MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Citroen Dispatch — MOT statistics 2024

The Citroen Dispatch failed 40.85% of 47,069 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 152.3 (100 = expected for its age profile). This van fails its MOT about 52% more often than expected for its age.

MOT risk index 152.3, 95% CI 150.7–154.0 (100 = national average) 100 152.3 0 200
Index
152.3
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
40.85%
n = 47,069
Dangerous /100
15
national ≈11
Rank
746 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Vauxhall Vivaro (index 151.9) — the two published results are 0.4 index points apart.

Citroen Dispatch common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Body, chassis, structure stand out at 25.7 per 100 tests, against 11.0 per 100 tests across UK vans and pickups of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Citroen Dispatch common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vans and pickups of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Lamps & electrical40.5110,94028.81.41×1.40–1.42
Body & structure25.770,49011.02.33×2.32–2.36
Suspension19.553,42321.50.91×0.90–0.92
Visibility18.650,94214.61.27×1.26–1.28
Brakes17.246,96018.00.96×0.95–0.96
Tyres9.425,6788.11.16×1.14–1.17
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 273,806 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot…A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc9.631.566.18×Ask the seller about: A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or
Transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot…A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely deteriorated7.821.485.29×Ask the seller about: A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely d
Rear registration plate lamp or light source…A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources8.752.833.09×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a…A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning6.902.093.30×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the…Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen5.032.222.26×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn7.424.871.52×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Windscreen or window damaged or seriously…Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view4.862.362.06×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Stop lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of…Stop lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning3.981.502.66×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mma brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm3.812.151.77×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the…Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements4.593.591.28×Check tyre tread depth across the full width

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Citroen Dispatch MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Brakes are highest at 39.1 per 100 tests; Non-component advisories are lowest at 7.1 per 100 tests — the gap is 32.0 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Citroen Dispatch MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Brakes39.1
Tyres34.9
Suspension19.1
Emissions & leaks13.9
Body & structure7.8
Non-component advisories7.1

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

Tyres, brakes and suspension: Citroen Dispatch against cars of the same age

AgePartCitroen DispatchSame age, petrol and dieselDifference
3 yearsTyres4.954.170.78
3 yearsBrakes6.231.774.46
3 yearsSuspension0.730.630.10
4 yearsTyres5.74.541.16
4 yearsBrakes6.222.433.79
4 yearsSuspension1.881.210.67
5 yearsTyres6.15.061.04
5 yearsBrakes6.533.093.44
5 yearsSuspension3.342.191.15
6 yearsTyres6.565.541.02
6 yearsBrakes6.963.813.15
6 yearsSuspension4.953.721.23
7 yearsTyres6.635.950.68
7 yearsBrakes7.694.553.14
7 yearsSuspension7.555.681.87
8 yearsTyres6.966.310.65
8 yearsBrakes9.445.384.06
8 yearsSuspension10.287.782.50

Failing items per 100 initial tests, 2019-2024. The comparison group is every petrol or diesel car tested at the same age, so weight and drivetrain show up rather than fleet age.

If a van like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed44.0%26,089
It passed36.0%113,237

A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 8.0 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is visibility — 40.4% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every van with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 260,109 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only151.7fails more often than expected
Age and annual mileage134.9fails more often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year1.7%a normal spread of use

Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 16.8 points — this fleet works harder than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view penalises it — but it does not change which side of normal the van sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Citroen Dispatch compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against other light commercials tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

AgeCitroen DispatchSame class, same ageDifferenceTests
3 years26.85%19.81%+7.03 pp26,294
4 years30.88%22.82%+8.06 pp25,469
5 years33.48%25.32%+8.16 pp25,268
6 years36.95%28.78%+8.18 pp23,537
7 years41.32%32.19%+9.13 pp20,971
8 years47.25%35.47%+11.78 pp18,844
9 years49.96%38.24%+11.72 pp17,842
10 years49.45%40.74%+8.72 pp15,500
11 years51.02%42.94%+8.08 pp14,986
12 years50.67%44.8%+5.87 pp14,958
13 years49.76%46.01%+3.75 pp14,416
14 years51%46.78%+4.22 pp13,308
15 years50.95%47.32%+3.62 pp11,665
16 years51.73%47.5%+4.23 pp9,661
17 years51.15%47.45%+3.7 pp7,210
18 years51.57%47.39%+4.18 pp4,795
19 years52.18%46.87%+5.31 pp3,264
20 years48.19%46.06%+2.13 pp2,100

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Citroen Dispatch perform as it gets older?

The Dispatch at age 9 stands out at 50.0%, against 26.5% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the Citroen Dispatch perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: van age, years · failure-rate scale 0–55%.

Takeaway: a 10-year-old Dispatch has roughly a 48% chance of failing its MOT; from about age 3 it stays above the national age curve.

Data table
AgeCitroen DispatchAll vehiclesGap
329.7%12.4%+17.3 pp
429.9%13.1%+16.8 pp
528.7%15.1%+13.6 pp
628.5%17.5%+11.0 pp
730.5%20.2%+10.3 pp
844.7%23.3%+21.4 pp
950.0%26.5%+23.5 pp
1047.9%30.1%+17.8 pp
1150.1%33.2%+17.0 pp
1249.6%35.7%+13.9 pp
1350.4%38.2%+12.3 pp
1449.0%40.4%+8.6 pp
1549.9%41.6%+8.3 pp
1649.3%43.1%+6.2 pp
1749.7%43.1%+6.6 pp
1850.6%43.9%+6.7 pp
1950.5%43.5%+7.0 pp
2048.7%41.0%+7.7 pp

Is a Citroen Dispatch ULEZ compliant?

