MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Ford Transit 2003: MOT failure rate for its age

48.2% of 25,244 MOT tests of the Ford Transit first registered in 2003 failed at the first attempt (2019–2024; retests excluded). Against this model's own normal rate at the same ages the index is 103.1 (95% CI 101.3–105.0; 100 = normal for this model at that age): close to other build years of the same model at the same age (within 5 points of normal).

Ford Transit built in 2003 at a glance
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Failed first time48.2%all ages tested2019–202425244
Index against this model at the same age (95% CI 101.3–105.0)103.1index100 = normal for this model at that age2019–202425244
Rank among this model's 23 build years16of 231 = fails least for its age2019–202425244
Tested in 20242161testsmedian 124,809 miles20242161
line · Ford Transit built 2003 · first-time MOT failure share by age · built 2003 49.5% vs model normal 51.8% at age 16 · 2019–2024
Built 2003 against Ford Transit normal for the age: first-time MOT failure share at each age, age 16: 49.5% vs 51.8%; age 17: 49.3% vs 47%; age 18: 48.9% vs 46.2%; age 19: 47.2% vs 43.6%; age 20: 46.6% vs 43%; age 21: 44.1% vs 40.6%. Axis from 0% to 60%. DVSA MOT bulk data, 2019–2024.

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · page updated 30 Sep 2026 · full dataset (v5).

How does the 2003 Ford Transit fail at each age?

Cars built in 2003 were tested at ages 16 to 21 between 2019 and 2024. Each row compares their first-time failure share with what this model normally shows at that age, after allowing for the overall failure level of each test year.

Ford Transit built 2003: first-time MOT failure by age, against the model's normal rate at that age (2019–2024)
AgeTestsFailed, %95% intervalNormal for this model at that age, %Index (100 = normal)
167,29849.548.4–50.751.895.6
174,95749.347.9–50.747104.8
184,38848.947.4–50.446.2105.9
193,61247.245.6–48.843.6108.3
202,82846.644.8–48.443108.3
212,16144.142–46.240.6108.6

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 25,244 (initial tests) · Method: normal rate = this model's first-time failure share at that age across its build years (cells of 400+ tests), adjusted for each test year's overall level; cells of 30+ tests, under 500 marked rough · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What fails most on the 2003 Ford Transit?

The most common failure group on cars built in 2003 is suspension: 78.6 items per 100 first tests, against 30.1 across all build years of the Ford Transit. These counts are not age-adjusted: cars built in 2003 were tested at ages 16 to 21.

Failure items per 100 first tests, Ford Transit built 2003 against the Ford Transit in all build years (2019–2024, not age-adjusted)
Failure groupBuilt 2003, per 100All build years, per 100Items
Suspension78.630.119,840
Body, chassis, structure57.219.214,444
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment45.234.711,399
Brakes32.822.18,273
Visibility27.118.56,847

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 25,244 (initial tests of this build year) · Method: failure items grouped by DVSA's top-level defect groups, per 100 initial tests; groups with 30+ items · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does 2003 compare with the years around it?

Among the 23 published build years of the Ford Transit, 2003 ranks 16 (1 = fails least for its age). 2002: index 101.3. 2004: index 98.9.

Ford Transit build years: index against the model at the same age (2019–2024)
Build yearIndex (100 = normal)95% intervalVerdictTests
199894.288.3–100.0no different (rough estimate)2,410
199989.184.6–93.7better (rough estimate)3,824
200091.587.7–95.2better5,700
200199.696.9–102.3no different11,870
2002101.399.3–103.3no different21,002
2003103.1101.3–105.0worse25,244
200498.997.2–100.7no different25,628
200598.496.9–99.9better34,564
200698.297.1–99.3better60,741
200798.998.0–99.8better90,418
2008101.1100.3–102.0worse104,206
2009101.1100.2–102.1worse82,126
2010103.2102.3–104.1worse111,738
2011106.7105.8–107.5worse127,682
2012116.7115.7–117.7worse103,257
2013112.3111.3–113.2worse129,347
201489.188.4–89.9better177,125
201591.690.9–92.3better217,023
201693.592.7–94.2better251,501
201795.894.9–96.6better231,973
2018104.2102.6–105.7worse77,084
2019120.6115.1–126.1worse8,094
2020115.8106.1–125.4worse (rough estimate)2,832

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 1,905,389 (initial tests) · Method: observed failures against those expected for the same model at the same ages, test-year level adjusted; verdict follows the printed one-decimal bound · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Ford Transit 2003 MOT statistics (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 30 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/ford-transit/2003/

How every figure is calculated: methodology. Age, test year and build year are tied together (age = test year − build year), so the test-year level is taken as observed, not estimated.

Other pages for this model

Ford Transit 1998 · Ford Transit 1999 · Ford Transit 2000 · Ford Transit 2001 · Ford Transit 2002 · Ford Transit 2004 · Ford Transit 2005 · Ford Transit 2006 · Ford Transit 2007 · Ford Transit 2008 · Ford Transit 2009 · Ford Transit 2010 · Ford Transit 2011 · Ford Transit 2012 · Ford Transit 2013 · Ford Transit 2014 · Ford Transit 2015 · Ford Transit 2016 · Ford Transit 2017 · Ford Transit 2018 · Ford Transit 2019 · Ford Transit 2020 · Ford Transit in Norway · Ford Transit in Finland · Ford Transit in the Netherlands · Ford Transit by postcode area · Ford Transit body, chassis and structure failures · Ford Transit brakes failures · Ford Transit vehicle identification failures · Ford Transit lamps, reflectors and electrics failures · Ford Transit noise, emissions and leaks failures · Ford Transit road wheels failures · Ford Transit seat belts and airbags failures · Ford Transit steering failures · Ford Transit suspension failures · Ford Transit tyres failures · Ford Transit visibility failures