an advisory25.9% next fail2019–2024951
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after an advisory25.4% next fail2019–2024951
Suspension, 20 years or older, after an advisory21.1% next fail2019–2024951
Brakes, 20 years or older, after an advisory16.3% next fail2019–2024951
Tyres, 20 years or older, after an advisory11.0% next fail2019–2024951
Visibility, 20 years or older, after an advisory10.1% next fail2019–2024951
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after an advisory6.4% next fail2019–2024951
Steering, 20 years or older, after an advisory3.8% next fail2019–2024951
Identification of the vehicle, 20 years or older, after an advisory1.6% next fail2019–2024951
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after an advisory1.1% next fail2019–2024951
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after a fail32.3% next fail2019–20241360
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after a fail26.6% next fail2019–20241360
Suspension, 20 years or older, after a fail23.5% next fail2019–20241360
Brakes, 20 years or older, after a fail19.9% next fail2019–20241360
Tyres, 20 years or older, after a fail11.9% next fail2019–20241360
Visibility, 20 years or older, after a fail11.9% next fail2019–20241360
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after a fail7.9% next fail2019–20241360
Steering, 20 years or older, after a fail4.0% next fail2019–20241360
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after a fail1.5% next fail2019–20241360
Identification of the vehicle, 20 years or older, after a fail0.9% next fail2019–20241360

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How often does a Hyundai Amica get a dangerous MOT defect?

The Hyundai Amica gets a dangerous defect more often than the UK average: 16.4 per 100 first tests against 11.2 across the UK. A dangerous defect means the vehicle should not be driven away until it is fixed. In the same tests, 83.1 major and 21.8 minor defects were recorded per 100 tests (one test can record several).

bullet · Hyundai Amica · Dangerous defects · 16.4 vs 11.2 · 2019–2024
Dangerous defects: 16.4 vs 11.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Dangerous defects16.4per 10011.22019–202449705

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 49,705 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id; severity not recorded for some 2018–2021 tests · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Will my Hyundai Amica still pass its MOT in a few years?

First-time MOT failures for the Hyundai Amica go from 40.3% at age 16 to 44.1% at age 18, against 43.9% for all cars aged 18 (2024, n = 5,785).

line · Hyundai Amica · Age 16 · 40.3 vs 43.1 · 2024
Age 16: 40.3. Age 18: 44.1. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 1640.3% failed first time43.12024877
Age 1741.1% failed first time43.120242085
Age 1844.1% failed first time43.920241793

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does the Hyundai Amica compare with cars of its own age and size?

At 2 of 10 ages shown, Hyundai Amicas fail first time more often than comparable models of the same size class; the biggest difference is at age 15, where they fail less often: 38.7% against 48.0% (2024, n = 6,142).

line · Hyundai Amica · Age 11 · 39.3 vs 36.9 · 2024
Age 11: 39.3. Age 20: 49.0. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 1139.3% fail36.920241401
Age 1237.0% fail40.520244667
Age 1337.7% fail43.320247411
Age 1438.3% fail45.920246686
Age 1538.7% fail48.020246142
Age 1641.3% fail50.120245654
Age 1743.1% fail50.620245365
Age 1847.2% fail50.920243916
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 1952.1% fail50.320242659
Age 2049.0% fail49.620242004

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Hyundai Amica years should I avoid?

Hyundai Amica build years range from index 96.5 to 103.8 against the model's own age norm of 100 (2019–2024, n = 5,785).

bar · Hyundai Amica · Build year 2000 (rough estimate: 2,807 tests, 95% interval 98.6–109.0) · 103.8 vs 100 = normal · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Build year 2000 (rough estimate: 2,807 tests, 95% interval 98.6–109.0)103.8index vs own age100 = normal2019–20242807
Build year 2001 (rough estimate: 3,583 tests, 95% interval 93.9–103.0)98.5index vs own age100 = normal2019–20243583
Build year 2002 (rough estimate: 4,279 tests, 95% interval 92.2–100.7)96.5index vs own age100 = normal2019–20244279
Build year 200699.5index vs own age100 = normal2019–202414739
Build year 2007 (better for its age)97.4index vs own age100 = normal2019–202416330
Build year 2008100.5index vs own age100 = normal2019–20246778

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How much does it cost to fix a Hyundai Amica MOT fail?

Expected repair cost per Hyundai Amica MOT: about £116 (up to about £220 if more expensive parts are needed), from the chance of failing each item and its most common UK repair price (catalogue estimate, n = 5,785).

