Chevrolet Kalos — MOT statistics 2024
The Chevrolet Kalos failed 52.96% of 2,430 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 122.3 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 22% more often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.
Age-adjusted peer: Mazda 5 (index 122.4) — the two published results are 0.1 index points apart.
Chevrolet Kalos common problems: what actually fails the MOT
Brakes stand out at 34.4 per 100 tests, against 20.0 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.
Component-group comparison table
Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.
| Group | This family | Cases behind it | UK, same ages | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamps & electrical | 43.9 | 12,678 | 33.2 | 1.32×1.30–1.34 |
| Suspension | 40.1 | 11,584 | 28.7 | 1.40×1.37–1.42 |
| Brakes | 34.4 | 9,945 | 20.0 | 1.72×1.69–1.75 |
| Visibility | 16.0 | 4,630 | 11.0 | 1.45×1.41–1.50 |
| Body & structure | 13.8 | 3,990 | 11.0 | 1.25×1.21–1.29 |
| Steering | 13.4 | 3,863 | 5.0 | 2.69×2.59–2.76 |
| What failed | per 100 tests (this family) | per 100 tests (UK average) | ratio family / UK | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | 21.53 | 4.87 | 4.42× | Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test |
| Strength or continuity of the load bearing…The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | 9.52 | 1.12 | 8.52× | Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings |
| Headlamp reflector or lens slightly defectiveHeadlamp reflector or lens slightly defective | 8.76 | 1.09 | 8.01× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Steering ball joint with excessive wear or free playA steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play | 8.48 | 1.22 | 6.93× | Ask the seller about: A steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play |
| Significant brake effort recorded with no brake…Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake | 8.06 | 1.03 | 7.83× | Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive |
| Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | 8.10 | 2.57 | 3.16× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Warning device shows system malfunctionWarning device shows system malfunction | 5.16 | 0.39 | 13.16× | Ask the seller about: Warning device shows system malfunction |
| Brake pipe damaged or excessively corrodedBrake pipe damaged or excessively corroded | 6.00 | 1.41 | 4.27× | Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings |
| Lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a…A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | 5.54 | 2.09 | 2.65× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the…Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen | 5.59 | 2.22 | 2.51× | Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view |
Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.
Chevrolet Kalos MOT advisories: what gets flagged
Suspension is highest at 55.1 per 100 tests; Body & structure are lowest at 9.0 per 100 tests — the gap is 46.1 per 100 tests.
higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests
Advisory rates table
| Group | Advisories per 100 |
|---|---|
| Suspension | 55.1 |
| Brakes | 46.6 |
| Tyres | 40.9 |
| Emissions & leaks | 14.5 |
| Lamps & electrical | 10.3 |
| Body & structure | 9 |
Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.
If a car like this fails, does it fail again?
A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.
| After this year's test | Fails next year | Vehicles followed |
|---|---|---|
| It failed | 48.0% | 2,429 |
| It passed | 45.5% | 9,415 |
A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 2.5 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment — 43.5% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.
Adjusted for how much these are actually driven
The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 28,422 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.
| Standardised for | Index | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Age only | 124.9 | fails more often than expected |
| Age and annual mileage | 140.9 | fails more often than vehicles driven as much |
| Share doing under 3,000 miles a year | 19.4% | a normal spread of use |
Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 16.0 points — this fleet is driven less than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view flatters it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.
How the Chevrolet Kalos compares with cars of its own age and size
Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.
| Age | Chevrolet Kalos | Same class, same age | Difference | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 years | 50.7% | 38.65% | +12.05 pp | 1,862 |
| 12 years | 50.68% | 41.24% | +9.44 pp | 4,203 |
| 13 years | 53.19% | 43.28% | +9.91 pp | 5,153 |
| 14 years | 53.71% | 45.02% | +8.69 pp | 5,807 |
| 15 years | 54.83% | 46.3% | +8.53 pp | 4,556 |
| 16 years | 53.02% | 47.34% | +5.69 pp | 3,523 |
| 17 years | 53.06% | 47.78% | +5.28 pp | 2,252 |
| 18 years | 54.82% | 47.99% | +6.83 pp | 1,100 |
| 19 years | 55.05% | 47.73% | +7.31 pp | 416 |
Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.
How does the Chevrolet Kalos perform as it gets older?
The Kalos at age 16 stands out at 55.0%, against 43.1% for all vehicles of the same age.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–59%.
Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars; from about age 16 it stays above the national age curve.
Data table
| Age | Chevrolet Kalos | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | 55.0% | 43.1% | +11.9 pp |
| 17 | 51.3% | 43.1% | +8.2 pp |
| 18 | 51.9% | 43.9% | +8.1 pp |
| 19 | 55.0% | 43.5% | +11.6 pp |
Is a Chevrolet Kalos ULEZ compliant?
