MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Chevrolet Kalos — MOT statistics 2024

The Chevrolet Kalos failed 52.96% of 2,430 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 122.3 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 22% more often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

MOT risk index 122.3, 95% CI 117.7–126.9 (100 = national average) 100 122.3 0 200
Index
122.3
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
52.96%
n = 2,430
Dangerous /100
16
national ≈11
Rank
667 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Mazda 5 (index 122.4) — the two published results are 0.1 index points apart.

Chevrolet Kalos common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Brakes stand out at 34.4 per 100 tests, against 20.0 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Chevrolet Kalos common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Lamps & electrical43.912,67833.21.32×1.30–1.34
Suspension40.111,58428.71.40×1.37–1.42
Brakes34.49,94520.01.72×1.69–1.75
Visibility16.04,63011.01.45×1.41–1.50
Body & structure13.83,99011.01.25×1.21–1.29
Steering13.43,8635.02.69×2.59–2.76
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 28,900 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn21.534.874.42×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Strength or continuity of the load bearing…The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired9.521.128.52×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Headlamp reflector or lens slightly defectiveHeadlamp reflector or lens slightly defective8.761.098.01×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Steering ball joint with excessive wear or free playA steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play8.481.226.93×Ask the seller about: A steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play
Significant brake effort recorded with no brake…Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake8.061.037.83×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements8.102.573.16×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Warning device shows system malfunctionWarning device shows system malfunction5.160.3913.16×Ask the seller about: Warning device shows system malfunction
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corrodedBrake pipe damaged or excessively corroded6.001.414.27×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a…A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning5.542.092.65×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the…Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen5.592.222.51×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Chevrolet Kalos MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Suspension is highest at 55.1 per 100 tests; Body & structure are lowest at 9.0 per 100 tests — the gap is 46.1 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Chevrolet Kalos MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Suspension55.1
Brakes46.6
Tyres40.9
Emissions & leaks14.5
Lamps & electrical10.3
Body & structure9

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed48.0%2,429
It passed45.5%9,415

A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 2.5 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment — 43.5% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 28,422 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only124.9fails more often than expected
Age and annual mileage140.9fails more often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year19.4%a normal spread of use

Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 16.0 points — this fleet is driven less than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view flatters it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Chevrolet Kalos compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

AgeChevrolet KalosSame class, same ageDifferenceTests
11 years50.7%38.65%+12.05 pp1,862
12 years50.68%41.24%+9.44 pp4,203
13 years53.19%43.28%+9.91 pp5,153
14 years53.71%45.02%+8.69 pp5,807
15 years54.83%46.3%+8.53 pp4,556
16 years53.02%47.34%+5.69 pp3,523
17 years53.06%47.78%+5.28 pp2,252
18 years54.82%47.99%+6.83 pp1,100
19 years55.05%47.73%+7.31 pp416

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Chevrolet Kalos perform as it gets older?

The Kalos at age 16 stands out at 55.0%, against 43.1% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the Chevrolet Kalos perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–59%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars; from about age 16 it stays above the national age curve.

Data table
AgeChevrolet KalosAll vehiclesGap
1655.0%43.1%+11.9 pp
1751.3%43.1%+8.2 pp
1851.9%43.9%+8.1 pp
1955.0%43.5%+11.6 pp

Is a Chevrolet Kalos ULEZ compliant?

The share of classifiable 2024 Chevrolet Kalos MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 82.8%.

Based on 2,422 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.

higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class

Age-band estimate from classifiable initial MOT tests
Vehicle age at testLikely ULEZ-compliant shareTests
Under 3 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
3–5 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
6–7 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
8 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
9 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
10–14 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 1
15–17 years99.9%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 1,486
18 years100.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 519
19 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 416
20+ yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0

How dangerous are Chevrolet Kalos MOT failures?

Major defects stand out at 148.1 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Chevrolet Kalos MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor25.5414.221.80×
Major148.0552.752.81×
Dangerous15.6611.151.40×

Chart values: Minor 25.5 · Major 148.1 · Dangerous 15.7.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Chevrolet Kalos MOT matter?

Nov is highest at 54.8%; May is lowest at 51.4% — the gap is 3.3 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Chevrolet Kalos MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 27%–56%.

bars: Chevrolet Kalos · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthChevrolet KalosAll vehiclesGap
Jan54.56%31.12%+23.4 pp
Feb52.16%29.99%+22.2 pp
Mar52.48%28.26%+24.2 pp
Apr53.74%29.78%+24.0 pp
May51.42%28.79%+22.6 pp
Jun53.31%28.15%+25.2 pp
Jul52.74%29.33%+23.4 pp
Aug52.61%29.2%+23.4 pp
Sep53.44%28.19%+25.2 pp
Oct52.66%30.34%+22.3 pp
Nov54.75%30.58%+24.2 pp
Dec52.79%29.33%+23.5 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 3.3 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Chevrolet Kalos average mileage by age

At age 18, the middle half of Kalos models runs from 49,612 miles to 85,745 miles, against 65,080 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Bars: Chevrolet Kalos · dashed: all class-4 cars — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · odometer scale 0–90k mi.

