MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Citroen C4 Picasso — MOT statistics 2024

The Citroen C4 Picasso failed 26.14% of 6,779 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 118.7 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 19% more often than expected for its age.

MOT risk index 118.7, 95% CI 114.0–123.5 (100 = national average) 100 118.7 0 200
Index
118.7
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
26.14%
n = 6,779
Dangerous /100
8
national ≈11
Diesel − petrol
+3.6 pp
fail-rate gap
Rank
640 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Vauxhall Corsa (index 118.7) — the two published results are 0.0 index points apart.

Citroen C4 Picasso common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment stand out at 10.6 per 100 tests, against 5.7 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Citroen C4 Picasso common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone, and 1 of these is already inside an interval that includes 1.00×.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Lamps & electrical10.63,7195.71.85×1.78–1.90
Tyres7.32,5637.31.00×0.96–1.04 · not distinguishable
Suspension6.22,1664.71.32×1.26–1.37
Brakes6.12,1325.01.21×1.15–1.25
Visibility3.91,3595.60.70×0.66–0.73
Body & structure2.81,0031.32.15×2.06–2.33
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 35,209 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Rear registration plate lamp or light source…A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources3.412.831.21×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mma brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm2.442.151.13×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Tyre seriously damagedA tyre seriously damaged2.742.541.08×Check tyre tread depth across the full width
Tyre cords visible or damagedA tyre cords visible or damaged1.671.631.02×Check tyre tread depth across the full width
Transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot…A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc1.511.560.97×Ask the seller about: A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or
Suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer…A suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc1.021.780.57×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Windscreen or window damaged or seriously…Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view1.342.360.57×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn3.684.870.76×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements1.332.570.52×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the…Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements2.243.590.62×Check tyre tread depth across the full width

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Citroen C4 Picasso MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Tyres are highest at 46.8 per 100 tests; Emissions & leaks are lowest at 1.2 per 100 tests — the gap is 45.6 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Citroen C4 Picasso MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Tyres46.8
Brakes36.8
Suspension14.3
Non-component advisories9.4
Emissions & leaks1.2
Body & structure1.2

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

Tyres, brakes and suspension: Citroen C4 Picasso against cars of the same age

AgePartCitroen C4 PicassoSame age, petrol and dieselDifference
3 yearsTyres3.674.17-0.50
3 yearsBrakes1.971.770.20
3 yearsSuspension1.760.631.13
4 yearsTyres4.514.54-0.03
4 yearsBrakes2.992.430.56
4 yearsSuspension2.911.211.70
5 yearsTyres5.455.060.39
5 yearsBrakes3.953.090.86
5 yearsSuspension3.632.191.44
6 yearsTyres5.885.540.34
6 yearsBrakes4.343.810.53
6 yearsSuspension4.153.720.43
7 yearsTyres5.885.95-0.07
7 yearsBrakes4.164.55-0.39
7 yearsSuspension6.675.680.99
8 yearsTyres5.736.31-0.58
8 yearsBrakes5.785.380.40
8 yearsSuspension8.587.780.80

Failing items per 100 initial tests, 2019-2024. The comparison group is every petrol or diesel car tested at the same age, so weight and drivetrain show up rather than fleet age.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed29.5%1,426
It passed19.2%22,454

A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 10.3 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is visibility — 34.2% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 34,496 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only108.7fails more often than expected
Age and annual mileage113.7fails more often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year6.1%a normal spread of use

Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 5.0 points — this fleet is driven less than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view flatters it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Citroen C4 Picasso compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

AgeCitroen C4 PicassoSame class, same ageDifferenceTests
3 years12.25%11.3%+0.95 pp6,538
4 years14.97%14.24%+0.73 pp5,918
5 years18.29%17.41%+0.88 pp6,123
6 years21.72%20.75%+0.97 pp6,239
7 years24.15%24.32%-0.17 pp5,292
8 years30.29%28.15%+2.14 pp2,354
9 years33.73%32.03%+1.7 pp759
10 years39.53%35.6%+3.93 pp511
11 years46.01%38.65%+7.36 pp326
12 years47.53%41.25%+6.28 pp263
13 years46.75%43.29%+3.46 pp231
14 years49.44%45.04%+4.4 pp178

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Citroen C4 Picasso perform as it gets older?

