MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Smart City-Coupe 2008: MOT failure rate for its age

33.3% of 573 MOT tests of the Smart City-Coupe first registered in 2008 failed at the first attempt (2019–2024; retests excluded). Against this model's own normal rate at the same ages the index is 78.2 (95% CI 67.2–89.3; 100 = normal for this model at that age): the 2008 Smart City-Coupe fails less often than other build years of the same model at the same age. This is a rough estimate from a smaller sample.

Smart City-Coupe built in 2008 at a glance
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Failed first time33.3%all ages tested2019–2024573
Index against this model at the same age (95% CI 67.2–89.3)78.2index100 = normal for this model at that age2019–2024573
Rank among this model's 11 build years1of 111 = fails least for its age2019–2024573
Tested in 2024102testsmedian 63,891 miles2024102
line · Smart City-Coupe built 2008 · first-time MOT failure share by age · built 2008 41.3% vs model normal n/a% at age 11 · 2019–2024
Built 2008 against Smart City-Coupe normal for the age: first-time MOT failure share at each age, age 11: 41.3% vs n/a%; age 12: 23.5% vs 44.1%; age 13: 32.5% vs 44.1%; age 14: 33.3% vs 41.9%; age 15: 42.9% vs 42%; age 16: 34.3% vs 40.8%. Axis from 0% to 50%. DVSA MOT bulk data, 2019–2024.

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · page updated 30 Sep 2026 · full dataset (v5).

How does the 2008 Smart City-Coupe fail at each age?

Cars built in 2008 were tested at ages 11 to 16 between 2019 and 2024. Each row compares their first-time failure share with what this model normally shows at that age, after allowing for the overall failure level of each test year.

Smart City-Coupe built 2008: first-time MOT failure by age, against the model's normal rate at that age (2019–2024)
AgeTestsFailed, %95% intervalNormal for this model at that age, %Index (100 = normal)
11126 (rough estimate)41.333.1–50not availablenot available
12115 (rough estimate)23.516.7–3244.153.3
13120 (rough estimate)32.524.8–41.344.173.7
14117 (rough estimate)33.325.4–42.341.979.6
15119 (rough estimate)42.934.3–51.842102.1
16102 (rough estimate)34.325.8–43.940.884.2

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 699 (initial tests) · Method: normal rate = this model's first-time failure share at that age across its build years (cells of 400+ tests), adjusted for each test year's overall level; cells of 30+ tests, under 500 marked rough · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What fails most on the 2008 Smart City-Coupe?

The most common failure group on cars built in 2008 is lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment: 22 items per 100 first tests, against 44.5 across all build years of the Smart City-Coupe. These counts are not age-adjusted: cars built in 2008 were tested at ages 11 to 16.

Failure items per 100 first tests, Smart City-Coupe built 2008 against the Smart City-Coupe in all build years (2019–2024, not age-adjusted)
Failure groupBuilt 2008, per 100All build years, per 100Items
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment2244.5154
Suspension14.621.4102
Brakes11.416.180
Visibility9.414.566
Tyres6.78.847

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 699 (initial tests of this build year) · Method: failure items grouped by DVSA's top-level defect groups, per 100 initial tests; groups with 30+ items · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does 2008 compare with the years around it?

Among the 11 published build years of the Smart City-Coupe, 2008 ranks 1 (1 = fails least for its age). 2007: index 101.0. 2009: index 82.6.

Smart City-Coupe build years: index against the model at the same age (2019–2024)
Build yearIndex (100 = normal)95% intervalVerdictTests
200098.885.9–111.7no different (rough estimate)530
200198.791.3–106.2no different (rough estimate)1,588
200299.996.3–103.5no different7,014
200399.796.6–102.7no different9,682
200497.093.5–100.5no different7,221
200597.993.3–102.5no different4,096
200699.294.8–103.5no different4,700
2007101.095.9–106.0no different (rough estimate)3,510
200878.267.2–89.3better (rough estimate)573
200982.670.7–94.5better (rough estimate)529
201081.064.7–97.3better (rough estimate)277

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 39,720 (initial tests) · Method: observed failures against those expected for the same model at the same ages, test-year level adjusted; verdict follows the printed one-decimal bound · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Smart City-Coupe 2008 MOT statistics (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 30 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/smart-city-review-c3a2a143/2008/

How every figure is calculated: methodology. Age, test year and build year are tied together (age = test year − build year), so the test-year level is taken as observed, not estimated.

Other pages for this model

Smart City-Coupe 2000 · Smart City-Coupe 2001 · Smart City-Coupe 2002 · Smart City-Coupe 2003 · Smart City-Coupe 2004 · Smart City-Coupe 2005 · Smart City-Coupe 2006 · Smart City-Coupe 2007 · Smart City-Coupe 2009 · Smart City-Coupe 2010 · Smart City-Coupe by postcode area · Smart City-Coupe body, chassis and structure failures · Smart City-Coupe brakes failures · Smart City-Coupe vehicle identification failures · Smart City-Coupe lamps, reflectors and electrics failures · Smart City-Coupe noise, emissions and leaks failures · Smart City-Coupe road wheels failures · Smart City-Coupe seat belts and airbags failures · Smart City-Coupe steering failures · Smart City-Coupe suspension failures · Smart City-Coupe tyres failures · Smart City-Coupe visibility failures