Does high mileage mean more Chevrolet Kalos MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 15+, 42.7% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 62.1% of those with 100,000–140,000 miles.Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.

Does high mileage mean more Chevrolet Kalos MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
Chevrolet Kalos: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
15+<40k miles42.7%37.8–47.9%365 (rough estimate)
15+40-70k miles49.2%46.1–52.2%1,019
15+70-100k miles60%56.5–63.4%767
15+100-140k miles62.1%55.2–68.5%203 (rough estimate)

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
1642,59559,41276,425631
1749,49265,22184,055852
1849,61265,08085,745520
1951,62866,22384,656416

A typical 18-year-old Kalos has ~65,080 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Chevrolet Kalos fails its MOT most

Hull area is highest at 69.3%; London SW area is lowest at 34.0% — the gap is 35.3 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Chevrolet Kalos line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75) — 2024 UK MOT data
Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Hull (HU)69.28%+16.2 pp
Edinburgh (EH)67.84%+14.8 pp
Kirkcaldy (KY)67.72%+14.6 pp
Telford (TF)65.69%+12.6 pp
Darlington (DL)65.33%+12.3 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
London SW (SW)33.98%-19.1 pp
Luton (LU)36.4%-16.7 pp
Enfield (EN)39.52%-13.6 pp
Southend-on-Sea (SS)40.43%-12.6 pp
London N (N)41.21%-11.9 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 42%–63% failing.

How many miles does a Chevrolet Kalos last?

100,000+ miles stands out at 9.0%.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

OdometerTests ≥ thresholdShare of sample
100,000+ miles2,5679.03%

Of 28,429 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 9.0% had reached 100k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.

Chevrolet Kalos faults that come together

Road Wheels + Tyres stand out at 3.96×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
Road WheelsTyres343.96× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks7323.35×
BrakesRoad Wheels602.81× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleNoise, emissions and leaks302.81× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment992.7× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleTyres312.67× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems3042.63× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksRoad Wheels202.54× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems212.53× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleVisibility472.5× (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSteering302.44× (rough estimate)
BrakesSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems7482.39×
BrakesNoise, emissions and leaks9582.38×
Body, chassis, structureIdentification of the vehicle372.35× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentRoad Wheels632.33× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksTyres3732.31× (rough estimate)
Road WheelsVisibility312.23× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSuspension8592.22×
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility5792.22×
Identification of the vehicleSuspension792.21× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentNoise, emissions and leaks1,0982.16×
TyresVisibility6132.15×
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsVisibility4292.11× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility1,8542.07×
Body, chassis, structureBrakes1,2272.07×
Body, chassis, structureRoad Wheels242.07× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSteering4722.04× (rough estimate)
BrakesIdentification of the vehicle592.04× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems3452.03× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems8022.02×
Noise, emissions and leaksSuspension9992.01×
Road WheelsSuspension532.01× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSteering331.98× (rough estimate)
BrakesSuspension2,6571.97×
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsTyres2481.97× (rough estimate)
SteeringTyres4911.95× (rough estimate)
SteeringSuspension1,4991.94×
BrakesTyres8381.91×
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSteering3451.91× (rough estimate)
BrakesVisibility1,3481.9×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres1,0501.9×
BrakesLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment2,6161.89×
Body, chassis, structureVisibility7291.89×
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1,4101.88×
SuspensionTyres1,0141.88×
Body, chassis, structureSuspension1,3671.87×
Body, chassis, structureTyres4451.87× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSteering1,4511.83×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension3,0971.82×
BrakesSteering1,1371.81×
Body, chassis, structureSteering6171.81×
SuspensionVisibility1,5321.75×
SteeringVisibility7121.75×
Road WheelsSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems16too few (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSpeedometer and speed limiter6too few (rough estimate)
BrakesSeat belt installation check5too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Body, chassis, structure» and «Noise, emissions and leaks» appear together 3.35× more often than chance (732 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Is low mileage better for a Chevrolet Kalos?

Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 44.9%, against 62.5% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

BandFail %Tests
<5k miles/year44.92%8,907
8–12k miles/year62.51%1,131
Gap (low − normal)-17.59 pp—
By fuel and age

Petrol

AgeLow-use fail %nNormal fail %nGap pp
1140.4182462.74212-22.32 pp
1243.191,99657.73343-14.54 pp
1347.392,72265.34326-17.95 pp
1447.963,36165.2250-17.24 pp

At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 44.9% vs 62.5% for 8–12k miles/year — 17.6 pp lower (n_low=8,907, n_normal=1,131). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates.