Computed, not measured.

bar · Hyundai Amica · Expected repair bill · 115.7 vs modal price catalogue · price catalogue
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (price catalogue)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Expected repair bill115.7GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue5785
Estimated range lower115.7GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue5785
Estimated range upper219.8GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue5785
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment: Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)41.7GBP expected contribution140price catalogue5785
Brakes: Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)31.6GBP expected contribution150price catalogue5785
Suspension: Suspension coil spring (single corner)30.1GBP expected contribution180price catalogue5785
Tyres: Tyre (single mid-range 16" fitted)12.2GBP expected contribution90price catalogue5785

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: price catalogue · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the Hyundai Amica more reliable than similar cars?

Of 8 similar models, 4 fail less often for their age than the Hyundai Amica and 4 as often or more. The Hyundai Amica has an MOT Risk Index of 101.2, where 100 = normal for its age (2024, n = 5,785).

bar · Hyundai Amica · Hyundai Amica (this model) · 101.2 vs 100 = normal · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Hyundai Amica (this model)101.2index100 = normal20245785
Smart City-Coupe98.6index101.220244878
Skoda Scala90.9index101.220247954
Skoda Rapid102.8index101.2202422303
Peugeot 106115index101.220245029
Nissan Pixo92.3index101.2202411513
Hyundai Kona93.2index101.2202445683
Chevrolet Matiz117.5index101.2202410142
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Seat Arona102.2index101.2202450672

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many miles does a Hyundai Amica normally do?

At age 17, the median Hyundai Amica had covered 56,240 miles by its MOT; the middle half ranged from 40,024 to 76,670 miles (2024, n = 2,085).

line · Hyundai Amica · Age 16 median · 60491 vs baseline · 2024
Age 16 median: 60491. Age 18 P75: 77439. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 16 median60491miles2024877
Age 16 P2543475miles2024877
Age 16 P7578973miles2024877
Age 17 median56240miles20242085
Age 17 P2540024miles20242085
Age 17 P7576670miles20242085
Age 18 median59562miles20241793
Age 18 P2541946miles20241793
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 18 P7577439miles20241793

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does high mileage mean more Hyundai Amica MOT failures at the same age?

At ages 15+, 31.4% of Hyundai Amicas with under 40,000 miles failed first time, against 54.0% of those with 100,000 to 140,000 miles (2024, n = 1,721). Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.

bar · Hyundai Amica · Age 15+, <40k miles · 31.4 vs baseline · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 15+, <40k miles31.4% failed first time20241304
Age 15+, 40-70k miles42.9% failed first time20242546
Age 15+, 70-100k miles51.9% failed first time20241458
Age 15+, 100-140k miles (rough estimate: 417 tests, 95% interval 49.2–58.7%)54% failed first time2024417

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many miles does a Hyundai Amica last?

6.2% of Hyundai Amicas tested had reached 100,000 miles, and 0.3% had reached 150,000 (2024, n = 3,101).

line · Hyundai Amica · 100,000 miles · 6.2 vs baseline · 2024
100,000 miles: 6.2. 200,000 miles (rou: 0.0. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
100,000 miles6.2% of tested cars20243101
150,000 miles (rough estimate: 143 tests, 95% interval 0.2–0.3%)0.3% of tested cars2024143
200,000 miles (rough estimate: 11 tests, 95% interval 0.0–0.0%)0.0% of tested cars202411

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the Hyundai Amica driven more or less than average, and does that change the picture?

This fleet is driven less than average. Matched on annual mileage as well as age (test chains 2019–2024), the index is 115.5, on the other side of normal, so both readings are shown.

Both readings are shown: this comparison changes when usage or inspection rules differ.

slope · Hyundai Amica · Age and mileage adjusted index · 115.5 vs 97.2 · 2019–2024
Age and mileage adjusted index: 97.2 vs 115.5. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age and mileage adjusted index115.5index97.22019–20245785

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Hyundai Amica fuel fails its MOT less?

All Hyundai Amicas tested were petrol: 43.5% failed first time (2024, n = 5,782).

bar · Hyundai Amica · Petrol · 43.5 vs other fuels · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Petrol43.5% fail first timeother fuels20245782

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Hyundai Amica engine is best?