The share of classifiable 2024 Citroen Dispatch MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 52.9%.

Based on 46,839 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.

higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class

Age-band estimate from classifiable initial MOT tests
Vehicle age at testLikely ULEZ-compliant shareTests
Under 3 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 80
3–5 years100.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 10,476
6–7 years100.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 8,812
8 years100.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 3,631
9 years39.9%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 4,120
10–14 years0.5%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 11,621
15–17 years1.2%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 5,045
18 years0.1%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 980
19 years0.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 744
20+ years0.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 1,330

How dangerous are Citroen Dispatch MOT failures?

Major defects stand out at 94.0 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Citroen Dispatch MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor31.4514.222.21×
Major93.9952.751.78×
Dangerous14.9811.151.34×

Chart values: Minor 31.4 · Major 94.0 · Dangerous 15.0.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Citroen Dispatch MOT matter?

Jan is highest at 43.7%; May is lowest at 41.4% — the gap is 2.3 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Citroen Dispatch MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 27%–45%.

bars: Citroen Dispatch · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthCitroen DispatchAll vehiclesGap
Jan43.67%31.12%+12.6 pp
Feb43.25%29.99%+13.3 pp
Mar42.51%28.26%+14.2 pp
Apr43.1%29.78%+13.3 pp
May41.37%28.79%+12.6 pp
Jun41.75%28.15%+13.6 pp
Jul42.38%29.33%+13.1 pp
Aug43.24%29.2%+14.0 pp
Sep41.83%28.19%+13.6 pp
Oct42.91%30.34%+12.6 pp
Nov43.25%30.58%+12.7 pp
Dec42.07%29.33%+12.7 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 2.3 percentage points — booking month barely matters for this family. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Citroen Dispatch average mileage by age

At age 8, the middle half of Dispatch models runs from 67,924 miles to 118,282 miles, against 90,824 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Bars: Citroen Dispatch · dashed: all class-4 cars — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: van age, years · odometer scale 0–188k mi.

Does high mileage mean more Citroen Dispatch MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 6–9, 18.8% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 48% of those with over 140,000 miles.Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.

Does high mileage mean more Citroen Dispatch MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
Citroen Dispatch: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
3–5<40k miles24.9%23.4–26.6%2,844
3–540-70k miles29.9%28.5–31.3%4,291
3–570-100k miles32.9%31–34.9%2,244
3–5100-140k miles29.2%26.4–32.3%920
3–5140k+ miles43.1%36–50.5%174 (rough estimate)
6–9<40k miles18.8%16.8–21%1,276
6–940-70k miles30.3%29–31.8%4,172
6–970-100k miles39.7%38.4–41.1%5,070
6–9100-140k miles44.7%43.2–46.2%4,206
6–9140k+ miles48%45.7–50.2%1,835
10–14<40k miles26.7%22–31.9%300 (rough estimate)
10–1440-70k miles41.6%38.9–44.4%1,219
10–1470-100k miles48.4%46.4–50.3%2,539
10–14100-140k miles51%49.4–52.6%3,723
10–14140k+ miles52.4%50.8–54%3,821
15+<40k miles31.5%23.5–40.7%108 (rough estimate)
15+40-70k miles38.9%34.3–43.7%406 (rough estimate)
15+70-100k miles45.2%42.2–48.3%1,039
15+100-140k miles49.7%47.7–51.8%2,185
15+140k+ miles51.4%49.7–53.1%3,192

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
329,90743,50460,3333,150
440,76556,34175,0233,099
546,70765,40890,3144,227
652,24971,98198,4084,376
762,02283,971108,7094,436
867,92490,824118,2823,631
973,774100,238131,7544,120
1079,583105,405136,5043,286
1182,690111,508143,0382,535
1291,185120,527157,0871,812
1398,107130,104165,2011,977
14102,940135,199170,5302,063
15100,677132,226170,9941,564
16109,763140,109178,6791,861
17111,969142,751177,2571,647
1898,655127,871158,400980
1994,336120,399153,430744
20+94,424127,140162,3411,330

A typical 8-year-old Dispatch has ~90,824 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Citroen Dispatch fails its MOT most

Llandrindod Wells area is highest at 55.2%; London E area is lowest at 22.2% — the gap is 33.1 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Where in Britain the Citroen Dispatch fails its MOT most — 2024 UK MOT data
Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Llandrindod Wells (LD)55.23%+12.6 pp
Kirkcaldy (KY)52.84%+10.2 pp
Truro (TR)52.35%+9.7 pp
Torquay (TQ)51.94%+9.3 pp
Dundee (DD)51.76%+9.1 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
London E (E)22.18%-20.5 pp
Sutton (SM)29.39%-13.3 pp
Romford (RM)30.17%-12.5 pp
Croydon (CR)30.76%-11.9 pp
London SE (SE)31.22%-11.4 pp

Why do areas differ?