Best year for a Chevrolet Kalos, and the years to avoid

Build year 2005 is highest at 102.6; Build year 2007 is lowest at 96.3 — the gap is 6.3 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

build year vs the same model at the same age · 100 = as expected

Chevrolet Kalos build year vs the same model at the same age · 100 = as expected — 2024 UK MOT data
Chevrolet Kalos by build year, tests 2019–2024. Below 100 is better than the model's own age norm.
Every build year with its confidence interval
Build yearvs own age norm95% CIRaw fail %TestsVerdict
200898.795.5–101.952.24%7,023no different
200796.393.7–9951.53%9,833better
200698.194.8–101.453.55%6,398no different
2005102.699–106.156.38%5,576no different

The best build year here is 2007 and the weakest is 2007. Comparing build years sounds simple and is not: within a single year of testing, a car's build year and its age are the same number, so a naive comparison of years is a comparison of ages wearing a disguise. Each year below is measured against the same model at the same age in other cohorts, across six years of testing — 1 of 4 years come out distinguishable from their own model's age norm.

Two limits worth knowing before you act on this. Age, test year and build year are locked together by arithmetic, so the test-year effect is taken from the observed national failure level of each year rather than estimated — it is an adjustment, not a solution.

Chevrolet Kalos MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £185.24 to £351.96, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£185–352
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Suspension40.1 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£72.18
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment43.9 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£61.46
Brakes34.4 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£51.60

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £185 to £352, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Chevrolet Kalos running costs for a fleet

Vehicles failing at age 19 are close to the reference at 55.0%, against 55.0% at age 16, tested in the same year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fails per 100 at age 16
55
vehicles needing work (rough estimate: 631 tests)
At age 19
55
other cars of this model tested at age 19 in 2024 (rough estimate: 416 tests)
Repairs per 100
£18,524
plus £5,485 in test fees
Off the road
1d
median; 33.98% cleared same day
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
AgeFailsMedian odometerTestsGap vs age 5
1654.99%59,412631—
1751.29%65,221852—
1851.92%65,080520—
1955.05%66,223416—

No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).

Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.

Chevrolet Kalos rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility stands out at 4.55×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

How it rusts
4.55×
3.48% of tests record a corrosion defect vs 0.77% typical — age-standardised
Salt Belt exposure
32nd
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 2 postcode areas

This Chevrolet Kalos fails on corrosion far more often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are gentler than most for the models we publish. Those two point in opposite directions, which is the informative case: it rusts more than average despite living in gentler places, so the cause is the car, not the postcode.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Chevrolet Kalos advisory become a failure?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment are highest at 37.2%; Non-component advisories are lowest at 0.0% — the gap is 37.2 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

Chevrolet Kalos chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now — 2024 UK MOT data
Chevrolet Kalos, advisory → failure conversion by component group, chained tests 2019–2024. Chart labels and rates: Lamps & electrical 37.2% · Suspension 29.5% · Steering 29.3% · Brakes 25.6% · Body & chassis 19.5% · Noise, emissions, leaks 10.8% · Tyres 10.7% · Identification of the veh… 3.3%.
Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment37.1%12.1 months3,4221,381
Suspension29.5%12 months3,5506,212
Steering29.3%12 months4,201839
Brakes25.6%12.1 months2,8175,468
Body, chassis, structure19.5%12 months3,4401,434
Noise, emissions and leaks10.8%12.1 months3,8582,643
Tyres10.7%12.1 months3,5305,316
Identification of the vehicle3.3%12 months3,872988
Non-component advisories0.0%——1,439

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 37 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.1 months and roughly 3,422 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Chevrolet Kalos?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 15-19 are highest at 35.3%; Brakes after a passed at age 15-19 are lowest at 13.0% — the gap is 22.4 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
9-11passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 16.3% · Suspension 15.6% · Brakes 13.4%873
9-11advisorySuspension 21.7% · Brakes 18.1% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 18.1%888
9-11failureSuspension 28.2% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 25.0% · Brakes 24.9%1,586
12-14passedSuspension 17.8% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 16.9% · Brakes 13.3%2,638
12-14advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 23.4% · Suspension 22.3% · Brakes 18.0%3,326
12-14failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 30.0% · Suspension 27.6% · Brakes 22.2%6,113
15-19passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 19.2% · Suspension 15.5% · Brakes 13.0%1,080
15-19advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 27.1% · Suspension 23.5% · Brakes 17.5%1,624
15-19failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 35.3% · Suspension 29.3% · Brakes 19.8%2,887

