MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Suzuki Swift 2016: MOT failure rate for its age

16.8% of 63,681 MOT tests of the Suzuki Swift first registered in 2016 failed at the first attempt (2019–2024; retests excluded). Against this model's own normal rate at the same ages the index is 103.1 (95% CI 101.1–105.0; 100 = normal for this model at that age): close to other build years of the same model at the same age (within 5 points of normal).

Suzuki Swift built in 2016 at a glance
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Failed first time16.8%all ages tested2019–202463681
Index against this model at the same age (95% CI 101.1–105.0)103.1index100 = normal for this model at that age2019–202463681
Rank among this model's 19 build years14of 191 = fails least for its age2019–202463681
Tested in 202410491testsmedian 49,039 miles202410491
line · Suzuki Swift built 2016 · first-time MOT failure share by age · built 2016 11.7% vs model normal 10% at age 3 · 2019–2024
Built 2016 against Suzuki Swift normal for the age: first-time MOT failure share at each age, age 3: 11.7% vs 10%; age 4: 15.6% vs 13.4%; age 5: 16.7% vs 15.9%; age 6: 16.4% vs 16.7%; age 7: 19.8% vs 19.6%; age 8: 21.1% vs 22.5%. Axis from 0% to 30%. DVSA MOT bulk data, 2019–2024.

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · page updated 30 Sep 2026 · full dataset (v5).

How does the 2016 Suzuki Swift fail at each age?

Cars built in 2016 were tested at ages 3 to 8 between 2019 and 2024. Each row compares their first-time failure share with what this model normally shows at that age, after allowing for the overall failure level of each test year.

Suzuki Swift built 2016: first-time MOT failure by age, against the model's normal rate at that age (2019–2024)
AgeTestsFailed, %95% intervalNormal for this model at that age, %Index (100 = normal)
311,05411.711.1–12.310116.5
410,47115.614.9–16.313.4116.2
510,59616.716–17.415.9104.6
610,55116.415.7–17.116.798
710,51819.819.1–20.619.6100.9
810,49121.120.3–21.922.593.5

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 63,681 (initial tests) · Method: normal rate = this model's first-time failure share at that age across its build years (cells of 400+ tests), adjusted for each test year's overall level; cells of 30+ tests, under 500 marked rough · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What fails most on the 2016 Suzuki Swift?

The most common failure group on cars built in 2016 is brakes: 6 items per 100 first tests, against 18.5 across all build years of the Suzuki Swift. These counts are not age-adjusted: cars built in 2016 were tested at ages 3 to 8.

Failure items per 100 first tests, Suzuki Swift built 2016 against the Suzuki Swift in all build years (2019–2024, not age-adjusted)
Failure groupBuilt 2016, per 100All build years, per 100Items
Brakes618.53,798
Visibility5.99.13,771
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment5.414.83,450
Tyres5.27.33,302
Suspension2.716.21,749

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 63,681 (initial tests of this build year) · Method: failure items grouped by DVSA's top-level defect groups, per 100 initial tests; groups with 30+ items · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does 2016 compare with the years around it?

Among the 19 published build years of the Suzuki Swift, 2016 ranks 14 (1 = fails least for its age). 2015: index 97.4. 2017: index 94.1.

Suzuki Swift build years: index against the model at the same age (2019–2024)
Build yearIndex (100 = normal)95% intervalVerdictTests
200189.379.2–99.5better (rough estimate)627
200293.987.7–100.0no different (rough estimate)1,825
200390.781.4–100.1no different (rough estimate)778
2005104.0101.5–106.6worse12,644
2006103.3101.7–104.8worse35,040
2007102.1100.9–103.3worse56,923
2008106.1104.8–107.4worse55,082
2009106.0104.6–107.4worse48,494
2010104.9103.2–106.5worse40,028
201196.594.9–98.2better39,423
201295.093.5–96.5better55,714
201396.194.5–97.7better53,423
201496.094.3–97.6better61,127
201597.495.8–99.0better75,054
2016103.1101.1–105.0worse63,681
201794.191.7–96.5better42,277
201897.695.0–100.2no different41,234
201990.387.4–93.2better33,528
202085.180.8–89.4better16,184

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 733,086 (initial tests) · Method: observed failures against those expected for the same model at the same ages, test-year level adjusted; verdict follows the printed one-decimal bound · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Suzuki Swift 2016 MOT statistics (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 30 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/suzuki-swift/2016/

How every figure is calculated: methodology. Age, test year and build year are tied together (age = test year − build year), so the test-year level is taken as observed, not estimated.

Other pages for this model

Suzuki Swift 2001 · Suzuki Swift 2002 · Suzuki Swift 2003 · Suzuki Swift 2005 · Suzuki Swift 2006 · Suzuki Swift 2007 · Suzuki Swift 2008 · Suzuki Swift 2009 · Suzuki Swift 2010 · Suzuki Swift 2011 · Suzuki Swift 2012 · Suzuki Swift 2013 · Suzuki Swift 2014 · Suzuki Swift 2015 · Suzuki Swift 2017 · Suzuki Swift 2018 · Suzuki Swift 2019 · Suzuki Swift 2020 · Suzuki Swift in Norway · Suzuki Swift in Finland · Suzuki Swift in the Netherlands · Suzuki Swift by postcode area · Suzuki Swift body, chassis and structure failures · Suzuki Swift brakes failures · Suzuki Swift vehicle identification failures · Suzuki Swift lamps, reflectors and electrics failures · Suzuki Swift noise, emissions and leaks failures · Suzuki Swift road wheels failures · Suzuki Swift seat belts and airbags failures · Suzuki Swift steering failures · Suzuki Swift suspension failures · Suzuki Swift tyres failures · Suzuki Swift visibility failures