The C4 Picasso at age 11 stands out at 41.7%, against 33.2% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the Citroen C4 Picasso perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–45%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars; from about age 6 it stays above the national age curve.

Data table
AgeCitroen C4 PicassoAll vehiclesGap
621.6%17.5%+4.1 pp
722.9%20.2%+2.7 pp
828.9%23.3%+5.6 pp
928.1%26.5%+1.6 pp
1036.5%30.1%+6.4 pp
1141.7%33.2%+8.6 pp

Is a Citroen C4 Picasso ULEZ compliant?

The share of classifiable 2024 Citroen C4 Picasso MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 89.3%.

Based on 6,774 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.

higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class

Age-band estimate from classifiable initial MOT tests
Vehicle age at testLikely ULEZ-compliant shareTests
Under 3 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
3–5 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 53
6–7 years100.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 4,173
8 years100.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 1,656
9 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 281
10–14 years4.1%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 513
15–17 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 96
18 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 2
19 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
20+ yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0

How dangerous are Citroen C4 Picasso MOT failures?

Major defects are well below the reference at 22.7 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Citroen C4 Picasso MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor8.3414.220.59×
Major22.7052.750.43×
Dangerous8.2611.150.74×

Chart values: Minor 8.3 · Major 22.7 · Dangerous 8.3.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Citroen C4 Picasso MOT matter?

Nov is highest at 23.4%; Mar is lowest at 18.0% — the gap is 5.4 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Citroen C4 Picasso MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 16%–33%.

bars: Citroen C4 Picasso · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthCitroen C4 PicassoAll vehiclesGap
Jan20.71%31.12%-10.4 pp
Feb19.65%29.99%-10.3 pp
Mar17.97%28.26%-10.3 pp
Apr18.38%29.78%-11.4 pp
May20.19%28.79%-8.6 pp
Jun19.23%28.15%-8.9 pp
Jul21.01%29.33%-8.3 pp
Aug21.68%29.2%-7.5 pp
Sep20.76%28.19%-7.4 pp
Oct21.5%30.34%-8.8 pp
Nov23.38%30.58%-7.2 pp
Dec22.11%29.33%-7.2 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 5.4 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Citroen C4 Picasso average mileage by age

At age 8, the middle half of C4 Picassos runs from 41,377 miles to 70,414 miles, against 55,075 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Bars: Citroen C4 Picasso · dashed: all class-4 cars — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · odometer scale 0–99k mi.

Does high mileage mean more Citroen C4 Picasso MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 6–9, 16.9% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 34.3% of those with 100,000–140,000 miles.Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.

Does high mileage mean more Citroen C4 Picasso MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
Citroen C4 Picasso: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
6–9<40k miles16.9%15.3–18.7%1,878
6–940-70k miles25%23.5–26.6%3,038
6–970-100k miles35.5%32.6–38.6%982
6–9100-140k miles34.3%27.6–41.7%172 (rough estimate)
10–1440-70k miles40.3%32.5–48.6%139 (rough estimate)
10–1470-100k miles45%38.7–51.5%229 (rough estimate)
10–14100-140k miles44.3%34.4–54.7%88 (rough estimate)

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
630,81742,86154,9611,160
736,35949,10763,8243,013
841,37755,07570,4141,656
953,89767,91384,453281
1059,54576,96594,073238
1160,95079,60193,748127

A typical 8-year-old C4 Picasso has ~55,075 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Citroen C4 Picasso fails its MOT most

Truro area is highest at 34.4%; London E area is lowest at 9.1% — the gap is 25.3 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Citroen C4 Picasso line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75) — 2024 UK MOT data
Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Truro (TR)34.41%+13.8 pp
Redhill (RH)33.42%+12.8 pp
Durham (DH)31.58%+11.0 pp
Huddersfield (HD)30.77%+10.2 pp
Darlington (DL)29.95%+9.4 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
London E (E)9.09%-11.5 pp
Nottingham (NG)9.22%-11.4 pp
Romford (RM)10.56%-10.0 pp
Oldham (OL)10.74%-9.8 pp
Southend-on-Sea (SS)11.65%-8.9 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 13%–29% failing.

Citroen C4 Picasso survival: which cars are still on the road

By age 16 is well below the reference at 1.2%, against 100.0% at the ages 4–6 reference level.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Citroen C4 Picasso survival: which cars are still on the road — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · survival vs ages 4–6 · scale 0–105%.