For each external factor we correlate the area fail rate with the factor across postcode areas that have ≥800 tests of this family, then compare the bottom vs top fifth (quintile) of the factor. Correlation, not causation — factors travel together (the north is colder and often poorer; urban areas are denser and less salted). Road surface condition is joined now, for the 91 English areas the DfT publishes, and it explains nothing: the correlation with suspension failures is −0.01 and with body and structure failures 0.07. Potholes wreck wheels and tyres between tests, but by the time a car reaches the bay the road it drives on leaves no measurable trace.

In areas with the highest mot centre density this model fails 11.4 pp more often than in the lowest fifth (r=0.65, n=108 areas with ≥800 tests).

In areas with the highest urban share this model fails 9.7 pp less often than in the lowest fifth (r=-0.55, n=108 areas with ≥800 tests).

In the most coastal fifth of areas this model fails 4.4 pp more often than in the most inland fifth (r=-0.24, n=108 areas with ≥800 tests).

Citroen Dispatch Why do areas differ? — 2024 UK MOT data
Values shown in the quintile chart
FactorLow QHigh QGapCorrelation
MOT centre density34.9%46.2%+11.3 ppr=0.65
Urban share45.6%35.9%-9.7 ppr=-0.55
Distance to coast46.0%41.6%-4.4 ppr=-0.24

Factors that only mean something combined

Some conditions are useless on their own and informative multiplied together. Frost days alone say little — Britain barely freezes. Salt tonnage alone says little — it tracks frost. Distance to the sea alone says little. Multiply the first two and divide by the third and you get an index of how hard an area attacks a car's underside, and it lines up with the corrosion defects we actually record. We built five such combinations and tested each against our own data. Three survived; two did not, and the failures are listed here on purpose — a proxy that was never checked is decoration. One survivor only survived on the second attempt: built from a crude stand-in for street parking it failed outright, and rebuilt from the census — terraced streets carrying more cars than they have driveways — it works, and carries information the salt index does not.

Composite area indicators, each tested against a defect rate we measure
CompositeBuilt fromTested againstrVerdict
Underbody corrosionfrost days × salt load ÷ (distance to coast + 1)share of tests with a corrosion defect+0.42holds (116 areas)
Tyre wearrain days × annual miles ÷ age at first tyre advisoryshare of tests failing on tyres+0.45holds (116 areas)
Overnight corrosionterraced housing × cars per household × frost daysshare with a corrosion defect+0.41holds (102 areas) — and adds signal beyond the first index
Deferred maintenancedeprivation × advisory-to-failure conversion ÷ labour ratecars repeating the same advisory−0.26fails (118 areas)
Powertrain stressengine capacity ÷ kerb weightsuspension, brake and emissions failures−0.16fails (22 models)

The deprivation result is the one worth dwelling on. The intuition that poorer areas defer repairs is strong enough that most people treat it as established. We tested it twice — once on raw failure rates (r = 0.04) and again, more fairly, on whether an advisory turns into a failure — and it did not hold any of the three times we tried it — on raw failure rates, on advisory-to-failure conversion, and again with deprivation measured properly inside each nation rather than England alone. We are closing it. What does predict local failure rates is the density of test centres, which is a statement about testing, not about cars.

All external-factor correlations (machine-readable)
Factorrn areasLow-Q fail %High-Q fail %Gap ppLow-Q factorHigh-Q factor
MOT centre density (per 10k vehicles)0.65310834.946.2+11.458.4
Urban share (0–1)-0.54510845.635.9-9.70.41
Distance to coast (km)-0.24110846.041.6-4.4680.2
Road-salt proxy (g/m²-yr)0.22910840.043.9+3.9221.5634.9
Frost days (days/year)0.22710842.043.9+1.811.536
Terrain gradient (% grade)0.1536542.144.4+2.30.53.7
Income deprivation (score)-0.1079441.940.8-1.10.10.2

Deprivation uses England IMD 2019 income score only (Scotland SIMD is a different scale). Salt proxy is a simplified NWSRG-style dry-salt sum from air Tmin; coastalness is distance from the area centroid to the nearest coastline.

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 31%–51% failing.

Citroen Dispatch survival: which cars are still on the road

By age 19 is well below the reference at 13.2%, against 100.0% at the ages 4–6 reference level.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Citroen Dispatch survival: which cars are still on the road — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: van age, years · survival vs ages 4–6 · scale 0–105%.

Survival vs fail rate by age
AgeTestsSurvival vs ages 4–6Fail %
326,294100%26.85%
425,469100%30.88%
525,268100%33.48%
623,53795.1%36.95%
720,97184.7%41.32%
818,84476.1%47.25%
917,84272.1%49.96%
1015,50062.6%49.45%
1114,98660.5%51.02%
1214,95860.4%50.67%
1314,41658.2%49.76%
1413,30853.8%51%
1511,66547.1%50.95%
169,66139%51.73%
177,21029.1%51.15%
184,79519.4%51.57%
193,26413.2%52.18%

By age 19, only about 13% as many cars of this family present for MOT as at ages 4–6 (reference n≈24,758); survivors still fail at 52.2% vs 30.9% at age 4. Older cars that still appear are a selected subset — weaker ones have already left.

How many miles does a Citroen Dispatch last?

100,000+ miles is highest at 42.8%; 200,000+ miles is lowest at 5.9% — the gap is 36.9 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

OdometerTests ≥ thresholdShare of sample
100,000+ miles111,37242.8%
150,000+ miles43,46916.7%
200,000+ miles15,3485.9%

Of 260,230 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 42.8% had reached 100k miles, 16.7% had reached 150k miles, 5.9% had reached 200k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.