No Hyundai Amica engine band clearly fails less or more for its age: the capacity bands are within 5 index points of each other or their 95% intervals overlap (2024, n = 5,785).

bar · Hyundai Amica · Petrol 1.0–1.2 litre · 99.1 vs 100 = model average · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Petrol 1.0–1.2 litre99.1index vs model norm100 = model average202437694
Petrol under 1.0 litre102.1index vs model norm100 = model average202411941

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Where in Britain does the Hyundai Amica fail its MOT most?

Hyundai Amica fails first-time MOTs most in Kirkcaldy (KY): 63.0% against 41.7% across Britain for this model, both 2019–2024 (2024, n = 108).

First-time failure rates for the Hyundai Amica range from 31.3% in the Southend-on-Sea (SS) postcode area to 49.9% in the Exeter (EX) postcode area, before allowing for age: a wider spread by area than for the typical model.

map · Hyundai Amica · Kirkcaldy (KY) (rough estimate: 108 tests, 95% interval 53.6–71.5%) · 63.0 vs 43.5 · 2024
Scotland. N. England. Wales. London. S. West. % failing. 33%. 49%. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Kirkcaldy (KY) (rough estimate: 108 tests, 95% interval 53.6–71.5%)63.0% fail first time43.52024108
Falkirk (FK) (rough estimate: 142 tests, 95% interval 47.4–63.5%)55.6% fail first time43.52024142
York (YO) (rough estimate: 253 tests, 95% interval 48.4–60.6%)54.5% fail first time43.52024253
Enfield (EN) (rough estimate: 297 tests, 95% interval 24.1–34.4%)29.0% fail first time43.52024297
St Albans (AL) (rough estimate: 203 tests, 95% interval 24.2–36.7%)30.1% fail first time43.52024203
Slough (SL) (rough estimate: 266 tests, 95% interval 24.9–35.8%)30.1% fail first time43.52024266
Dorchester (DT) (rough estimate: 206 tests, 95% interval 46.1–59.6%)52.9% fail first time43.52024206
Lincoln (LN) (rough estimate: 261 tests, 95% interval 46.1–58.1%)52.1% fail first time43.52024261
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Hull (HU) (rough estimate: 221 tests, 95% interval 44.6–57.6%)51.1% fail first time43.52024221
Edinburgh (EH) (rough estimate: 273 tests, 95% interval 45.0–56.8%)50.9% fail first time43.52024273
Plymouth (PL) (rough estimate: 387 tests, 95% interval 45.4–55.3%)50.4% fail first time43.52024387
Newport (NP) (rough estimate: 383 tests, 95% interval 45.4–55.4%)50.4% fail first time43.52024383
Exeter (EX)49.9% fail first time43.52024720
Kilmarnock (KA) (rough estimate: 113 tests, 95% interval 40.5–58.6%)49.6% fail first time43.52024113
Glasgow (G) (rough estimate: 359 tests, 95% interval 44.2–54.5%)49.3% fail first time43.52024359
Newcastle (NE)48.9% fail first time43.52024563
Cardiff (CF)48.5% fail first time43.52024598
Ipswich (IP) (rough estimate: 474 tests, 95% interval 43.6–52.6%)48.1% fail first time43.52024474
Truro (TR) (rough estimate: 316 tests, 95% interval 42.6–53.6%)48.1% fail first time43.52024316
Torquay (TQ) (rough estimate: 339 tests, 95% interval 42.8–53.4%)48.1% fail first time43.52024339
Salisbury (SP) (rough estimate: 163 tests, 95% interval 40.3–55.5%)47.9% fail first time43.52024163
Preston (PR) (rough estimate: 418 tests, 95% interval 42.9–52.4%)47.6% fail first time43.52024418
Swansea (SA)47.6% fail first time43.52024580
Durham (DH) (rough estimate: 194 tests, 95% interval 40.5–54.4%)47.4% fail first time43.52024194
Bath (BA) (rough estimate: 418 tests, 95% interval 42.6–52.2%)47.4% fail first time43.52024418
Nottingham (NG)47.3% fail first time43.52024704
Carlisle (CA) (rough estimate: 422 tests, 95% interval 42.4–51.9%)47.2% fail first time43.52024422
Crewe (CW) (rough estimate: 282 tests, 95% interval 41.4–53.0%)47.2% fail first time43.52024282
Blackpool (FY)47.1% fail first time43.52024516
Northampton (NN)46.7% fail first time43.52024610
Telford (TF) (rough estimate: 168 tests, 95% interval 39.1–54.0%)46.4% fail first time43.52024168
Bristol (BS)46.3% fail first time43.520241142
Cleveland (TS)46.3% fail first time43.52024503
Cambridge (CB) (rough estimate: 264 tests, 95% interval 40.3–52.2%)46.2% fail first time43.52024264
Sunderland (SR) (rough estimate: 163 tests, 95% interval 38.5–53.7%)46.0% fail first time43.52024163
Oldham (OL) (rough estimate: 243 tests, 95% interval 39.5–52.0%)45.7% fail first time43.52024243
Portsmouth (PO)45.6% fail first time43.520241668
Lancaster (LA) (rough estimate: 371 tests, 95% interval 40.3–50.4%)45.3% fail first time43.52024371
Bournemouth (BH)45.2% fail first time43.520241095
Swindon (SN) (rough estimate: 341 tests, 95% interval 40.0–50.5%)45.2% fail first time43.52024341
Leeds (LS) (rough estimate: 311 tests, 95% interval 39.3–50.2%)44.7% fail first time43.52024311
Luton (LU) (rough estimate: 224 tests, 95% interval 38.3–51.2%)44.6% fail first time43.52024224