Survival vs fail rate by age
AgeTestsSurvival vs ages 4–6Fail %
36,538100%12.25%
45,91897.1%14.97%
56,123100%18.29%
66,239100%21.72%
75,29286.8%24.15%
82,35438.6%30.29%
975912.5%33.73%
105118.4%39.53%
113265.4%46.01%
122634.3%47.53%
132313.8%46.75%
141782.9%49.44%
151352.2%51.11%
16731.2%49.32%

By age 10, only about 8% as many cars of this family present for MOT as at ages 4–6 (reference n≈6,093); survivors still fail at 39.5% vs 15.0% at age 4. Older cars that still appear are a selected subset — weaker ones have already left.

How many miles does a Citroen C4 Picasso last?

100,000+ miles stands out at 3.2%.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

OdometerTests ≥ thresholdShare of sample
100,000+ miles1,0953.17%

Of 34,509 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 3.2% had reached 100k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.

How many years is a Citroen C4 Picasso likely to last?

Bought at age 5 is highest at 3.0 years; Bought at age 10 is lowest at 0.5 years — the gap is 2.5 years.

bigger number = longer remaining lifeyears on the observed survival curve

Age nowTypical mileage (p50)Expected years left
5—3
8—at least 1
10—at least 0.5

estimateEstimate only — not a warranty: a typical 10-year-old example of this family has at least 0.5 expected years of further MOT-present life. The curve is observed only until age 10, so the true figure is likely higher.

Citroen C4 Picasso faults that come together

Body & structure + Steering stand out at 6.31×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
Body, chassis, structureSteering426.31× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks416.02× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentRoad Wheels285.29× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility465.13× (rough estimate)
SteeringSuspension625.03× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems554.97× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentNoise, emissions and leaks954.59× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSteering924.54× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSuspension554.36× (rough estimate)
BrakesNoise, emissions and leaks454.27× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSuspension1744.07× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility3603.89× (rough estimate)
BrakesSteering393.78× (rough estimate)
BrakesTyres2613.52× (rough estimate)
BrakesSuspension2313.49× (rough estimate)
SteeringVisibility303.42× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension4433.41× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureVisibility1023.35× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureBrakes1183.3× (rough estimate)
BrakesVisibility1543.27× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSuspension223.27× (rough estimate)
BrakesLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment3393.12× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment2143.05× (rough estimate)
SuspensionVisibility1723.05× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres4032.76× (rough estimate)
SuspensionTyres2452.76× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsTyres202.65× (rough estimate)
TyresVisibility1672.64× (rough estimate)
SteeringTyres352.53× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksTyres342.4× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureTyres1142.38× (rough estimate)
BrakesSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems19too few (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsVisibility16too few (rough estimate)
BrakesRoad Wheels14too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSuspension14too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsTyres13too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment12too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems12too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleTyres9too few (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSteering8too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems7too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSteering7too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureRoad Wheels6too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsVisibility6too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksRoad Wheels5too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleVisibility5too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSuspension5too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Body, chassis, structure» and «Steering» appear together 6.31× more often than chance (42 co-occurrences in the same test; 66 pairs compared).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Is low mileage better for a Citroen C4 Picasso?

Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 14.2%, against 25.3% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

BandFail %Tests
<5k miles/year14.2%4,162
8–12k miles/year25.3%4,983
Gap (low − normal)-11.1 pp—
By fuel and age

Diesel

AgeLow-use fail %nNormal fail %nGap pp
512.41,09720.781,367-8.38 pp
615.091,06026.141,492-11.05 pp
717.5788229.411,384-11.83 pp
820.3539840.69666-20.34 pp
922.5211142.21263-19.68 pp
1027.918646.89177-18.99 pp
1136.215846.6103-10.4 pp
1232.433752.4482-20.01 pp
1334.293557.1470-22.86 pp
14503048.9447+1.06 pp

Petrol

AgeLow-use fail %nNormal fail %nGap pp
510.0240924.05291-14.03 pp
613.6439625.35288-11.71 pp
714.1531829.19161-15.04 pp
816.858931.2532-14.4 pp

At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 14.2% vs 25.3% for 8–12k miles/year — 11.1 pp lower (n_low=4,162, n_normal=4,983). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates. Diesel alone: 14.8% low-use vs 25.1% normal (-10.3 pp).

