Peugeot E7 — MOT statistics 2024
The Peugeot E7 failed 39.22% of 1,173 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 138.6 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 39% more often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.
Age-adjusted peer: Fiat Fiorino (index 138.1) — the two published results are 0.5 index points apart.
Peugeot E7 common problems: what actually fails the MOT
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment stand out at 29.8 per 100 tests, against 10.0 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.
Component-group comparison table
Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone, and 1 of these is already inside an interval that includes 1.00×.
| Group | This family | Cases behind it | UK, same ages | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamps & electrical | 29.8 | 1,882 | 10.0 | 2.99×2.86–3.13 |
| Suspension | 21.5 | 1,362 | 9.1 | 2.37×2.25–2.50 |
| Brakes | 20.8 | 1,314 | 7.5 | 2.77×2.62–2.92 |
| Body & structure | 17.3 | 1,093 | 2.5 | 7.06×6.64–7.49 |
| Emissions & leaks | 10.7 | 678 | 2.0 | 5.35×4.97–5.78 |
| Visibility | 6.3 | 396 | 6.3 | 0.99×0.89–1.09 · not distinguishable |
| What failed | per 100 tests (this family) | per 100 tests (UK average) | ratio family / UK | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot…A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | 7.05 | 1.56 | 4.53× | Ask the seller about: A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or |
| Parking brake efficiency below minimum requirementParking brake efficiency below minimum requirement | 5.69 | 1.24 | 4.59× | Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive |
| Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | 8.84 | 4.87 | 1.82× | Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test |
| Transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot…A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely deteriorated | 5.22 | 1.48 | 3.53× | Ask the seller about: A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely d |
| Smoke opacity levels exceed the manufacturer's…Smoke opacity levels exceed the manufacturer's specified limit | 3.31 | 0.29 | 11.53× | Ask the seller about: Smoke opacity levels exceed the manufacturer's specified lim |
| Lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a…A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | 4.81 | 2.09 | 2.30× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | 4.90 | 2.57 | 1.91× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Rear registration plate lamp or light source…A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources | 4.79 | 2.83 | 1.69× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Spring or spring component fractured or seriously…A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened | 4.52 | 2.86 | 1.58× | Ask the seller about: A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened |
| Suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer…A suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | 2.93 | 1.78 | 1.64× | Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test |
Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.
Peugeot E7 MOT advisories: what gets flagged
Brakes are highest at 21.2 per 100 tests; Body & structure are lowest at 4.4 per 100 tests — the gap is 16.8 per 100 tests.
higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests
Advisory rates table
| Group | Advisories per 100 |
|---|---|
| Brakes | 21.2 |
| Tyres | 19.2 |
| Suspension | 11.3 |
| Emissions & leaks | 11.3 |
| Non-component advisories | 4.9 |
| Body & structure | 4.4 |
Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.
Tyres, brakes and suspension: Peugeot E7 against cars of the same age
| Age | Part | Peugeot E7 | Same age, petrol and diesel | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 years | Tyres | 4.89 | 5.54 | -0.65 |
| 6 years | Brakes | 12.22 | 3.81 | 8.41 |
| 6 years | Suspension | 13.97 | 3.72 | 10.25 |
| 7 years | Tyres | 4.21 | 5.95 | -1.74 |
| 7 years | Brakes | 11.3 | 4.55 | 6.75 |
| 7 years | Suspension | 16.09 | 5.68 | 10.41 |
| 8 years | Tyres | 4.38 | 6.31 | -1.93 |
| 8 years | Brakes | 12.24 | 5.38 | 6.86 |
| 8 years | Suspension | 14.89 | 7.78 | 7.11 |
Failing items per 100 initial tests, 2019-2024. The comparison group is every petrol or diesel car tested at the same age, so weight and drivetrain show up rather than fleet age.
If a car like this fails, does it fail again?
A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.
| After this year's test | Fails next year | Vehicles followed |
|---|---|---|
| It failed | 37.5% | 421 |
| It passed | 33.0% | 3,119 |
A failed test does not clearly change next year's odds here (37.5% against 33.0%): the difference is within the margin of error. The failure most likely to come back is body, chassis, structure — 43.1% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.
Adjusted for how much these are actually driven
The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 6,264 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.
| Standardised for | Index | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Age only | 153.0 | fails more often than expected |
| Age and annual mileage | 116.7 | fails more often than vehicles driven as much |
| Share doing under 3,000 miles a year | 0.0% | a normal spread of use |
Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 36.3 points — this fleet works harder than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view penalises it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.