How many years is a Citroen Dispatch likely to last?

Bought at age 5 is highest at 8.2 years; Bought at age 15 is lowest at 2.6 years — the gap is 5.6 years.

bigger number = longer remaining lifeyears on the observed survival curve

Age nowTypical mileage (p50)Expected years left
5—8.2
8—7.3
10—6.6
12—4.8
15—at least 2.6

estimateEstimate only — not a warranty: a typical 10-year-old example of this family has about 6.6 expected years of further MOT-present life on the 2024 survival curve. Derived from how many cars of each age still appear for test, not from a longitudinal panel.

Citroen Dispatch faults that come together

Road Wheels + Seatbelts & SRS stand out at 6.20×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
Road WheelsSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems306.2× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksRoad Wheels414.4× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSteering5284.15×
Road WheelsSteering364.14× (rough estimate)
BrakesRoad Wheels1254.07× (rough estimate)
Road WheelsTyres823.92× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems723.82× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSuspension2,0673.78×
Identification of the vehicleNoise, emissions and leaks1373.78× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems5023.69×
Identification of the vehicleSteering1203.55× (rough estimate)
SteeringSuspension3,4393.51×
BrakesSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems1,5553.46×
Speedometer and speed limiterSuspension223.35× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSteering8163.34×
Road WheelsSuspension1223.27× (rough estimate)
BrakesIdentification of the vehicle3833.2× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSpeedometer and speed limiter323.17× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleTyres2573.16× (rough estimate)
BrakesSteering2,5163.12×
BrakesNoise, emissions and leaks2,6733.09×
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment7732.88×
Identification of the vehicleSuspension4172.87× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentRoad Wheels1962.85× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleVisibility4872.83× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSuspension2,8972.76×
BrakesSuspension9,4602.73×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems2,6582.64×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSpeedometer and speed limiter322.64× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsTyres8002.62×
BrakesTyres5,0082.58×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentNoise, emissions and leaks4,9872.57×
Noise, emissions and leaksTyres1,5052.56×
BrakesLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment15,6472.45×
Body, chassis, structureSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems2,0442.44×
Body, chassis, structureRoad Wheels1402.44× (rough estimate)
SteeringTyres1,3352.43×
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks3,8982.42×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSteering4,3682.41×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres10,3522.38×
Body, chassis, structureSteering3,5792.38×
Body, chassis, structureIdentification of the vehicle5202.33×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension17,7852.29×
Body, chassis, structureSuspension14,5742.25×
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsVisibility1,4412.23×
SuspensionTyres5,2312.22×
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility2,7262.19×
Road WheelsVisibility962.18× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureBrakes11,4232.15×
TyresVisibility5,9492.13×
BrakesVisibility8,6792.12×
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment24,8202.08×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility19,1142.08×
SteeringVisibility2,3732.05×
Body, chassis, structureTyres6,8461.89×
SuspensionVisibility9,1191.83×
Body, chassis, structureVisibility13,1791.72×
Speedometer and speed limiterVisibility19too few (rough estimate)
BrakesSpeedometer and speed limiter18too few (rough estimate)
BrakesSeat belt installation check16too few (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belt installation check16too few (rough estimate)
Seat belt installation checkSuspension13too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSeat belt installation check13too few (rough estimate)
Buses and coaches supplementary testsLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment10too few (rough estimate)
Speedometer and speed limiterTyres9too few (rough estimate)
Seat belt installation checkTyres8too few (rough estimate)
Buses and coaches supplementary testsSuspension8too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleRoad Wheels7too few (rough estimate)
Speedometer and speed limiterSteering7too few (rough estimate)
Buses and coaches supplementary testsVisibility7too few (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSpeedometer and speed limiter6too few (rough estimate)
BrakesBuses and coaches supplementary tests6too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureBuses and coaches supplementary tests6too few (rough estimate)
Seat belt installation checkVisibility6too few (rough estimate)
Seat belt installation checkSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems5too few (rough estimate)
Seat belt installation checkSteering5too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSpeedometer and speed limiter5too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems» and «Steering» appear together 4.15× more often than chance (528 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Is low mileage better for a Citroen Dispatch?

Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 29.3%, against 44.9% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

BandFail %Tests
<5k miles/year29.3%10,892
8–12k miles/year44.94%57,083
Gap (low − normal)-15.65 pp—
By fuel and age

Diesel

AgeLow-use fail %nNormal fail %nGap pp
521.581,41830.646,577-9.06 pp
622.381,36334.396,618-12.01 pp
723.031,20741.166,208-18.12 pp
827.351,11947.295,887-19.94 pp
930.981,07850.815,710-19.82 pp
1032.2895150.865,151-18.58 pp
1135.9386052.285,094-16.35 pp
1237.888150.855,207-13.06 pp
1333.8393450.665,182-16.82 pp
1437.481,01452.214,919-14.73 pp

At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 29.3% vs 44.9% for 8–12k miles/year — 15.7 pp lower (n_low=10,892, n_normal=57,083). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates. Diesel alone: 29.3% low-use vs 44.9% normal (-15.6 pp).