The share of classifiable 2024 Chevrolet Kalos MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 82.8%.
Based on 2,422 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.
higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class
| Vehicle age at test | Likely ULEZ-compliant share | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| Under 3 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 3–5 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 6–7 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 8 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 9 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 10–14 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 1 |
| 15–17 years | 99.9% Check a registration with TfL | n = 1,486 |
| 18 years | 100.0% Check a registration with TfL | n = 519 |
| 19 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 416 |
| 20+ years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
How dangerous are Chevrolet Kalos MOT failures?
Major defects stand out at 148.1 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
Severity table
| Severity | This family /100 | National /100 | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minor | 25.54 | 14.22 | 1.80× |
| Major | 148.05 | 52.75 | 2.81× |
| Dangerous | 15.66 | 11.15 | 1.40× |
Chart values: Minor 25.5 · Major 148.1 · Dangerous 15.7.
Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.
Does the month of a Chevrolet Kalos MOT matter?
Nov is highest at 54.8%; May is lowest at 51.4% — the gap is 3.3 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart scale: 27%–56%.
bars: Chevrolet Kalos · dashed: all class-4 cars
Month-by-month table
| Month | Chevrolet Kalos | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 54.56% | 31.12% | +23.4 pp |
| Feb | 52.16% | 29.99% | +22.2 pp |
| Mar | 52.48% | 28.26% | +24.2 pp |
| Apr | 53.74% | 29.78% | +24.0 pp |
| May | 51.42% | 28.79% | +22.6 pp |
| Jun | 53.31% | 28.15% | +25.2 pp |
| Jul | 52.74% | 29.33% | +23.4 pp |
| Aug | 52.61% | 29.2% | +23.4 pp |
| Sep | 53.44% | 28.19% | +25.2 pp |
| Oct | 52.66% | 30.34% | +22.3 pp |
| Nov | 54.75% | 30.58% | +24.2 pp |
| Dec | 52.79% | 29.33% | +23.5 pp |
Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 3.3 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.
Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.
Chevrolet Kalos average mileage by age
At age 18, the middle half of Kalos models runs from 49,612 miles to 85,745 miles, against 65,080 miles as the median.
further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75
Chart axes: car age, years · odometer scale 0–90k mi.
Does high mileage mean more Chevrolet Kalos MOT failures at the same age?
Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 15+, 42.7% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 62.1% of those with 100,000–140,000 miles.Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.
| Age | Odometer | % failing | 95% interval | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15+ | <40k miles | 42.7% | 37.8–47.9% | 365 (rough estimate) |
| 15+ | 40-70k miles | 49.2% | 46.1–52.2% | 1,019 |
| 15+ | 70-100k miles | 60% | 56.5–63.4% | 767 |
| 15+ | 100-140k miles | 62.1% | 55.2–68.5% | 203 (rough estimate) |
line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)
Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
| Age | p25 | Median | p75 | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | 42,595 | 59,412 | 76,425 | 631 |
| 17 | 49,492 | 65,221 | 84,055 | 852 |
| 18 | 49,612 | 65,080 | 85,745 | 520 |
| 19 | 51,628 | 66,223 | 84,656 | 416 |
A typical 18-year-old Kalos has ~65,080 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.
Where in Britain the Chevrolet Kalos fails its MOT most
Hull area is highest at 69.3%; London SW area is lowest at 34.0% — the gap is 35.3 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Toughest areas | % failing | vs model overall |
|---|---|---|
| Hull (HU) | 69.28% | +16.2 pp |
| Edinburgh (EH) | 67.84% | +14.8 pp |
| Kirkcaldy (KY) | 67.72% | +14.6 pp |
| Telford (TF) | 65.69% | +12.6 pp |
| Darlington (DL) | 65.33% | +12.3 pp |
| Easiest areas | % failing | vs model overall |
|---|---|---|
| London SW (SW) | 33.98% | -19.1 pp |
| Luton (LU) | 36.4% | -16.7 pp |
| Enfield (EN) | 39.52% | -13.6 pp |
| Southend-on-Sea (SS) | 40.43% | -12.6 pp |
| London N (N) | 41.21% | -11.9 pp |
Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.
Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 42%–63% failing.
How many miles does a Chevrolet Kalos last?
100,000+ miles stands out at 9.0%.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Odometer | Tests ≥ threshold | Share of sample |
|---|---|---|
| 100,000+ miles | 2,567 | 9.03% |
Of 28,429 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 9.0% had reached 100k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.