How the Peugeot E7 compares with cars of its own age and size
Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.
| Age | Peugeot E7 | Same class, same age | Difference | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 years | 27.36% | 11.69% | +15.67 pp | 296 |
| 4 years | 29.91% | 13.29% | +16.62 pp | 438 |
| 5 years | 31.7% | 15.06% | +16.63 pp | 631 |
| 6 years | 36.9% | 17.33% | +19.57 pp | 859 |
| 7 years | 39.08% | 20.14% | +18.94 pp | 1,044 |
| 8 years | 40.09% | 23.21% | +16.88 pp | 1,095 |
| 9 years | 43.38% | 26.73% | +16.65 pp | 770 |
| 10 years | 41.73% | 30.03% | +11.7 pp | 544 |
| 11 years | 39.53% | 33.45% | +6.08 pp | 339 |
Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.
How does the Peugeot E7 perform as it gets older?
The E7 at age 9 stands out at 42.4%, against 26.5% for all vehicles of the same age.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–46%.
Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.
Data table
| Age | Peugeot E7 | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 38.2% | 23.3% | +14.9 pp |
| 9 | 42.4% | 26.5% | +15.8 pp |
| 10 | 35.4% | 30.1% | +5.2 pp |
| 11 | 37.1% | 33.2% | +3.9 pp |
Is a Peugeot E7 ULEZ compliant?
The share of classifiable 2024 Peugeot E7 MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 41.6%.
Based on 1,165 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.
higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class
| Vehicle age at test | Likely ULEZ-compliant share | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| Under 3 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 3–5 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 1 |
| 6–7 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 49 |
| 8 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 327 |
| 9 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 255 |
| 10–14 years | 0.0% Check a registration with TfL | n = 520 |
| 15–17 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 7 |
| 18 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 1 |
| 19 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 20+ years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 5 |
How dangerous are Peugeot E7 MOT failures?
Major defects stand out at 90.7 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
Severity table
| Severity | This family /100 | National /100 | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minor | 18.51 | 14.22 | 1.30× |
| Major | 90.68 | 52.75 | 1.72× |
| Dangerous | 8.84 | 11.15 | 0.79× |
Chart values: Minor 18.5 · Major 90.7 · Dangerous 8.8.
Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.
Does the month of a Peugeot E7 MOT matter?
Nov is highest at 42.2%; Sep is lowest at 32.2% — the gap is 10.0 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart scale: 27%–44%.
bars: Peugeot E7 · dashed: all class-4 cars
Month-by-month table
| Month | Peugeot E7 | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 40.45% | 31.12% | +9.3 pp |
| Feb | 35.92% | 29.99% | +5.9 pp |
| Mar | 38.34% | 28.26% | +10.1 pp |
| Apr | 38.58% | 29.78% | +8.8 pp |
| May | 41.61% | 28.79% | +12.8 pp |
| Jun | 38.4% | 28.15% | +10.3 pp |
| Jul | 34.26% | 29.33% | +4.9 pp |
| Aug | 40.04% | 29.2% | +10.8 pp |
| Sep | 32.23% | 28.19% | +4.0 pp |
| Oct | 36.34% | 30.34% | +6.0 pp |
| Nov | 42.21% | 30.58% | +11.6 pp |
| Dec | 37.76% | 29.33% | +8.4 pp |
Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 10.0 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.
Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.
Peugeot E7 average mileage by age
At age 8, the middle half of E7s runs from 169,876 miles to 261,962 miles, against 217,189 miles as the median.
further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75
Chart axes: car age, years · odometer scale 0–349k mi.
line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)
Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
| Age | p25 | Median | p75 | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 169,876 | 217,189 | 261,962 | 327 |
| 9 | 196,097 | 234,227 | 285,905 | 255 |
| 10 | 218,857 | 261,562 | 315,182 | 215 |
| 11 | 226,861 | 280,287 | 332,434 | 186 |
| 12 | 225,827 | 288,364 | 332,751 | 88 |
A typical 8-year-old E7 has ~217,189 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.
Where in Britain the Peugeot E7 fails its MOT most
Brighton area is highest at 59.1%; Liverpool area is lowest at 20.3% — the gap is 38.8 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Toughest areas | % failing | vs model overall |
|---|---|---|
| Brighton (BN) | 59.09% | +21.1 pp |
| Northampton (NN) | 57.76% | +19.8 pp |
| Chester (CH) | 51.49% | +13.5 pp |
| Birmingham (B) | 48.48% | +10.5 pp |
| Edinburgh (EH) | 46.94% | +9.0 pp |
| Easiest areas | % failing | vs model overall |
|---|---|---|
| Liverpool (L) | 20.29% | -17.7 pp |
| Guildford (GU) | 26.62% | -11.3 pp |
| Glasgow (G) | 28% | -10.0 pp |
Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.
Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 20%–51% failing.