Best year for a Citroen Dispatch, and the years to avoid

Build year 2015 is highest at 111.8; Build year 2017 is lowest at 78.5 — the gap is 33.3 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

build year vs the same model at the same age · 100 = as expected

Citroen Dispatch build year vs the same model at the same age · 100 = as expected — 2024 UK MOT data
Citroen Dispatch by build year, tests 2019–2024. Below 100 is better than the model's own age norm.
Every build year with its confidence interval
Build yearvs own age norm95% CIRaw fail %TestsVerdict
202097.993.3–102.627.36%6,313no different
201997.194.1–100.228.51%13,439no different
201889.987.4–92.327.99%18,206better
201778.576.6–80.425.67%25,112better
2016109.7107.4–111.939.17%22,880worse
2015111.8109.7–113.844.28%25,835worse
2014105102.9–107.144.82%21,100worse
2013101.899.5–104.146.51%16,219no different
2012101.498.8–10448.77%12,042no different
2011103.9101.5–106.251.64%14,033worse
201010097.8–102.250.47%15,646no different
2009100.397.8–102.850.8%12,094no different
200897.595.3–99.649.81%15,401better
200798.696.4–100.950.51%14,797no different
200699.296.5–101.951%10,396no different
2005102.499.4–105.453.18%8,396no different
200498.795.4–10251.28%6,671no different
200397.893.6–10251.19%4,118no different
2002100.394.8–105.952.72%2,405no different
200193.585.6–101.449.77%1,087no different
2000100.889.2–112.553.93%534no different

The best build year here is 2017 and the weakest is 2015. Comparing build years sounds simple and is not: within a single year of testing, a car's build year and its age are the same number, so a naive comparison of years is a comparison of ages wearing a disguise. Each year below is measured against the same model at the same age in other cohorts, across six years of testing — 7 of 21 years come out distinguishable from their own model's age norm.

Two limits worth knowing before you act on this. Age, test year and build year are locked together by arithmetic, so the test-year effect is taken from the observed national failure level of each year rather than estimated — it is an adjustment, not a solution.

Citroen Dispatch MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £126.06 to £239.51, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£126–240
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment40.5 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£56.70
Suspension19.5 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£35.10
Brakes17.2 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£25.80
Tyres9.4 (nat. 8.7)Tyre (single mid-range 16" fitted)£90£8.46

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £126 to £240, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Citroen Dispatch running costs for a fleet

Vehicles failing at age 10 stand out at 48.0%, against 29.0% at age 5, tested in the same year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fails per 100 at age 5
29
vehicles needing work
At age 10
48
other cars of this model tested at age 10 in 2024
Repairs per 100
£12,606
plus £5,485 in test fees
Off the road
1d
median; 36.85% cleared same day
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
AgeFailsMedian odometerTestsGap vs age 5
329.68%43,5043,150+1.0 pp
429.91%56,3413,099+1.2 pp
528.7%65,4084,227+0.0 pp
628.47%71,9814,376-0.2 pp
730.48%83,9714,436+1.8 pp
844.7%90,8243,631+16.0 pp
950%100,2384,120+21.3 pp
1047.87%105,4053,286+19.2 pp
1150.14%111,5082,535+21.4 pp
1249.61%120,5271,812+20.9 pp
1350.43%130,1041,977+21.7 pp
1449.01%135,1992,063+20.3 pp
1549.87%132,2261,564+21.2 pp
1649.33%140,1091,861+20.6 pp
1749.73%142,7511,647+21.0 pp
1850.61%127,871980+21.9 pp
1950.54%120,399744+21.8 pp

The number a fleet manager needs is not the failure rate, it is the year the car starts costing more. Between cars aged 7 and cars aged 8, both tested in 2024, the failure rate of this model is 14.22 percentage points higher — the steepest one-year step in this cross-section of different cars, and a natural planning point for replacement.

Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.

Citroen Dispatch rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility stands out at 2.54×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

How it rusts
2.54×
1.95% of tests record a corrosion defect vs 0.77% typical — age-standardised
Salt Belt exposure
61st
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 108 postcode areas

This Citroen Dispatch fails on corrosion far more often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are about typical for the models we publish.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Citroen Dispatch advisory become a failure?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment are highest at 35.3%; Road wheels are lowest at 0.6% — the gap is 34.7 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

Citroen Dispatch chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now — 2024 UK MOT data
Citroen Dispatch, advisory → failure conversion by component group, chained tests 2019–2024. Chart labels and rates: Lamps & electrical 35.3% · Body & chassis 32.2% · Suspension 27.1% · Brakes 14.7% · Steering 12.5% · Tyres 10.1% · Seat belts & restraints 7.7% · Noise, emissions, leaks 5.4%.
Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment35.3%12.1 months8,0519,254
Body, chassis, structure32.2%12.1 months6,60112,163
Suspension27.1%12.1 months6,54922,036
Brakes14.7%12.1 months7,94947,014
Steering12.5%12.1 months7,5445,572
Tyres10.1%12.1 months8,06047,115
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems7.7%12.1 months7,8892,896
Noise, emissions and leaks5.4%12.1 months8,10425,708
Identification of the vehicle4.7%12.1 months9,9684,616
Road wheels0.6%11.4 months4,482830