Which Citroen C4 Picasso engine is best?

diesel 1.8–2.0 is highest at 120.9; petrol 1.5–1.8 is lowest at 81.4 — the gap is 39.5 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Engine bands against this model's own failure rate at the same ages
FuelCapacityvs own age normRaw fail %Tests
petrol1.5–1.8 litre81.423.89%360 (rough estimate)
petrol1.0–1.2 litre87.115.76%6,104
diesel1.5–1.8 litre101.621.07%27,170
diesel1.8–2.0 litre120.929.99%1,457 (rough estimate)

Splitting this model by fuel alone hides the thing that actually differs. Within the same badge, the diesel 1.5–1.8 runs at 101.6 against this model's own age norm while the petrol 1.0–1.2 runs at 87.1 — a spread of 14.5 points between two cars that share a name.

Read this one with more care than the rest of the page. Age is held constant, but who buys which engine is not: the largest capacity in a range is often a performance or executive variant that is garaged, cherished and lightly driven, while the smallest is frequently a fleet or entry car worked hard from new. The gap below is real in the test records; how much of it is the engine and how much is the owner, this data cannot separate. Bands under 100 tests are not shown; bands under 5,000 tests are rough estimates.

Best year for a Citroen C4 Picasso, and the years to avoid

Build year 2013 is highest at 128.4; Build year 2018 is lowest at 97.5 — the gap is 30.9 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

build year vs the same model at the same age · 100 = as expected

Citroen C4 Picasso build year vs the same model at the same age · 100 = as expected — 2024 UK MOT data
Citroen C4 Picasso by build year, tests 2019–2024. Below 100 is better than the model's own age norm.
Every build year with its confidence interval
Build yearvs own age norm95% CIRaw fail %TestsVerdict
201897.590.4–104.515.81%4,680no different
2017100.296.5–103.917.42%15,817no different
2016105.8101.2–110.420.92%9,788worse
2015114.8101.1–128.426.03%1,045worse
2014126.8109.7–14430.87%677worse
2013128.499.1–157.633.48%221no different

The best build year here is 2016 and the weakest is 2016. Comparing build years sounds simple and is not: within a single year of testing, a car's build year and its age are the same number, so a naive comparison of years is a comparison of ages wearing a disguise. Each year below is measured against the same model at the same age in other cohorts, across six years of testing — 1 of 6 years come out distinguishable from their own model's age norm.

Two limits worth knowing before you act on this. Age, test year and build year are locked together by arithmetic, so the test-year effect is taken from the observed national failure level of each year rather than estimated — it is an adjustment, not a solution.

Citroen C4 Picasso MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £41.72 to £79.27, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£42–79
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment10.6 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£14.84
Suspension6.2 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£11.16
Brakes6.1 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£9.15
Tyres7.3 (nat. 8.7)Tyre (single mid-range 16" fitted)£90£6.57

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £42 to £79, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Citroen C4 Picasso running costs for a fleet

Vehicles failing at age 10 stand out at 37.0%, against 22.0% at age 6, tested in the same year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fails per 100 at age 6
22
vehicles needing work (rough estimate: 1,160 tests)
At age 10
37
other cars of this model tested at age 10 in 2024 (rough estimate: 238 tests)
Repairs per 100
£4,172
plus £5,485 in test fees
Off the road
0d
median; 53.83% cleared same day
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
AgeFailsMedian odometerTestsGap vs age 5
621.55%42,8611,160—
722.9%49,1073,013—
828.93%55,0751,656—
928.11%67,913281—
1036.55%76,965238—
1141.73%79,601127—

No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).

Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.

Citroen C4 Picasso rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility is well below the reference at 0.57×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

How it rusts
0.57×
0.44% of tests record a corrosion defect vs 0.77% typical — age-standardised
Salt Belt exposure
68th
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 3 postcode areas

This Citroen C4 Picasso fails on corrosion much less often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are saltier than most for the models we publish. Both point the same way and reinforce each other: it resists corrosion even though its owners live in saltier areas than most.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Citroen C4 Picasso advisory become a failure?