Peugeot E7 survival: which cars are still on the road
By age 12 is well below the reference at 17.3%, against 100.0% at the ages 4–6 reference level.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart axes: car age, years · survival vs ages 4–6 · scale 0–105%.
Survival vs fail rate by age
| Age | Tests | Survival vs ages 4–6 | Fail % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 296 | 39.7% | 27.36% |
| 4 | 438 | 58.8% | 29.91% |
| 5 | 631 | 84.7% | 31.7% |
| 6 | 859 | 100% | 36.9% |
| 7 | 1,044 | 100% | 39.08% |
| 8 | 1,095 | 100% | 40.09% |
| 9 | 770 | 100% | 43.38% |
| 10 | 544 | 73% | 41.73% |
| 11 | 339 | 45.5% | 39.53% |
| 12 | 129 | 17.3% | 44.19% |
By age 10, only about 73% as many cars of this family present for MOT as at ages 4–6 (reference n≈745); survivors still fail at 41.7% vs 31.7% at age 5. Older cars that still appear are a selected subset — weaker ones have already left.
How many miles does a Peugeot E7 last?
100,000+ miles is highest at 90.4%; 200,000+ miles is lowest at 50.4% — the gap is 39.9 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Odometer | Tests ≥ threshold | Share of sample |
|---|---|---|
| 100,000+ miles | 5,670 | 90.37% |
| 150,000+ miles | 4,661 | 74.29% |
| 200,000+ miles | 3,164 | 50.43% |
Of 6,274 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 90.4% had reached 100k miles, 74.3% had reached 150k miles, 50.4% had reached 200k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.
How many years is a Peugeot E7 likely to last?
Bought at age 5 is highest at 6.1 years; Bought at age 10 is lowest at 0.5 years — the gap is 5.6 years.
bigger number = longer remaining lifeyears on the observed survival curve
| Age now | Typical mileage (p50) | Expected years left |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | — | at least 6.1 |
| 8 | — | at least 2.2 |
| 10 | — | at least 0.5 |
estimateEstimate only — not a warranty: a typical 10-year-old example of this family has at least 0.5 expected years of further MOT-present life. The curve is observed only until age 10, so the true figure is likely higher.
Peugeot E7 faults that come together
Brakes + Steering stand out at 3.35×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.
above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less
| Group A | Group B | Together | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brakes | Steering | 89 | 3.35× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Tyres | 164 | 3.22× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Road Wheels | 24 | 3.18× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 29 | 3.03× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 20 | 3.01× (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Suspension | 92 | 2.93× (rough estimate) |
| Tyres | Visibility | 45 | 2.88× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Steering | 80 | 2.87× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 393 | 2.81× (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Tyres | 27 | 2.79× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Tyres | 99 | 2.71× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 36 | 2.7× (rough estimate) |
| Suspension | Tyres | 116 | 2.69× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Noise, emissions and leaks | 186 | 2.68× (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Visibility | 30 | 2.64× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Suspension | 309 | 2.61× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Steering | 96 | 2.59× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 26 | 2.59× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Visibility | 153 | 2.56× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Noise, emissions and leaks | 247 | 2.55× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Suspension | 418 | 2.53× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Visibility | 75 | 2.52× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Suspension | 311 | 2.5× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Tyres | 93 | 2.43× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 354 | 2.41× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Brakes | 254 | 2.41× (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Suspension | 27 | 2.39× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Visibility | 101 | 2.35× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Steering | 43 | 2.33× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Suspension | 183 | 2.23× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Visibility | 99 | 2.2× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Tyres | 55 | 2.17× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Noise, emissions and leaks | 151 | 2.07× (rough estimate) |
| Suspension | Visibility | 97 | 1.91× (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Suspension | 19 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Road Wheels | 17 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Road Wheels | 16 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Suspension | 12 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Visibility | 12 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 11 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Tyres | 11 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Road Wheels | 11 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Noise, emissions and leaks | 8 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Steering | 8 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Identification of the vehicle | 6 | too few (rough estimate) |
Defects in «Brakes» and «Steering» appear together 3.35× more often than chance (89 co-occurrences in the same test; 66 pairs compared).
Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).
Peugeot E7 MOT repair costs
The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £133.02 to £252.74, against £54.85 for the test itself.
bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only
| Component | Fails per 100 tests | Typical repair | Its price | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 29.8 (nat. 18.09) | Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid) | £140 | £41.72 |
| Suspension | 21.5 (nat. 15.36) | Suspension coil spring (single corner) | £180 | £38.70 |
| Brakes | 20.8 (nat. 11.25) | Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback) | £150 | £31.20 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 10.7 (nat. 3.67) | Exhaust rear silencer | £200 | £21.40 |
Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £133 to £253, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.
Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.
For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.