Chevrolet Kalos faults that come together
Road Wheels + Tyres stand out at 3.96×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.
above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less
| Group A | Group B | Together | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Road Wheels | Tyres | 34 | 3.96× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Noise, emissions and leaks | 732 | 3.35× |
| Brakes | Road Wheels | 60 | 2.81× (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Noise, emissions and leaks | 30 | 2.81× (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 99 | 2.7× (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Tyres | 31 | 2.67× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 304 | 2.63× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Road Wheels | 20 | 2.54× (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 21 | 2.53× (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Visibility | 47 | 2.5× (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Steering | 30 | 2.44× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 748 | 2.39× |
| Brakes | Noise, emissions and leaks | 958 | 2.38× |
| Body, chassis, structure | Identification of the vehicle | 37 | 2.35× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Road Wheels | 63 | 2.33× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Tyres | 373 | 2.31× (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Visibility | 31 | 2.23× (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Suspension | 859 | 2.22× |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Visibility | 579 | 2.22× |
| Identification of the vehicle | Suspension | 79 | 2.21× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Noise, emissions and leaks | 1,098 | 2.16× |
| Tyres | Visibility | 613 | 2.15× |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Visibility | 429 | 2.11× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Visibility | 1,854 | 2.07× |
| Body, chassis, structure | Brakes | 1,227 | 2.07× |
| Body, chassis, structure | Road Wheels | 24 | 2.07× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Steering | 472 | 2.04× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Identification of the vehicle | 59 | 2.04× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 345 | 2.03× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 802 | 2.02× |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Suspension | 999 | 2.01× |
| Road Wheels | Suspension | 53 | 2.01× (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Steering | 33 | 1.98× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Suspension | 2,657 | 1.97× |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Tyres | 248 | 1.97× (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Tyres | 491 | 1.95× (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Suspension | 1,499 | 1.94× |
| Brakes | Tyres | 838 | 1.91× |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Steering | 345 | 1.91× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Visibility | 1,348 | 1.9× |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Tyres | 1,050 | 1.9× |
| Brakes | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 2,616 | 1.89× |
| Body, chassis, structure | Visibility | 729 | 1.89× |
| Body, chassis, structure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 1,410 | 1.88× |
| Suspension | Tyres | 1,014 | 1.88× |
| Body, chassis, structure | Suspension | 1,367 | 1.87× |
| Body, chassis, structure | Tyres | 445 | 1.87× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Steering | 1,451 | 1.83× |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Suspension | 3,097 | 1.82× |
| Brakes | Steering | 1,137 | 1.81× |
| Body, chassis, structure | Steering | 617 | 1.81× |
| Suspension | Visibility | 1,532 | 1.75× |
| Steering | Visibility | 712 | 1.75× |
| Road Wheels | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 16 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Speedometer and speed limiter | 6 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Seat belt installation check | 5 | too few (rough estimate) |
Defects in «Body, chassis, structure» and «Noise, emissions and leaks» appear together 3.35× more often than chance (732 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).
Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).
Is low mileage better for a Chevrolet Kalos?
Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 44.9%, against 62.5% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Band | Fail % | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| <5k miles/year | 44.92% | 8,907 |
| 8–12k miles/year | 62.51% | 1,131 |
| Gap (low − normal) | -17.59 pp | — |
By fuel and age
Petrol
| Age | Low-use fail % | n | Normal fail % | n | Gap pp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 40.41 | 824 | 62.74 | 212 | -22.32 pp |
| 12 | 43.19 | 1,996 | 57.73 | 343 | -14.54 pp |
| 13 | 47.39 | 2,722 | 65.34 | 326 | -17.95 pp |
| 14 | 47.96 | 3,361 | 65.2 | 250 | -17.24 pp |
At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 44.9% vs 62.5% for 8–12k miles/year — 17.6 pp lower (n_low=8,907, n_normal=1,131). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates.
Best year for a Chevrolet Kalos, and the years to avoid
Build year 2005 is highest at 102.6; Build year 2007 is lowest at 96.3 — the gap is 6.3 points.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
build year vs the same model at the same age · 100 = as expected
Every build year with its confidence interval
| Build year | vs own age norm | 95% CI | Raw fail % | Tests | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 98.7 | 95.5–101.9 | 52.24% | 7,023 | no different |
| 2007 | 96.3 | 93.7–99 | 51.53% | 9,833 | better |
| 2006 | 98.1 | 94.8–101.4 | 53.55% | 6,398 | no different |
| 2005 | 102.6 | 99–106.1 | 56.38% | 5,576 | no different |
The best build year here is 2007 and the weakest is 2007. Comparing build years sounds simple and is not: within a single year of testing, a car's build year and its age are the same number, so a naive comparison of years is a comparison of ages wearing a disguise. Each year below is measured against the same model at the same age in other cohorts, across six years of testing — 1 of 4 years come out distinguishable from their own model's age norm.