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Chevrolet Kalos ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 62.2%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 3.8% — the gap is 58.4 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
33.98%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
1.376
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
16.63%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
1.092%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 11,030 failures followed through to their re-test, 33.98% were repaired and passed the same day and 62.19% within ten days; the median gap is 1 day. 36,416 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 1.376 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 2,742 miles a year across 6,299 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 16.63% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 44.36% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 1.092% of 6,320 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 8,534 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Chevrolet Kalos safety recalls and how to check yours

DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 1.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

Most recent safety recall campaigns for the Chevrolet Kalos
ReferenceLaunchedVehiclesConcern
R/2012/09028/08/201238,876BRAKING EFFICIENCY MAY BE AFFECTED

DVSA lists 1 safety recall campaigns for the Chevrolet Kalos, covering roughly 38,876 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.

Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.

Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.

Chevrolet Kalos inspection results in other countries

Finland Katsastus stands out at 55.3%, against 26.3% nationally.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Same model, different national inspection regimes
CountryTestThis model failsNational averagePositionSample
United KingdomMOT (class 4)52.96%26.01%+26.9 pp2,430
NetherlandsAPK72.4%50.8%+21.6 pp3,224
FinlandKatsastus55.3%26.3%+29 pp913

The verdict is consistent across every regime where the difference is clear, which is the strongest form this comparison takes: independent inspectorates, different rulebooks, same direction of travel.

What Finland fails it for — share of recorded faults
Fault areaShare
Axles, wheels and suspension27.1%
Brake systems24.8%
Chassis and body21.6%
Environmental hazards12.3%
Steering equipment7%

Useful as a cross-check on the UK defect table above: the categories are named differently, but a component that dominates in both regimes is a genuine weak point of the model rather than an artefact of one country's testing style.

The exact faults Netherlands records — APK defect codes, 2024
CodeFaultRecordedType
210Tyre pressure not at the correct value581failure
205Tyre with insufficient tread464failure
RA2Excessive leak of other fluids373advisory
522Dipped-beam cut-off line unclear341failure
516Dipped headlight incorrectly aimed307failure
RA6Waarschuwingsinrichting antiblokkeersysteem geeft defect aan277advisory
289Schijf-, trommelrem loopt niet vrij273failure
391Wipers leave insufficient visibility271failure

Worth dwelling on how mundane the top of that list is: tyre pressure, tread depth, headlight aim. The Dutch APK records 2.147 defects per inspection against a much higher national failure rate than Britain's, and the reason is not that Dutch cars are worse — it is that the two regimes draw the line between "note it" and "fail it" in different places. Codes are the RDW's own; the English wording here is our translation of the Dutch original.

Britain is not the only country that inspects every car every year, and the Chevrolet Kalos is on the road in all of them. Each national regime writes its own rules, so the pass rates below are not comparable to each other — what does travel across a border is whether a model sits above or below its own country's average.

Rows with fewer than 500 inspections are not published. Sources: RDW open data — Meldingen Keuringsinstantie + Geconstateerde Gebreken + Gekentekende voertuigen (2024), CC0. Not an RDW endorsement.; Traficom — Periodic inspections of cars by model / by model and fault object 2024, CC BY 4.0. Adapted; licences and full notice.

Chevrolet Kalos MOT: quick answers

Chevrolet Kalos MOT Risk Index stands out at 122.3, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Chevrolet Kalos first-time MOT pass rate?
47.04% of first attempts passed in 2024 (2,430 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 52.96% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 2,430 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 122.3 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Chevrolet Kalos with other cars

Mazda 5 is highest at 122.4; Fiat 500e is lowest at 122.1 — the gap is 0.3 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Chevrolet MOT statisticsChevrolet Spark MOT statsChevrolet Lacetti MOT stats

Similar risk

Mazda 5 (index 122.4)Fiat 500e (index 122.1)Renault Scenic (index 122.1)

Same size class

how Audi S4 compareshow TVR Chimaera compareshow Nissan Figaro compares

By build year

Chevrolet Kalos 2005Chevrolet Kalos 2006Chevrolet Kalos 2007Chevrolet Kalos 2008

By area

Chevrolet Kalos MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Chevrolet Kalos body, chassis and structure failuresChevrolet Kalos brakes failuresChevrolet Kalos vehicle identification failuresChevrolet Kalos lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresChevrolet Kalos noise, emissions and leaks failuresChevrolet Kalos road wheels failuresChevrolet Kalos seat belts and airbags failuresChevrolet Kalos steering failuresChevrolet Kalos suspension failuresChevrolet Kalos tyres failuresChevrolet Kalos visibility failures

Inspections abroad

Chevrolet Kalos in FinlandChevrolet Kalos in the Netherlands


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:chevrolet-kalos:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Chevrolet Kalos MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/chevrolet-kalos/ · Published 2026-07-30.