Peugeot E7 running costs for a fleet
Vehicles failing at age 10 are well below the reference at 35.0%, against 38.0% at age 8, tested in the same year.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
| Age | Fails | Median odometer | Tests | Gap vs age 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 38.23% | 217,189 | 327 | — |
| 9 | 42.35% | 234,227 | 255 | — |
| 10 | 35.35% | 261,562 | 215 | — |
| 11 | 37.1% | 280,287 | 186 | — |
No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).
Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.
Peugeot E7 rust problems: where they corrode
Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility stands out at 1.36×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.
above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less
This Peugeot E7 fails on corrosion more often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are saltier than most for the models we publish.
Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.
Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.
Does a Peugeot E7 advisory become a failure?
Brakes are highest at 16.8%; Tyres are lowest at 6.5% — the gap is 10.3 percentage points.
higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability
chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now
| Component | Fails next time | Typical lead time | Miles of warning | Advisories tracked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brakes | 16.8% | 11.9 months | 16,996 | 721 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 14.4% | 11.8 months | 15,960 | 543 |
| Tyres | 6.5% | 11.8 months | 18,056 | 720 |
This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.
Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 17 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 11.9 months and roughly 16,996 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.
What will fail next on a Peugeot E7?
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age <3 are highest at 28.6%; Suspension after a passed at age <3 is lowest at 7.2% — the gap is 21.4 percentage points.
higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability
| Age | Last test | Most likely next failures | Cars tracked |
|---|---|---|---|
| <3 | passed | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 18.9% · Brakes 10.8% · Suspension 7.2% | 111 (rough estimate) |
| <3 | failure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 28.6% · Suspension 14.3% · Body, chassis, structure 12.2% | 49 (rough estimate) |
| 3-5 | passed | Body, chassis, structure 11.3% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 11.0% · Brakes 9.5% | 821 |
| 3-5 | advisory | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 20.5% · Body, chassis, structure 15.0% · Brakes 14.0% | 293 (rough estimate) |
| 3-5 | failure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 21.4% · Suspension 17.1% · Brakes 15.5% | 510 |
| 6-8 | passed | Suspension 13.5% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 12.6% · Body, chassis, structure 11.5% | 1,085 |
| 6-8 | advisory | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 19.8% · Suspension 17.1% · Body, chassis, structure 12.1% | 455 (rough estimate) |
| 6-8 | failure | Suspension 23.3% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 22.5% · Body, chassis, structure 16.8% | 1,034 |
| 9-11 | passed | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 15.1% · Suspension 14.8% · Body, chassis, structure 10.4% | 298 (rough estimate) |
| 9-11 | advisory | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 18.8% · Suspension 18.8% · Body, chassis, structure 17.4% | 149 (rough estimate) |
| 9-11 | failure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 23.8% · Suspension 21.5% · Brakes 19.8% | 344 (rough estimate) |
The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.
The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.
Peugeot E7 ownership: what six years of MOTs show
The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 66.3%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 5.0% — the gap is 61.3 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 1,831 failures followed through to their re-test, 28.67% were repaired and passed the same day and 66.3% within ten days; the median gap is 1 day. 5,768 defect items were cleared in the process.
Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.191 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 20,495 miles a year across 1,051 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.
Two populations hide inside one model. 52.79% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 20.56% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.
Odometer anomalies: 9.411% of 1,052 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 115,918 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.
Peugeot E7 MOT: quick answers
Peugeot E7 MOT Risk Index stands out at 138.6, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
- What is the Peugeot E7 first-time MOT pass rate?
- 60.78% of first attempts passed in 2024 (1,173 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
- Why does this number differ from other sites?
- Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 39.22% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 1,173 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 138.6 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.
Compare the Peugeot E7 with other cars
Citroen Spacetourer is highest at 139.2; Great Wall Steed is lowest at 138.0 — the gap is 1.2 points.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
Same brand
All Peugeot MOT statisticsPeugeot Traveller MOT statsPeugeot Rifter MOT stats
Similar risk
Fiat Fiorino (index 138.1)Citroen Spacetourer (index 139.2)Great Wall Steed (index 138.0)
Same size class
how Vauxhall Ampera compareshow Fiat Sedici compareshow Great Wall Steed compares
By area
Peugeot E7 MOT failure rate by postcode area
By failure group
Peugeot E7 body, chassis and structure failuresPeugeot E7 brakes failuresPeugeot E7 lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresPeugeot E7 noise, emissions and leaks failuresPeugeot E7 road wheels failuresPeugeot E7 seat belts and airbags failuresPeugeot E7 steering failuresPeugeot E7 suspension failuresPeugeot E7 tyres failuresPeugeot E7 visibility failures
Data details & how to cite
Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:peugeot-e7:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.
Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Peugeot E7 MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/peugeot-e7/ · Published 2026-07-30.