Darlington (DL) (rough estimate: 254 tests, 95% interval 38.5–50.6%)44.5% fail first time43.52024254
Gloucester (GL)44.5% fail first time43.52024614
Worcester (WR) (rough estimate: 299 tests, 95% interval 38.6–49.8%)44.1% fail first time43.52024299
Stockport (SK) (rough estimate: 446 tests, 95% interval 39.4–48.6%)44.0% fail first time43.52024446
Stoke-on-Trent (ST)43.8% fail first time43.52024749
Doncaster (DN)43.5% fail first time43.52024680
Walsall (WS) (rough estimate: 285 tests, 95% interval 37.9–49.3%)43.5% fail first time43.52024285
Blackburn (BB) (rough estimate: 442 tests, 95% interval 38.7–47.9%)43.2% fail first time43.52024442
Wigan (WN) (rough estimate: 172 tests, 95% interval 35.9–50.5%)43.0% fail first time43.52024172
Uxbridge (UB) (rough estimate: 326 tests, 95% interval 37.1–47.8%)42.3% fail first time43.52024326
Brighton (BN)42.3% fail first time43.52024916
Norwich (NR)42.2% fail first time43.52024741
Liverpool (L) (rough estimate: 433 tests, 95% interval 37.5–46.7%)42.0% fail first time43.52024433
Redhill (RH) (rough estimate: 361 tests, 95% interval 36.9–47.0%)41.8% fail first time43.52024361
London NW (NW) (rough estimate: 381 tests, 95% interval 36.9–46.7%)41.7% fail first time43.52024381
Chester (CH)41.5% fail first time43.52024843
London E (E) (rough estimate: 482 tests, 95% interval 37.2–45.9%)41.5% fail first time43.52024482
Shrewsbury (SY) (rough estimate: 255 tests, 95% interval 35.3–47.3%)41.2% fail first time43.52024255
Derby (DE) (rough estimate: 476 tests, 95% interval 36.6–45.4%)41.0% fail first time43.52024476
Manchester (M)40.8% fail first time43.52024927
Bradford (BD) (rough estimate: 349 tests, 95% interval 35.7–45.9%)40.7% fail first time43.52024349
Guildford (GU)40.5% fail first time43.52024548
Bromley (BR) (rough estimate: 173 tests, 95% interval 33.4–47.9%)40.5% fail first time43.52024173
Southampton (SO)40.4% fail first time43.52024811
Taunton (TA) (rough estimate: 411 tests, 95% interval 35.5–45.0%)40.1% fail first time43.52024411
Tonbridge (TN)40.1% fail first time43.52024756
Llandudno (LL)40.0% fail first time43.52024622
Oxford (OX) (rough estimate: 468 tests, 95% interval 35.6–44.5%)40.0% fail first time43.52024468
Coventry (CV)39.9% fail first time43.52024559
Medway (ME)39.7% fail first time43.52024536
Peterborough (PE)39.7% fail first time43.52024816
Harrow (HA) (rough estimate: 378 tests, 95% interval 34.9–44.7%)39.7% fail first time43.52024378
Hemel Hempstead (HP) (rough estimate: 278 tests, 95% interval 34.0–45.4%)39.6% fail first time43.52024278
Halifax (HX) (rough estimate: 112 tests, 95% interval 30.7–48.5%)39.3% fail first time43.52024112
London N (N) (rough estimate: 405 tests, 95% interval 34.6–44.1%)39.3% fail first time43.52024405
Sheffield (S)39.0% fail first time43.520241145
London SW (SW) (rough estimate: 171 tests, 95% interval 31.6–46.1%)38.6% fail first time43.52024171
London SE (SE) (rough estimate: 497 tests, 95% interval 34.1–42.6%)38.2% fail first time43.52024497
Hereford (HR) (rough estimate: 166 tests, 95% interval 30.9–45.5%)38.0% fail first time43.52024166
Bolton (BL) (rough estimate: 330 tests, 95% interval 32.8–43.2%)37.9% fail first time43.52024330
Wakefield (WF) (rough estimate: 376 tests, 95% interval 32.5–42.2%)37.2% fail first time43.52024376
Colchester (CO)37.0% fail first time43.52024611
Reading (RG)37.0% fail first time43.52024525
Wolverhampton (WV) (rough estimate: 346 tests, 95% interval 31.5–41.6%)36.4% fail first time43.52024346
Twickenham (TW) (rough estimate: 360 tests, 95% interval 31.6–41.5%)36.4% fail first time43.52024360
Warrington (WA) (rough estimate: 398 tests, 95% interval 31.4–40.8%)35.9% fail first time43.52024398
Dudley (DY)35.9% fail first time43.52024657
Dartford (DA)35.7% fail first time43.52024571
Birmingham (B)35.0% fail first time43.520242022
Canterbury (CT)34.7% fail first time43.52024688
Ilford (IG) (rough estimate: 251 tests, 95% interval 29.0–40.7%)34.7% fail first time43.52024251
Leicester (LE)34.6% fail first time43.520241040
Chelmsford (CM)34.5% fail first time43.52024623
Kingston upon Thames (KT) (rough estimate: 378 tests, 95% interval 29.8–39.3%)34.4% fail first time43.52024378
Watford (WD) (rough estimate: 271 tests, 95% interval 28.9–40.2%)34.3% fail first time43.52024271
Stevenage (SG) (rough estimate: 408 tests, 95% interval 29.4–38.5%)33.8% fail first time43.52024408
Croydon (CR) (rough estimate: 358 tests, 95% interval 28.8–38.6%)33.5% fail first time43.52024358
Milton Keynes (MK)32.9% fail first time43.52024694
Romford (RM) (rough estimate: 385 tests, 95% interval 28.2–37.6%)32.7% fail first time43.52024385
Sutton (SM) (rough estimate: 203 tests, 95% interval 26.4–39.2%)32.5% fail first time43.52024203
Southend-on-Sea (SS)31.3% fail first time43.52024902