Two limits worth knowing before you act on this. Age, test year and build year are locked together by arithmetic, so the test-year effect is taken from the observed national failure level of each year rather than estimated — it is an adjustment, not a solution.
Chevrolet Kalos MOT repair costs
The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £185.24 to £351.96, against £54.85 for the test itself.
bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only
| Component | Fails per 100 tests | Typical repair | Its price | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 40.1 (nat. 15.36) | Suspension coil spring (single corner) | £180 | £72.18 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 43.9 (nat. 18.09) | Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid) | £140 | £61.46 |
| Brakes | 34.4 (nat. 11.25) | Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback) | £150 | £51.60 |
Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £185 to £352, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.
Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.
For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.
Chevrolet Kalos running costs for a fleet
Vehicles failing at age 19 are close to the reference at 55.0%, against 55.0% at age 16, tested in the same year.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
| Age | Fails | Median odometer | Tests | Gap vs age 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | 54.99% | 59,412 | 631 | — |
| 17 | 51.29% | 65,221 | 852 | — |
| 18 | 51.92% | 65,080 | 520 | — |
| 19 | 55.05% | 66,223 | 416 | — |
No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).
Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.
Chevrolet Kalos rust problems: where they corrode
Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility stands out at 4.55×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.
above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less
This Chevrolet Kalos fails on corrosion far more often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are gentler than most for the models we publish. Those two point in opposite directions, which is the informative case: it rusts more than average despite living in gentler places, so the cause is the car, not the postcode.
Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.
Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.
Does a Chevrolet Kalos advisory become a failure?
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment are highest at 37.2%; Non-component advisories are lowest at 0.0% — the gap is 37.2 percentage points.
higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability
chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now
| Component | Fails next time | Typical lead time | Miles of warning | Advisories tracked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 37.1% | 12.1 months | 3,422 | 1,381 |
| Suspension | 29.5% | 12 months | 3,550 | 6,212 |
| Steering | 29.3% | 12 months | 4,201 | 839 |
| Brakes | 25.6% | 12.1 months | 2,817 | 5,468 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 19.5% | 12 months | 3,440 | 1,434 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 10.8% | 12.1 months | 3,858 | 2,643 |
| Tyres | 10.7% | 12.1 months | 3,530 | 5,316 |
| Identification of the vehicle | 3.3% | 12 months | 3,872 | 988 |
| Non-component advisories | 0.0% | — | — | 1,439 |
This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.
Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 37 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.1 months and roughly 3,422 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.
What will fail next on a Chevrolet Kalos?
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 15-19 are highest at 35.3%; Brakes after a passed at age 15-19 are lowest at 13.0% — the gap is 22.4 percentage points.
higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability
| Age | Last test | Most likely next failures | Cars tracked |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9-11 | passed | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 16.3% · Suspension 15.6% · Brakes 13.4% | 873 |
| 9-11 | advisory | Suspension 21.7% · Brakes 18.1% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 18.1% | 888 |
| 9-11 | failure | Suspension 28.2% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 25.0% · Brakes 24.9% | 1,586 |
| 12-14 | passed | Suspension 17.8% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 16.9% · Brakes 13.3% | 2,638 |
| 12-14 | advisory | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 23.4% · Suspension 22.3% · Brakes 18.0% | 3,326 |
| 12-14 | failure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 30.0% · Suspension 27.6% · Brakes 22.2% | 6,113 |
| 15-19 | passed | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 19.2% · Suspension 15.5% · Brakes 13.0% | 1,080 |
| 15-19 | advisory | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 27.1% · Suspension 23.5% · Brakes 17.5% | 1,624 |
| 15-19 | failure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 35.3% · Suspension 29.3% · Brakes 19.8% | 2,887 |
The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.
The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.
Chevrolet Kalos ownership: what six years of MOTs show
The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 62.2%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 3.8% — the gap is 58.4 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 11,030 failures followed through to their re-test, 33.98% were repaired and passed the same day and 62.19% within ten days; the median gap is 1 day. 36,416 defect items were cleared in the process.
Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 1.376 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 2,742 miles a year across 6,299 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.
Two populations hide inside one model. 16.63% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 44.36% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.
Odometer anomalies: 1.092% of 6,320 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 8,534 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.
