MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Ford Transit 2002: MOT failure rate for its age

46.2% of 21,002 MOT tests of the Ford Transit first registered in 2002 failed at the first attempt (2019–2024; retests excluded). Against this model's own normal rate at the same ages the index is 101.3 (95% CI 99.3–103.3; 100 = normal for this model at that age): the 2002 build year is no different from other years of the same model at the same age.

Ford Transit built in 2002 at a glance
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Failed first time46.2%all ages tested2019–202421002
Index against this model at the same age (95% CI 99.3–103.3)101.3index100 = normal for this model at that age2019–202421002
Rank among this model's 23 build years15of 231 = fails least for its age2019–202421002
Tested in 20241807testsmedian 119,634 miles20241807
line · Ford Transit built 2002 · first-time MOT failure share by age · built 2002 48.6% vs model normal 50.7% at age 17 · 2019–2024
Built 2002 against Ford Transit normal for the age: first-time MOT failure share at each age, age 17: 48.6% vs 50.7%; age 18: 46.4% vs 46.6%; age 19: 47.3% vs 45%; age 20: 45.9% vs 42.8%; age 21: 42.2% vs 40.8%; age 22: 40.9% vs 38.3%. Axis from 0% to 60%. DVSA MOT bulk data, 2019–2024.

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · page updated 30 Sep 2026 · full dataset (v5).

How does the 2002 Ford Transit fail at each age?

Cars built in 2002 were tested at ages 17 to 22 between 2019 and 2024. Each row compares their first-time failure share with what this model normally shows at that age, after allowing for the overall failure level of each test year.

Ford Transit built 2002: first-time MOT failure by age, against the model's normal rate at that age (2019–2024)
AgeTestsFailed, %95% intervalNormal for this model at that age, %Index (100 = normal)
176,01748.647.4–49.950.795.9
184,08146.444.9–4846.699.6
193,69847.345.7–48.945105
203,01045.944.1–47.742.8107.3
212,38942.240.3–44.240.8103.5
221,80740.938.7–43.238.3106.7

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 21,002 (initial tests) · Method: normal rate = this model's first-time failure share at that age across its build years (cells of 400+ tests), adjusted for each test year's overall level; cells of 30+ tests, under 500 marked rough · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What fails most on the 2002 Ford Transit?

The most common failure group on cars built in 2002 is suspension: 76.1 items per 100 first tests, against 30.1 across all build years of the Ford Transit. These counts are not age-adjusted: cars built in 2002 were tested at ages 17 to 22.

Failure items per 100 first tests, Ford Transit built 2002 against the Ford Transit in all build years (2019–2024, not age-adjusted)
Failure groupBuilt 2002, per 100All build years, per 100Items
Suspension76.130.115,979
Body, chassis, structure51.919.210,907
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment46.334.79,715
Brakes29.922.16,280
Visibility25.618.55,374

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 21,002 (initial tests of this build year) · Method: failure items grouped by DVSA's top-level defect groups, per 100 initial tests; groups with 30+ items · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does 2002 compare with the years around it?

Among the 23 published build years of the Ford Transit, 2002 ranks 15 (1 = fails least for its age). 2001: index 99.6. 2003: index 103.1.

Ford Transit build years: index against the model at the same age (2019–2024)
Build yearIndex (100 = normal)95% intervalVerdictTests
199894.288.3–100.0no different (rough estimate)2,410
199989.184.6–93.7better (rough estimate)3,824
200091.587.7–95.2better5,700
200199.696.9–102.3no different11,870
2002101.399.3–103.3no different21,002
2003103.1101.3–105.0worse25,244
200498.997.2–100.7no different25,628
200598.496.9–99.9better34,564
200698.297.1–99.3better60,741
200798.998.0–99.8better90,418
2008101.1100.3–102.0worse104,206
2009101.1100.2–102.1worse82,126
2010103.2102.3–104.1worse111,738
2011106.7105.8–107.5worse127,682
2012116.7115.7–117.7worse103,257
2013112.3111.3–113.2worse129,347
201489.188.4–89.9better177,125
201591.690.9–92.3better217,023
201693.592.7–94.2better251,501
201795.894.9–96.6better231,973
2018104.2102.6–105.7worse77,084
2019120.6115.1–126.1worse8,094
2020115.8106.1–125.4worse (rough estimate)2,832

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 1,905,389 (initial tests) · Method: observed failures against those expected for the same model at the same ages, test-year level adjusted; verdict follows the printed one-decimal bound · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Ford Transit 2002 MOT statistics (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 30 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/ford-transit/2002/

How every figure is calculated: methodology. Age, test year and build year are tied together (age = test year − build year), so the test-year level is taken as observed, not estimated.

Other pages for this model

Ford Transit 1998 · Ford Transit 1999 · Ford Transit 2000 · Ford Transit 2001 · Ford Transit 2003 · Ford Transit 2004 · Ford Transit 2005 · Ford Transit 2006 · Ford Transit 2007 · Ford Transit 2008 · Ford Transit 2009 · Ford Transit 2010 · Ford Transit 2011 · Ford Transit 2012 · Ford Transit 2013 · Ford Transit 2014 · Ford Transit 2015 · Ford Transit 2016 · Ford Transit 2017 · Ford Transit 2018 · Ford Transit 2019 · Ford Transit 2020 · Ford Transit in Norway · Ford Transit in Finland · Ford Transit in the Netherlands · Ford Transit by postcode area · Ford Transit body, chassis and structure failures · Ford Transit brakes failures · Ford Transit vehicle identification failures · Ford Transit lamps, reflectors and electrics failures · Ford Transit noise, emissions and leaks failures · Ford Transit road wheels failures · Ford Transit seat belts and airbags failures · Ford Transit steering failures · Ford Transit suspension failures · Ford Transit tyres failures · Ford Transit visibility failures