MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Mercedes-Benz B-Class 2010: MOT failure rate for its age

36.7% of 28,176 MOT tests of the Mercedes-Benz B-Class first registered in 2010 failed at the first attempt (2019–2024; retests excluded). Against this model's own normal rate at the same ages the index is 106.7 (95% CI 104.7–108.8; 100 = normal for this model at that age): the 2010 Mercedes-Benz B-Class fails more often than other build years of the same model at the same age.

Mercedes-Benz B-Class built in 2010 at a glance
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Failed first time36.7%all ages tested2019–202428176
Index against this model at the same age (95% CI 104.7–108.8)106.7index100 = normal for this model at that age2019–202428176
Rank among this model's 16 build years15of 161 = fails least for its age2019–202428176
Tested in 20244569testsmedian 86,122 miles20244569
line · Mercedes-Benz B-Class built 2010 · first-time MOT failure share by age · built 2010 32.7% vs model normal 28.2% at age 9 · 2019–2024
Built 2010 against Mercedes-Benz B-Class normal for the age: first-time MOT failure share at each age, age 9: 32.7% vs 28.2%; age 10: 33.6% vs 29.3%; age 11: 35.2% vs 33%; age 12: 37.3% vs 35.2%; age 13: 39.4% vs 39.3%; age 14: 41.9% vs 40.8%. Axis from 0% to 50%. DVSA MOT bulk data, 2019–2024.

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · page updated 30 Sep 2026 · full dataset (v5).

How does the 2010 Mercedes-Benz B-Class fail at each age?

Cars built in 2010 were tested at ages 9 to 14 between 2019 and 2024. Each row compares their first-time failure share with what this model normally shows at that age, after allowing for the overall failure level of each test year.

Mercedes-Benz B-Class built 2010: first-time MOT failure by age, against the model's normal rate at that age (2019–2024)
AgeTestsFailed, %95% intervalNormal for this model at that age, %Index (100 = normal)
94,49832.731.3–34.128.2115.8
104,21733.632.1–3529.3114.6
115,04535.233.9–36.633106.7
125,01437.335.9–38.635.2105.8
134,83339.438.1–40.839.3100.3
144,56941.940.4–43.340.8102.7

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 28,176 (initial tests) · Method: normal rate = this model's first-time failure share at that age across its build years (cells of 400+ tests), adjusted for each test year's overall level; cells of 30+ tests, under 500 marked rough · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What fails most on the 2010 Mercedes-Benz B-Class?

The most common failure group on cars built in 2010 is lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment: 23.7 items per 100 first tests, against 12.5 across all build years of the Mercedes-Benz B-Class. These counts are not age-adjusted: cars built in 2010 were tested at ages 9 to 14.

Failure items per 100 first tests, Mercedes-Benz B-Class built 2010 against the Mercedes-Benz B-Class in all build years (2019–2024, not age-adjusted)
Failure groupBuilt 2010, per 100All build years, per 100Items
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment23.712.56,690
Suspension20.112.45,669
Brakes17.49.84,910
Body, chassis, structure11.56.23,228
Tyres8.88.62,492

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 28,176 (initial tests of this build year) · Method: failure items grouped by DVSA's top-level defect groups, per 100 initial tests; groups with 30+ items · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does 2010 compare with the years around it?

Among the 16 published build years of the Mercedes-Benz B-Class, 2010 ranks 15 (1 = fails least for its age). 2009: index 103.6. 2011: index 116.6.

Mercedes-Benz B-Class build years: index against the model at the same age (2019–2024)
Build yearIndex (100 = normal)95% intervalVerdictTests
200599.294.4–104.0no different (rough estimate)3,756
2006101.198.7–103.5no different16,074
2007101.699.3–103.8no different18,838
2008104.7102.6–106.8worse22,898
2009103.6101.7–105.6worse27,243
2010106.7104.7–108.8worse28,176
2011116.6114.0–119.2worse21,943
201295.393.3–97.3better33,753
201393.691.6–95.5better39,423
2014100.298.3–102.2no different46,572
201594.592.0–96.9better33,910
201698.195.3–100.8no different32,176
201796.993.8–99.9better30,281
2018100.496.0–104.8no different15,953
201985.180.3–89.9better12,587
202086.779.2–94.2better5,645

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 389,228 (initial tests) · Method: observed failures against those expected for the same model at the same ages, test-year level adjusted; verdict follows the printed one-decimal bound · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Mercedes-Benz B-Class 2010 MOT statistics (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 30 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/mercedes-b-class/2010/

How every figure is calculated: methodology. Age, test year and build year are tied together (age = test year − build year), so the test-year level is taken as observed, not estimated.

Other pages for this model

Mercedes-Benz B-Class 2005 · Mercedes-Benz B-Class 2006 · Mercedes-Benz B-Class 2007 · Mercedes-Benz B-Class 2008 · Mercedes-Benz B-Class 2009 · Mercedes-Benz B-Class 2011 · Mercedes-Benz B-Class 2012 · Mercedes-Benz B-Class 2013 · Mercedes-Benz B-Class 2014 · Mercedes-Benz B-Class 2015 · Mercedes-Benz B-Class 2016 · Mercedes-Benz B-Class 2017 · Mercedes-Benz B-Class 2018 · Mercedes-Benz B-Class 2019 · Mercedes-Benz B-Class 2020 · Mercedes-Benz B-Class in Norway · Mercedes-Benz B-Class in Finland · Mercedes-Benz B-Class in the Netherlands · Mercedes-Benz B-Class by postcode area · Mercedes-Benz B-Class body, chassis and structure failures · Mercedes-Benz B-Class brakes failures · Mercedes-Benz B-Class vehicle identification failures · Mercedes-Benz B-Class lamps, reflectors and electrics failures · Mercedes-Benz B-Class noise, emissions and leaks failures · Mercedes-Benz B-Class road wheels failures · Mercedes-Benz B-Class seat belts and airbags failures · Mercedes-Benz B-Class steering failures · Mercedes-Benz B-Class suspension failures · Mercedes-Benz B-Class tyres failures · Mercedes-Benz B-Class visibility failures