MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Volvo XC90 2016: MOT failure rate for its age

17.3% of 31,704 MOT tests of the Volvo XC90 first registered in 2016 failed at the first attempt (2019–2024; retests excluded). Against this model's own normal rate at the same ages the index is 98.3 (95% CI 95.7–100.9; 100 = normal for this model at that age): the 2016 build year is no different from other years of the same model at the same age.

Volvo XC90 built in 2016 at a glance
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Failed first time17.3%all ages tested2019–202431704
Index against this model at the same age (95% CI 95.7–100.9)98.3index100 = normal for this model at that age2019–202431704
Rank among this model's 18 build years6of 181 = fails least for its age2019–202431704
Tested in 20245217testsmedian 79,959 miles20245217
line · Volvo XC90 built 2016 · first-time MOT failure share by age · built 2016 12.7% vs model normal 13.1% at age 3 · 2019–2024
Built 2016 against Volvo XC90 normal for the age: first-time MOT failure share at each age, age 3: 12.7% vs 13.1%; age 4: 13.8% vs 13.8%; age 5: 16.7% vs 15.3%; age 6: 19.5% vs 17.8%; age 7: 20% vs 20.5%; age 8: 21.4% vs 25.3%. Axis from 0% to 30%. DVSA MOT bulk data, 2019–2024.

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · page updated 30 Sep 2026 · full dataset (v5).

How does the 2016 Volvo XC90 fail at each age?

Cars built in 2016 were tested at ages 3 to 8 between 2019 and 2024. Each row compares their first-time failure share with what this model normally shows at that age, after allowing for the overall failure level of each test year.

Volvo XC90 built 2016: first-time MOT failure by age, against the model's normal rate at that age (2019–2024)
AgeTestsFailed, %95% intervalNormal for this model at that age, %Index (100 = normal)
35,50712.711.8–13.613.197
45,18113.812.9–14.813.8100.1
55,30316.715.7–17.715.3108.7
65,26619.518.5–20.617.8110
75,2302018.9–21.120.597.4
85,21721.420.3–22.525.384.3

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 31,704 (initial tests) · Method: normal rate = this model's first-time failure share at that age across its build years (cells of 400+ tests), adjusted for each test year's overall level; cells of 30+ tests, under 500 marked rough · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What fails most on the 2016 Volvo XC90?

The most common failure group on cars built in 2016 is tyres: 7.9 items per 100 first tests, against 9 across all build years of the Volvo XC90. These counts are not age-adjusted: cars built in 2016 were tested at ages 3 to 8.

Failure items per 100 first tests, Volvo XC90 built 2016 against the Volvo XC90 in all build years (2019–2024, not age-adjusted)
Failure groupBuilt 2016, per 100All build years, per 100Items
Tyres7.992,498
Visibility5.26.91,646
Brakes4.918.11,540
Suspension4.810.21,534
Steering4.23.21,345

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 31,704 (initial tests of this build year) · Method: failure items grouped by DVSA's top-level defect groups, per 100 initial tests; groups with 30+ items · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does 2016 compare with the years around it?

Among the 18 published build years of the Volvo XC90, 2016 ranks 6 (1 = fails least for its age). 2015: index 90.7. 2017: index 90.4.

Volvo XC90 build years: index against the model at the same age (2019–2024)
Build yearIndex (100 = normal)95% intervalVerdictTests
2003105.0101.7–108.3worse8,072
2004103.0101.0–105.0worse21,276
2005101.899.9–103.6no different25,671
200699.797.6–101.8no different20,028
2007102.7100.4–104.9worse18,738
200899.096.0–101.9no different11,080
200999.497.2–101.5no different21,390
2010102.7101.0–104.4worse37,448
2011106.3104.1–108.4worse26,142
201293.791.1–96.2better17,902
201395.892.8–98.8better14,572
2014101.197.7–104.5no different13,824
201590.787.5–93.9better16,349
201698.395.7–100.9no different31,704
201790.487.6–93.2better29,290
201894.791.5–97.9better25,312
2019102.598.8–106.2no different21,896
2020101.495.8–107.0no different9,929

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 370,623 (initial tests) · Method: observed failures against those expected for the same model at the same ages, test-year level adjusted; verdict follows the printed one-decimal bound · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Volvo XC90 2016 MOT statistics (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 30 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/volvo-xc90/2016/

How every figure is calculated: methodology. Age, test year and build year are tied together (age = test year − build year), so the test-year level is taken as observed, not estimated.

Other pages for this model

Volvo XC90 2003 · Volvo XC90 2004 · Volvo XC90 2005 · Volvo XC90 2006 · Volvo XC90 2007 · Volvo XC90 2008 · Volvo XC90 2009 · Volvo XC90 2010 · Volvo XC90 2011 · Volvo XC90 2012 · Volvo XC90 2013 · Volvo XC90 2014 · Volvo XC90 2015 · Volvo XC90 2017 · Volvo XC90 2018 · Volvo XC90 2019 · Volvo XC90 2020 · Volvo XC90 in Norway · Volvo XC90 in Finland · Volvo XC90 in the Netherlands · Volvo XC90 by postcode area · Volvo XC90 body, chassis and structure failures · Volvo XC90 brakes failures · Volvo XC90 vehicle identification failures · Volvo XC90 lamps, reflectors and electrics failures · Volvo XC90 noise, emissions and leaks failures · Volvo XC90 road wheels failures · Volvo XC90 seat belts and airbags failures · Volvo XC90 steering failures · Volvo XC90 suspension failures · Volvo XC90 tyres failures · Volvo XC90 visibility failures