Chevrolet Kalos safety recalls and how to check yours
DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 1.
bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone
| Reference | Launched | Vehicles | Concern |
|---|---|---|---|
R/2012/090 | 28/08/2012 | 38,876 | BRAKING EFFICIENCY MAY BE AFFECTED |
DVSA lists 1 safety recall campaigns for the Chevrolet Kalos, covering roughly 38,876 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.
Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.
Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.
Chevrolet Kalos inspection results in other countries
Finland Katsastus stands out at 55.3%, against 26.3% nationally.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Country | Test | This model fails | National average | Position | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | MOT (class 4) | 52.96% | 26.01% | +26.9 pp | 2,430 |
| Netherlands | APK | 72.4% | 50.8% | +21.6 pp | 3,224 |
| Finland | Katsastus | 55.3% | 26.3% | +29 pp | 913 |
The verdict is consistent across every regime where the difference is clear, which is the strongest form this comparison takes: independent inspectorates, different rulebooks, same direction of travel.
| Fault area | Share |
|---|---|
| Axles, wheels and suspension | 27.1% |
| Brake systems | 24.8% |
| Chassis and body | 21.6% |
| Environmental hazards | 12.3% |
| Steering equipment | 7% |
Useful as a cross-check on the UK defect table above: the categories are named differently, but a component that dominates in both regimes is a genuine weak point of the model rather than an artefact of one country's testing style.
| Code | Fault | Recorded | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
210 | Tyre pressure not at the correct value | 581 | failure |
205 | Tyre with insufficient tread | 464 | failure |
RA2 | Excessive leak of other fluids | 373 | advisory |
522 | Dipped-beam cut-off line unclear | 341 | failure |
516 | Dipped headlight incorrectly aimed | 307 | failure |
RA6 | Waarschuwingsinrichting antiblokkeersysteem geeft defect aan | 277 | advisory |
289 | Schijf-, trommelrem loopt niet vrij | 273 | failure |
391 | Wipers leave insufficient visibility | 271 | failure |
Worth dwelling on how mundane the top of that list is: tyre pressure, tread depth, headlight aim. The Dutch APK records 2.147 defects per inspection against a much higher national failure rate than Britain's, and the reason is not that Dutch cars are worse — it is that the two regimes draw the line between "note it" and "fail it" in different places. Codes are the RDW's own; the English wording here is our translation of the Dutch original.
Britain is not the only country that inspects every car every year, and the Chevrolet Kalos is on the road in all of them. Each national regime writes its own rules, so the pass rates below are not comparable to each other — what does travel across a border is whether a model sits above or below its own country's average.
Rows with fewer than 500 inspections are not published. Sources: RDW open data — Meldingen Keuringsinstantie + Geconstateerde Gebreken + Gekentekende voertuigen (2024), CC0. Not an RDW endorsement.; Traficom — Periodic inspections of cars by model / by model and fault object 2024, CC BY 4.0. Adapted; licences and full notice.
Chevrolet Kalos MOT: quick answers
Chevrolet Kalos MOT Risk Index stands out at 122.3, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
- What is the Chevrolet Kalos first-time MOT pass rate?
- 47.04% of first attempts passed in 2024 (2,430 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
- Why does this number differ from other sites?
- Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 52.96% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 2,430 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 122.3 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.
Compare the Chevrolet Kalos with other cars
Mazda 5 is highest at 122.4; Fiat 500e is lowest at 122.1 — the gap is 0.3 points.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
Same brand
All Chevrolet MOT statisticsChevrolet Spark MOT statsChevrolet Lacetti MOT stats
Similar risk
Mazda 5 (index 122.4)Fiat 500e (index 122.1)Renault Scenic (index 122.1)
Same size class
how Audi S4 compareshow TVR Chimaera compareshow Nissan Figaro compares
By build year
Chevrolet Kalos 2005Chevrolet Kalos 2006Chevrolet Kalos 2007Chevrolet Kalos 2008
By area
Chevrolet Kalos MOT failure rate by postcode area
By failure group
Chevrolet Kalos body, chassis and structure failuresChevrolet Kalos brakes failuresChevrolet Kalos vehicle identification failuresChevrolet Kalos lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresChevrolet Kalos noise, emissions and leaks failuresChevrolet Kalos road wheels failuresChevrolet Kalos seat belts and airbags failuresChevrolet Kalos steering failuresChevrolet Kalos suspension failuresChevrolet Kalos tyres failuresChevrolet Kalos visibility failures
Inspections abroad
Chevrolet Kalos in FinlandChevrolet Kalos in the Netherlands
Data details & how to cite
Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:chevrolet-kalos:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.
Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Chevrolet Kalos MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/chevrolet-kalos/ · Published 2026-07-30.