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 35 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.1 months and roughly 8,051 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Citroen Dispatch?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 9-11 are highest at 34.0%; Brakes after a passed at age <3 are lowest at 5.0% — the gap is 29.0 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
<3passedVisibility 13.2% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 10.5% · Brakes 5.0%8,887
<3advisoryVisibility 15.6% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 13.3% · Brakes 7.8%3,148
<3failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 17.7% · Visibility 16.2% · Brakes 7.2%3,871
3-5passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 13.8% · Visibility 9.2% · Body, chassis, structure 8.5%27,065
3-5advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 18.0% · Visibility 11.9% · Body, chassis, structure 10.9%13,189
3-5failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 24.3% · Body, chassis, structure 15.2% · Visibility 14.0%19,898
6-8passedBody, chassis, structure 20.0% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 19.8% · Visibility 10.2%14,900
6-8advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 25.0% · Body, chassis, structure 24.3% · Visibility 13.7%10,615
6-8failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 33.1% · Body, chassis, structure 30.2% · Visibility 17.5%21,041
9-11passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 21.6% · Body, chassis, structure 21.2% · Suspension 13.3%8,995
9-11advisoryBody, chassis, structure 27.4% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 26.7% · Suspension 17.8%8,812
9-11failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 34.0% · Body, chassis, structure 30.0% · Suspension 20.8%17,915
12-14passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 19.7% · Body, chassis, structure 19.5% · Suspension 17.5%6,718
12-14advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 26.3% · Body, chassis, structure 25.9% · Suspension 22.7%8,790
12-14failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 33.2% · Body, chassis, structure 29.3% · Suspension 27.3%15,463
15-19passedBody, chassis, structure 19.2% · Suspension 19.0% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 17.3%3,889
15-19advisoryBody, chassis, structure 27.6% · Suspension 25.9% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 23.7%6,050
15-19failureSuspension 31.8% · Body, chassis, structure 31.2% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 31.0%10,221
20+passedBody, chassis, structure 17.4% · Suspension 14.1% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 13.4%426 (rough estimate)
20+advisoryBody, chassis, structure 28.6% · Suspension 23.1% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 21.6%762
20+failureBody, chassis, structure 27.6% · Suspension 26.9% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 25.9%983

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Citroen Dispatch ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 59.1%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 4.1% — the gap is 55.0 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
36.85%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
0.383
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
29.55%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
10.696%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 80,474 failures followed through to their re-test, 36.85% were repaired and passed the same day and 59.06% within ten days; the median gap is 1 day. 264,227 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.383 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 7,592 miles a year across 53,707 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 29.55% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 30.89% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 10.696% of 53,935 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 61,007 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Citroen Dispatch safety recalls and how to check yours

DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 70.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