Suspension is highest at 11.0%; Non-component advisories are lowest at 0.0% — the gap is 11.0 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

Citroen C4 Picasso chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now — 2024 UK MOT data
Citroen C4 Picasso, advisory → failure conversion by component group, chained tests 2019–2024. Chart labels and rates: Suspension 11% · Brakes 8.4% · Tyres 7.7% · Non-component 0%.
Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Suspension11.0%12 months7,1552,590
Brakes8.4%12 months6,5845,799
Tyres7.7%12 months6,7807,072
Non-component advisories0.0%——2,108

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 11 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12 months and roughly 7,155 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Citroen C4 Picasso?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 12-14 are highest at 34.4%; Suspension after a passed at age <3 is lowest at 2.0% — the gap is 32.4 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
<3passedTyres 3.6% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 2.6% · Suspension 2.0%3,244
<3advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 4.2% · Tyres 4.1% · Brakes 4.0%1,232
<3failureTyres 4.8% · Suspension 4.4% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 3.9%586
3-5passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 5.5% · Tyres 4.1% · Suspension 3.3%8,234
3-5advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 8.0% · Tyres 6.7% · Brakes 5.4%5,810
3-5failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 11.4% · Tyres 7.4% · Suspension 6.4%2,922
6-8passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 10.7% · Suspension 6.6% · Tyres 5.3%2,021
6-8advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 13.2% · Suspension 9.2% · Tyres 6.7%1,720
6-8failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 19.4% · Suspension 10.9% · Body, chassis, structure 7.8%1,352
9-11passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 16.5% · Suspension 10.5% · Brakes 8.3%218 (rough estimate)
9-11advisorySuspension 17.7% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 16.7% · Body, chassis, structure 10.4%192 (rough estimate)
9-11failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 17.3% · Suspension 14.4% · Brakes 11.8%306 (rough estimate)
12-14passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 27.2% · Visibility 13.0% · Suspension 10.9%92 (rough estimate)
12-14advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 33.3% · Suspension 14.9% · Visibility 13.2%114 (rough estimate)
12-14failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 34.4% · Visibility 19.8% · Suspension 16.7%192 (rough estimate)

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Citroen C4 Picasso ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The same-day re-test pass rate is highest at 53.8%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 1.8% — the gap is 52.0 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
53.83%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
0.322
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
35.72%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
0.895%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 5,367 failures followed through to their re-test, 53.83% were repaired and passed the same day and 44.38% within ten days; the median gap is 0 days. 10,612 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.322 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 6,083 miles a year across 6,811 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 35.72% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 26.08% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 0.895% of 6,814 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 9,599 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Citroen C4 Picasso safety recalls and how to check yours

DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 37.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