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does a Hyundai Amica rust more than average?

Allowing for age, Hyundai Amica MOTs record corrosion failures at 8.2 times the national rate: 6.27% of tests against 0.77% (2024 + geographic layers, n = 5,765).

Computed, not measured.

slope · Hyundai Amica · Salt belt susceptibility · 8.2 vs 1 · 2024 + geographic layers
Salt belt susceptibility: 1 vs 8.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2024 + geographic layers)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Salt belt susceptibility8.2ratio estimate12024 + geographic layers5765

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 + geographic layers · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is a Hyundai Amica ULEZ compliant?

An estimated 82.4% of Hyundai Amicas tested are likely ULEZ-compliant, judged from fuel type and first-use date; check a specific car with TfL's vehicle checker (2024).

Computed, not measured.

stacked · Hyundai Amica · Likely compliant · 82.4 vs baseline · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Likely compliant82.4% estimate20245785

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What do six years of MOTs show about owning a Hyundai Amica?

Of failed Hyundai Amica MOTs, 34.9% were retested the same day and a further 61.3% within 10 days; the median failed car passed its retest after 1 day (2019–2024, n = 13,764).

bar · Hyundai Amica · Same-day retest · 34.9 vs failed initial tests · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Same-day retest34.9%failed initial tests2019–202413764
Retest within 10 days61.3%failed initial tests2019–202413764
Clean MOT streak26.7%observed chains2019–20248680
Repeat advisory41.6%observed chains2019–20248680
Decreasing odometer1.0% mileage anomalyobserved chains2019–202410023

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is low mileage better for a Hyundai Amica?