recall campaigns launched per year

Citroen Dispatch recall campaigns launched per year — 2024 UK MOT data
Campaigns launched per year for the Citroen Dispatch. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls. Chart values: 2012: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2016: 0 · 2017: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2023: 0 · 2024: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2026: 2.
Most recent safety recall campaigns for the Citroen Dispatch
ReferenceLaunchedVehiclesConcern
R/2026/11013/03/2026403Water Pump Pulley
R/2026/02121/01/2026471Citroen Cross carline Fuel injection common rail.
R/2026/00919/12/20250Citroen Spacetourer (K0) Berlingo (K9) IVI software via OTA update.
R/2025/50012/11/20251,838Citroen Dispatch/Spacetourer Low In-use Performance ratio ECM s/w.
R/2025/41429/09/20251Citroën Spacetourer/Dispatch(K0) Rear Brake Discs
All 70 campaigns
ReferenceLaunchedBuild datesVehiclesConcern
R/2026/11013/03/202615/10/2025 – 28/02/2026403Water Pump Pulley
R/2026/02121/01/202628/07/2025 – 09/10/2025471Citroen Cross carline Fuel injection common rail.
R/2026/00919/12/202520/11/2023 – 05/07/20250Citroen Spacetourer (K0) Berlingo (K9) IVI software via OTA update.
R/2025/50012/11/202511/07/2022 – 29/01/20241,838Citroen Dispatch/Spacetourer Low In-use Performance ratio ECM s/w.
R/2025/41429/09/202524/01/2024 – 24/01/20241Citroën Spacetourer/Dispatch(K0) Rear Brake Discs
R/2025/34618/08/202523/09/2020 – 30/06/20223,978Emission recall – On Board Diagnostics
R/2025/31101/08/202523/09/2020 – 30/06/202210,114Citroen Dispatch (K0) Lower Control Arm Bushing
R/2025/12224/03/202514/12/2022 – 02/03/202356Traction Battery software
R/2024/45704/11/202428/10/2024 – 08/10/2024859Citroen Spacetourer Dispatch K0 Seat Fixation
R/2024/42023/10/202408/03/2024 – 04/10/20242,830Citroen Dispatch (K0) Display Screws missing.
R/2024/31505/08/202418/10/2023 – 28/06/2024779Citroen Dispatch (K0) Rear Springs
R/2024/21707/05/202410/02/2023 – 31/01/20246Citroen Dispatch -K0 – Ground Connections
R/2022/33701/12/202229/01/2020 – 21/01/20221,507Some vehicles may have been equipped with an incorrectly positioned fuel pipe.
R/2022/24208/08/202220/01/2022 – 28/01/202227THE EFFICIENCY OF THE HANDBRAKE AND SERVICE BRAKE MAY BE COMPROMISED.
R/2022/20213/07/202228/03/2022 – 29/04/202211THE HIGH VOLTAGE HARNESS FITTED MIGHT NOT BE TO CORRECT SPECIFICATION
R/2022/12610/05/202216/11/2021 – 16/12/2021359HEADRESTS ON THE FRONT MODULAR SEAT DO NOT CONFORM TO THE DESIGN SPECIFICATION
R/2022/02831/01/202220/10/2015 – 13/10/20161ELECTRICAL HARNESS COULD MOVE FROM ORIGINAL POSITION AND WEAKEN THE HARNESS
R/2021/00605/01/202124/09/2020 – 11/11/20207VEHICLES AFFECTED MAY HAVE A SINGLE WHEEL BOLT ON BOTH RIGHT HAND SIDE WHEELS WHICH MAY NO
R/2021/00705/01/202124/09/2020 – 11/11/202012VEHICLES AFFECTED MAY HAVE A SINGLE WHEEL BOLT ON BOTH LEFT HAND SIDE WHEELS WHICH MAY NOT
R/2019/43230/03/202001/05/2016 – 09/09/201921,087FUEL TUBES UNDER BODY MAY BECOME DAMAGED OVER TIME
R/2020/06930/03/202008/05/2019 – 30/10/201984POSSIBLE NON CONFORMITY OF SEALS IN FRONT WHEEL ARCHES COULD LEAD TO WATER INGRESS INTO CE
R/2020/07730/03/202013/08/2019 – 24/09/20194THE TIGHTENING OF THE REAR SUSPENSION FIXINGS MAY NOT BE TO SPECIFICATION
R/2019/43430/03/202022/03/2019 – 15/04/201984NON-CONFORMITY OF THE REAR BRAKE CALLIPERS
R/2019/43630/03/202017/12/2018 – 26/04/201985ONE OR MORE FIXATIONS OF THE SEATBELTS AND ONE GROUND CABLE MAY NOT BE TIGHTENED CORRECTLY
R/2019/43730/03/202017/12/2018 – 26/04/20193,111ONE OR MORE FIXATIONS OF THE SEATBELTS LOWER BOLTS MAY NOT BE TIGHTENED CORRECTLY
R/2019/43005/02/202015/10/2019 – 31/10/201915CERTAIN SEALS IN THE FRONT WHEEL ARCHES MAY NOT BE CORRECT TO SPECIFICATION
R/2019/29602/09/201925/02/2014 – 29/03/2016792ON THE AFFECTED VEHICLES IT IS POSSIBLE THAT A CRACK COULD DEVELOP OVER TIME ON THE COUNTE
R/2019/25715/08/201916/04/2015 – 23/04/201916,122IF THE FRONT CENTRE PASSENGER SEATING POSITION IS OCCUPIED THE FRONT OUTER PASSENGER SEAT
R/2019/14509/05/201916/04/2015 – 23/04/201911,023FRONT SUSPENSION MAY NOT BE TO CORRECT SPECIFICATION
R/2019/14509/05/201921/09/2015 – 23/11/201811,023FRONT SUSPENSION MAY NOT BE TO CORRECT SPECIFICATION
R/2019/03301/02/201901/07/2016 – 11/09/201847THE FIXING BOLT OF THE FRONT SUSPENSION WISHBONE MAY NOT BE CORRECT TO SPECIFICATION
R/2019/03101/02/201906/10/2016 – 19/10/2018313REAR SUSPENSION WISHBONE MOUNTING BOLTS NAY NOT BE CORRECT TO SPECIFICATION
R/2019/03501/02/201925/10/2016 – 21/09/201810THE STEERING RACK ASSEMBLY MAY NOT BE CORRECT TO SPECIFICATION
R/2019/02701/02/201901/01/2015 – 30/11/20182,633EXCESSIVE LOADING OF THE FRONT SUSPENSION COULD RESULT IN THE LOOSENING OF THE FRONT WISHB
R/2019/02901/02/201908/09/2015 – 27/03/20182,310UNDER CERTAIN DRIVING CONDITIONS THE AIR CONDITIONING COMPRESSOR PULLEY COULD BREAK
R/2018/19525/07/201813/11/2015 – 05/10/2017103Tow ball support bracket durability inadequate
R/2018/19324/07/201817/02/2016 – 26/02/2018660COOLING SYSTEM STRATEGY COULD OVERHEAT THE ENGINE.
R/2018/18719/07/201830/04/2018 – 02/06/201837Engine oil gallery sealing plug incorrectly tightened
R/2018/00203/01/201801/10/2017 – 30/11/2017198ENGINE COMPONENT MAY NOT BE TO SPECIFICATION
R/2017/26214/09/201713/01/2016 – 30/06/201612STARTER MOTOR SUPPLY WIRING HARNESS MAY BECOME DAMAGED
R/2017/13924/04/201715/06/2016 – 11/10/20163,607STARTER MOTOR MAY NOT OPERATE CORRECTLY
R/2017/06022/02/201715/10/2015 – 27/10/20161,653UNEXPECTED AIRBAG DEPLOYMENT
R/2017/05822/02/201713/04/2016 – 29/06/20162BRAKE SERVO MAY BE INSECURE
R/2017/05722/02/201702/02/2016 – 09/07/201654FUEL MAY LEAK
R/2017/06722/02/20171FRONT SHOCK ABSORBER MAY FAIL
R/2017/06522/02/201710/05/2016 – 19/08/20168MALFUNCTIONS IN ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS
R/2017/07022/02/201715/10/2015 – 27/10/2016141UNEXPECTED AIRBAG DEPLOYMENT
R/2017/07122/02/201713/06/2016 – 08/09/20162STEERING BOLTS MAY NOT BE TIGHTENED CORRECTLY
R/2015/24308/12/201501/09/2012 – 02/01/20149,483FUEL MAY LEAK
R/2014/16402/12/201403/10/2011 – 09/04/20144,775FUEL MAY LEAK
R/2014/00128/01/201401/07/2013 – 20/09/2013620WIPER MOTOR MAY FAIL
R/2014/00424/01/201429/08/2013 – 12/09/201349BRAKING EFFICIENCY MAY BE AFFECTED
R/2013/09902/09/201315/06/2011 – 14/11/201137LOSS OF STEERING
R/2012/04228/03/201219/01/2012 – 20/01/201217TYRE MAY DEFLATE
R/2011/11431/08/201105/05/2011 – 05/05/20112FIRE MAY OCCUR
R/2011/08211/07/201101/02/2010 – 07/02/20111,357POWER STEERING ASSISTANCE MAY FAIL
R/2011/01822/02/201108/07/2010 – 13/10/201033FUEL MAY LEAK
R/2010/22317/12/201021/12/2006 – 27/03/200920,089BRAKING ASSISTANCE MAY NOT PERFORM CORRECTLY
R/2010/15505/10/201004/07/2007 – 27/03/200812,950LIGHTS MAY FAIL WITHOUT WARNING
R/2010/11109/08/201024/02/2010 – 27/05/2010630BRAKING EFFICIENCY MAY BE COMPROMISED
R/2010/03016/03/20102,258BRAKING PERFORMANCE MAY BE AFFECTED
R/2010/01915/02/201001/01/2007 – 09/07/20081,135FUEL MAY LEAK
R/2009/11319/10/200921/12/2006 – 27/03/200837,086LIGHTS MAY SWITCH OFF UNEXPECTEDLY
R/2008/19705/01/200913/05/2008 – 25/03/2008178ACCELERATOR PEDAL MAY FAIL TO RETURN TO IDLE WHEN RELEASED
R/2007/16312/11/200726/07/2006 – 22/03/2007689POSSIBLE LOSS OF POWER STEERING
R/2006/08006/05/200604/01/2006 – 06/01/200639SEATBELT MAY NOT OPERATE AS DESIGNED
R/2003/11526/07/200324/03/2003 – 04/04/2003266POSSIBLE FAILURE OF THE BOTTOM ENGINE MOUNTING TIE BAR
R/2002/01020/02/200201/09/2000 – 31/05/200180BRAKE VACUUM ELECTROVALVES CONCERN.
R/2000/12220/11/200001/01/1999 – 31/12/20002,812POTENTIAL LOSS OF BRAKE VACUUM ASSISTANCE
R/1998/09225/11/199801/03/1998 – 30/07/1998689POSSIBLE PREMATURE WEAR OF HANDBRAKE RATCHET PAWL