recall campaigns launched per year

Citroen C4 Picasso recall campaigns launched per year — 2024 UK MOT data
Campaigns launched per year for the Citroen C4 Picasso. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls. Chart values: 2011: 2 · 2012: 2 · 2013: 0 · 2014: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2023: 0 · 2024: 1 · 2025: 1.
Most recent safety recall campaigns for the Citroen C4 Picasso
ReferenceLaunchedVehiclesConcern
R/2025/34618/08/2025558Emission recall – On Board Diagnostics
R/2024/13613/03/2024120Cross carline Engine software
R/2023/03613/12/202213,740On the affected vehicles the operation of the brake vacuum pump may be affected by materia
R/2023/04613/12/2022652On the affected vehicles the operation of the brake vacuum pump may be affected by materia
R/2020/32720/01/202121,226THE BRAKE VACUUM PUMP MAY BE AFFECTED BY MATERIAL DETACHING FROM THE TIMING BELT
All 37 campaigns
ReferenceLaunchedBuild datesVehiclesConcern
R/2025/34618/08/202512/12/2017 – 28/11/2020558Emission recall – On Board Diagnostics
R/2024/13613/03/202404/01/2022 – 27/06/2022120Cross carline Engine software
R/2023/03613/12/202203/04/2017 – 11/12/202013,740On the affected vehicles the operation of the brake vacuum pump may be affected by materia
R/2023/04613/12/202202/03/2017 – 31/03/2017652On the affected vehicles the operation of the brake vacuum pump may be affected by materia
R/2020/32720/01/202120/03/2013 – 01/04/201721,226THE BRAKE VACUUM PUMP MAY BE AFFECTED BY MATERIAL DETACHING FROM THE TIMING BELT
R/2020/33013/11/202001/04/2019 – 15/07/2019432THE FILTERING PERFORMANCE OF THE DIESEL PARTICULATE FILTER MAY NOT MEET THE REQUIRED SPECI
R/2020/24419/08/202001/10/2019 – 17/03/20201,689THE UREA INJECTOR MAY BLOCK AND LEAD TO NOx EMISSIONS GOING OUT OF REGULATORY LIMITS
R/2019/32926/09/201925/09/2013 – 15/05/20165,290DUE TO THE CALIBRATION OF THE ENGINE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE NOX EMISSIONS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH
R/2018/18719/07/201804/05/2018 – 30/05/201837Engine oil gallery sealing plug incorrectly tightened
R/2018/12810/05/201810/11/2017 – 14/11/2017110AIRBAGS MAY NOT BE TRIGGERED IN THE EVENT OF A COLLISION
R/2018/04913/02/201805/12/2012 – 21/04/20152,098ENGINE MAY OVERHEAT
R/2017/33915/12/201701/10/2017 – 30/11/201775ENGINE COMPONENT MAY NOT BE TO SPECIFICATION
R/2017/32605/12/201701/09/2016 – 06/04/20176,848BONNET SKIN MAY BECOME INSECURE
R/2017/26922/09/201728/06/2016 – 15/07/20169STARTER MOTOR SUPPLY WIRING HARNESS MAY BECOME DAMAGED
R/2017/13924/04/201715/06/2016 – 11/10/20163,607STARTER MOTOR MAY NOT OPERATE CORRECTLY
R/2016/27629/11/201621/11/2014 – 26/01/20152,662FRONT SUSPENSION MAY FAIL
R/2016/05531/03/201618/08/2015 – 19/11/2015919DOOR MAY OPEN UNEXPECTEDLY
R/2016/05731/03/201614/09/2015 – 10/11/20152,238SEAT BELT BUCKLE STRAP MAY FAIL
R/2016/05231/03/201619/08/2015 – 21/11/20151,292DOOR MAY OPEN UNEXPECTEDLY
R/2016/05431/03/201605/05/2015 – 20/11/20151,914DOOR MAY OPEN UNEXPECTEDLY
R/2016/04210/03/201625/01/2016 – 15/02/201617OIL LEAK MAY DAMAGE ENGINE
R/2015/26104/01/201618/08/2015 – 20/11/20151,939DOORS MAY OPEN UNEXPECTEDLY
R/2015/24308/12/201501/09/2012 – 02/01/20149,483FUEL MAY LEAK
R/2015/10126/05/201526/03/2013 – 20/11/201423,035POSSIBILITY OF LOSS OF CONTROL
R/2014/16917/12/201411/04/2013 – 13/11/201352THE INCORRECT GEAR MAYBE SELECTED
R/2014/02526/02/201407/01/2014 – 15/07/2014279FUEL MAY LEAK AND CREATE FIRE RISK
R/2012/09405/10/201206/07/2006 – 01/10/20109,848RISK OF FIRE
R/2012/02608/03/201222/11/2011 – 22/11/201188SEAT BELT FIXING BOLTS MAY LOOSEN
R/2011/04918/04/201106/07/2006 – 11/05/20078,230ELECTRIC PARKING BRAKE MAY MALFUNCTION
R/2011/01822/02/201108/07/2010 – 13/10/201033FUEL MAY LEAK
R/2010/06004/06/201002/12/2009 – 03/12/2009134FRONT SEAT BELT MAY NOT LOCK CORRECTLY
R/2008/19924/12/200801/02/2008 – 14/06/20086,031WIPERS / LIGHTS/ BATTERY CHARGING MAY BE AFFECTED.
R/2008/16314/11/200806/07/2006 – 11/05/20079,398PARKING BRAKE MAY BE INEFFECTIVE
R/2008/13318/09/200812/09/2006 – 30/10/2006143FRONT BRAKE CALIPER MAY BECOME INSECURE
R/2008/10701/08/200828/02/2007 – 28/06/2007367RISK OF PARTIAL DE-BONDING OF GLASS PANORAMIC ROOF MOULDING.
R/2008/11116/07/200816/05/2006 – 22/12/2006307VACUUM BRAKING ASSISTANCE MAY REDUCE.
R/2007/10920/07/200705/09/2006 – 31/03/2007101SEAT BELT MAY FAIL IN A COLLISION

DVSA lists 37 safety recall campaigns for the Citroen C4 Picasso, covering roughly 135,001 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.

Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.

Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.