Hyundai Amicas aged 11 to 14 doing under 5,000 miles a year failed first time in 33.3% of tests, against 50.9% for those doing 8,000 to 12,000 miles (2019–2024, n = 13,796).

bullet · Hyundai Amica · Low-use first-time failure · 33.3 vs 50.9 · 2019–2024
Low-use first-time failure: 33.3 vs 50.9. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Low-use first-time failure33.3%50.92019–202413796
Low-use gap-17.6percentage points8–12k miles2019–202413796

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

If a Hyundai Amica fails, does it fail again?

42.3% of Hyundai Amicas that failed an MOT failed the next one too, against 35.1% after a pass (2019–2024, n = 4,519). The failure most likely to come back is seat belts and supplementary restraint systems: 42.4% of those fails recurred at the next MOT.

bullet · Hyundai Amica · Repeat after fail · 42.3 vs 35.1 · 2019–2024
Repeat after fail: 42.3 vs 35.1. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Repeat after fail42.3%35.12019–20244519

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Hyundai Amica faults come together?

On Hyundai Amicas, ‘body, chassis, structure’ and ‘noise, emissions and leaks’ failures turn up together 3.8 times as often as chance would predict (2024, n = 1,503).

Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Body, chassis, structure + Noise, emissions and leaks3.8liftexpected joint rate20241503
Noise, emissions and leaks + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 143 tests, 95% interval 3.1–4.3)3.7liftexpected joint rate2024143
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Road Wheels (rough estimate: 28 tests, 95% interval 2.3–5.1)3.5liftexpected joint rate202428
Steering + Suspension (rough estimate: 420 tests, 95% interval 3.0–3.6)3.3liftexpected joint rate2024420
Identification of the vehicle + Tyres (rough estimate: 89 tests, 95% interval 2.5–3.8)3.1liftexpected joint rate202489
Identification of the vehicle + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (rough estimate: 162 tests, 95% interval 2.6–3.5)3.0liftexpected joint rate2024162
Brakes + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 191 tests, 95% interval 2.6–3.4)3.0liftexpected joint rate2024191
Identification of the vehicle + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 63 tests, 95% interval 2.3–3.8)3.0liftexpected joint rate202463
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Brakes + Noise, emissions and leaks2.9liftexpected joint rate20241205
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 284 tests, 95% interval 2.6–3.3)2.9liftexpected joint rate2024284
Body, chassis, structure + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 181 tests, 95% interval 2.5–3.3)2.9liftexpected joint rate2024181
Identification of the vehicle + Visibility (rough estimate: 78 tests, 95% interval 2.2–3.5)2.8liftexpected joint rate202478
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Suspension (rough estimate: 166 tests, 95% interval 2.2–3.0)2.6liftexpected joint rate2024166
Brakes + Suspension2.6liftexpected joint rate20241749
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Noise, emissions and leaks2.6liftexpected joint rate20241620
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Steering (rough estimate: 32 tests, 95% interval 1.8–3.6)2.6liftexpected joint rate202432
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Visibility (rough estimate: 128 tests, 95% interval 2.1–3.1)2.6liftexpected joint rate2024128
Body, chassis, structure + Identification of the vehicle (rough estimate: 89 tests, 95% interval 2.1–3.2)2.6liftexpected joint rate202489
Body, chassis, structure + Brakes2.5liftexpected joint rate20241688
Body, chassis, structure + Steering (rough estimate: 324 tests, 95% interval 2.3–2.8)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024324
Noise, emissions and leaks + Steering (rough estimate: 199 tests, 95% interval 2.2–2.9)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024199
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Visibility2.5liftexpected joint rate20242006
Brakes + Tyres2.5liftexpected joint rate20241362
Brakes + Steering (rough estimate: 325 tests, 95% interval 2.2–2.8)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024325
Brakes + Identification of the vehicle (rough estimate: 88 tests, 95% interval 2.0–3.1)2.5liftexpected joint rate202488
Noise, emissions and leaks + Visibility2.5liftexpected joint rate2024782
Brakes + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment2.4liftexpected joint rate20242523
Body, chassis, structure + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment2.4liftexpected joint rate20242423
Noise, emissions and leaks + Suspension2.4liftexpected joint rate2024967
Noise, emissions and leaks + Tyres2.4liftexpected joint rate2024797
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Steering (rough estimate: 478 tests, 95% interval 2.2–2.6)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024478
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Tyres2.3liftexpected joint rate20241954
Brakes + Visibility2.3liftexpected joint rate20241233
Body, chassis, structure + Suspension2.3liftexpected joint rate20241516
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Tyres (rough estimate: 116 tests, 95% interval 1.8–2.7)2.2liftexpected joint rate2024116
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Suspension2.2liftexpected joint rate20242256
Tyres + Visibility2.2liftexpected joint rate2024947
Steering + Tyres (rough estimate: 231 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.5)2.2liftexpected joint rate2024231
Identification of the vehicle + Suspension (rough estimate: 76 tests, 95% interval 1.7–2.7)2.2liftexpected joint rate202476
Steering + Visibility (rough estimate: 219 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.5)2.2liftexpected joint rate2024219
Body, chassis, structure + Visibility2.1liftexpected joint rate20241099
Body, chassis, structure + Tyres2.1liftexpected joint rate20241105
Suspension + Visibility2.0liftexpected joint rate20241022
Suspension + Tyres1.9liftexpected joint rate20241048
Road Wheels + Suspension (seen together; too few for a multiplier)19tests with both202419
Body, chassis, structure + Road Wheels (seen together; too few for a multiplier)18tests with both202418
Road Wheels + Visibility (seen together; too few for a multiplier)16tests with both202416
Brakes + Road Wheels (seen together; too few for a multiplier)16tests with both202416
Identification of the vehicle + Steering (seen together; too few for a multiplier)14tests with both202414
Road Wheels + Tyres (seen together; too few for a multiplier)12tests with both202412
Noise, emissions and leaks + Road Wheels (seen together; too few for a multiplier)11tests with both202411
Identification of the vehicle + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (seen together; too few for a multiplier)9tests with both20249