DVSA lists 70 safety recall campaigns for the Citroen Dispatch, covering roughly 193,754 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.

Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.

Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.

Citroen Dispatch MOT: quick answers

Citroen Dispatch MOT Risk Index stands out at 152.3, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Citroen Dispatch first-time MOT pass rate?
59.15% of first attempts passed in 2024 (47,069 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 40.85% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 47,069 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 152.3 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Citroen Dispatch with other cars

Ford Transit Custom is highest at 156.9; Citroen Berlingo is lowest at 149.2 — the gap is 7.7 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Citroen MOT statisticsCitroen Berlingo MOT statsCitroen C4 MOT stats

Similar risk

Vauxhall Vivaro (index 151.9)Citroen Berlingo (index 149.2)Ford Transit Custom (index 156.9)

Same size class

how Kia Venga compareshow Fiat Doblo compareshow Seat Ateca compares

By build year

Citroen Dispatch 2000Citroen Dispatch 2001Citroen Dispatch 2002Citroen Dispatch 2003Citroen Dispatch 2004Citroen Dispatch 2005Citroen Dispatch 2006Citroen Dispatch 2007Citroen Dispatch 2008Citroen Dispatch 2009Citroen Dispatch 2010Citroen Dispatch 2011Citroen Dispatch 2012Citroen Dispatch 2013Citroen Dispatch 2014Citroen Dispatch 2015Citroen Dispatch 2016Citroen Dispatch 2017Citroen Dispatch 2018Citroen Dispatch 2019Citroen Dispatch 2020

By area

Citroen Dispatch MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Citroen Dispatch body, chassis and structure failuresCitroen Dispatch brakes failuresCitroen Dispatch vehicle identification failuresCitroen Dispatch lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresCitroen Dispatch noise, emissions and leaks failuresCitroen Dispatch road wheels failuresCitroen Dispatch seat belts and airbags failuresCitroen Dispatch steering failuresCitroen Dispatch suspension failuresCitroen Dispatch tyres failuresCitroen Dispatch visibility failures


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:citroen-dispatch:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Citroen Dispatch MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/citroen-dispatch/ · Published 2026-07-30.