Citroen C4 Picasso inspection results in other countries

Finland Katsastus stands out at 43.7%, against 26.3% nationally.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Same model, different national inspection regimes
CountryTestThis model failsNational averagePositionSample
United KingdomMOT (class 4)26.14%26.01%+0.1 pp6,779
NetherlandsAPK52.7%50.8%+1.9 pp19,443
NorwayPKK38.8%33.7%+5.1 pp2,771
FinlandKatsastus43.7%26.3%+17.4 pp2,441

The verdict is consistent across every regime where the difference is clear, which is the strongest form this comparison takes: independent inspectorates, different rulebooks, same direction of travel.

What Finland fails it for — share of recorded faults
Fault areaShare
Axles, wheels and suspension40.4%
Brake systems17.3%
Chassis and body14.4%
Environmental hazards13.8%
Steering equipment9.5%

Useful as a cross-check on the UK defect table above: the categories are named differently, but a component that dominates in both regimes is a genuine weak point of the model rather than an artefact of one country's testing style.

The exact faults Netherlands records — APK defect codes, 2024
CodeFaultRecordedType
210Tyre pressure not at the correct value3,967failure
205Tyre with insufficient tread3,130failure
497Number-plate light not working or missing2,399failure
AC1Tyre down to 1.6–2.5 mm of tread1,583advisory
516Dipped headlight incorrectly aimed1,505failure
584Sidelight not working properly1,201failure
RA2Excessive leak of other fluids944advisory
391Wipers leave insufficient visibility856failure

Worth dwelling on how mundane the top of that list is: tyre pressure, tread depth, headlight aim. The Dutch APK records 1.263 defects per inspection against a much higher national failure rate than Britain's, and the reason is not that Dutch cars are worse — it is that the two regimes draw the line between "note it" and "fail it" in different places. Codes are the RDW's own; the English wording here is our translation of the Dutch original.

Britain is not the only country that inspects every car every year, and the Citroen C4 Picasso is on the road in all of them. Each national regime writes its own rules, so the pass rates below are not comparable to each other — what does travel across a border is whether a model sits above or below its own country's average.

Rows with fewer than 500 inspections are not published. Sources: RDW open data — Meldingen Keuringsinstantie + Geconstateerde Gebreken + Gekentekende voertuigen (2024), CC0. Not an RDW endorsement.; Statens vegvesen — Periodisk kjøretøykontroll (PKK) 2024, CC BY 4.0; Traficom — Periodic inspections of cars by model / by model and fault object 2024, CC BY 4.0. Adapted; licences and full notice.

Citroen C4 Picasso MOT: quick answers

Citroen C4 Picasso MOT Risk Index stands out at 118.7, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Citroen C4 Picasso first-time MOT pass rate?
73.86% of first attempts passed in 2024 (6,779 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 26.14% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 6,779 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 118.7 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Citroen C4 Picasso with other cars

Citroen C3 is highest at 118.8; Renault Modus is lowest at 118.6 — the gap is 0.2 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Citroen MOT statisticsCitroen C3 MOT statsCitroen Xsara MOT stats

Similar risk

Vauxhall Corsa (index 118.7)Citroen C3 (index 118.8)Renault Modus (index 118.6)

Same size class

how Alfa Romeo Giulia compareshow Suzuki Baleno compareshow Vauxhall Tigra compares

By build year

Citroen C4 Picasso 2013Citroen C4 Picasso 2014Citroen C4 Picasso 2015Citroen C4 Picasso 2016Citroen C4 Picasso 2017Citroen C4 Picasso 2018

By area

Citroen C4 Picasso MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Citroen C4 Picasso body, chassis and structure failuresCitroen C4 Picasso brakes failuresCitroen C4 Picasso vehicle identification failuresCitroen C4 Picasso lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresCitroen C4 Picasso noise, emissions and leaks failuresCitroen C4 Picasso road wheels failuresCitroen C4 Picasso seat belts and airbags failuresCitroen C4 Picasso steering failuresCitroen C4 Picasso suspension failuresCitroen C4 Picasso tyres failuresCitroen C4 Picasso visibility failures

Inspections abroad

Citroen C4 Picasso in NorwayCitroen C4 Picasso in FinlandCitroen C4 Picasso in the Netherlands


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:citroen-c4-picasso:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Citroen C4 Picasso MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/citroen-c4-picasso/ · Published 2026-07-30.