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What does a Hyundai Amica cost to run in a fleet?

Of every 100 Hyundai Amicas tested at age 16, about 40 failed the MOT first time (rough estimate); at age 18, about 44 (rough estimate). These are one-year rates for different cars tested in the same year, not a fleet followed over time (2024).

Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 16 (rough estimate: 877 tests, 95% interval 37.0–43.5%)40.3% fail first time2024877
Age 1741.1% fail first time20242085
Age 18 (rough estimate: 1,793 tests, 95% interval 41.8–46.4%)44.1% fail first time20241793

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does the month of a Hyundai Amica MOT matter?

Hyundai Amicas fail first time most in May (43.2%, against 28.8% for all cars that month) and least in March (40.1%) (2024, n = 5,785).

line · Hyundai Amica · January · 42.3 vs 31.1 · 2024
January: 42.3. December: 40.3. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Hyundai Amica: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
January42.3% fail first time31.120244947
February42.0% fail first time30.020244484
March40.1% fail first time28.320245297
April42.5% fail first time29.820242860
May43.2% fail first time28.820243127
June41.6% fail first time28.120243564
July41.6% fail first time29.320244039
August42.1% fail first time29.220244241
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
September41.8% fail first time28.220244906
October42.4% fail first time30.320245096
November41.4% fail first time30.620244370
December40.3% fail first time29.320242774

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Not enough tests for… (and why)

Does the Hyundai Amica fail inspections in other countries too?

no match in the other-country inspection register. 5,785 initial Hyundai Amica tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: Statens vegvesen PKK (CC BY 4.0), Traficom Katsastus (CC BY 4.0), RDW APK (CC0), adapted; covers 430 of 761 models · Window: 2024 by country · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

See the Skoda Rapid, a car of the same inspection class with 3.9× the tests · Check your car by registration

Real-world MPG against the official figure (manufacturer level)

layer not yet computed for this model (covers 19 of 761 models). 5,785 initial Hyundai Amica tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: European Commission OBFCM; covers 19 of 761 models · Window: 2021+ cohorts · n = 5,785 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

See the Skoda Rapid, a car of the same inspection class with 3.9× the tests · Check your car by registration

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Hyundai Amica MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 24 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/hyundai-amica/

How the MOT Risk Index and every figure on this page are calculated: methodology.

Report an error

What is wrong on this page? One tap sends the category only, no text and nothing about you.

Hyundai Amica MOT: quick answers

What is the Hyundai Amica first-time MOT pass rate?

56.5% of first attempts passed in 2024 (5,785 tests). Retests after repair are excluded; cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) are shown separately.

Why does this number differ from other sites?

Other sites may count retests or all attempts. This page uses 5,785 primary tests: 43.46% failed first time and 66.3% passed when cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) count as passes. The age-adjusted MOT Risk Index 101.2 is shown separately.