MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Ford Explorer MOT pass rate and common problems

76.9% of Ford Explorers passed the 2024 MOT (a rough estimate from 472 first tests): 72.0% at the first attempt and 4.9% after a fix at the test centre (PRS). About 3 in 10 failed the first attempt. For its age, it fails 21% less often than normal: MOT Risk Index 79.2 (95% CI 68.3–91.1; 100 = normal).

Ford Explorer at a glance, 2024 MOT
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
MOT pass rate76.9%incl. 4.9% fixed at the test centre2024472
Passed at the first attempt72.0%all first tests2024472
MOT Risk Index (95% CI 68.3–91.1)79.2index100 = normal for its age · rank 250 (tied) of 761 (1 = fails least for its age)2024472
Biggest excess: Suspension39.1per 10026.7 same-age2019–20244162
Dangerous defects13.6per 10011.2 UK, not age-adjusted2019–20244162
Advisory items192.1per 100127.1 UK, not age-adjusted2019–20244162
strip · Ford Explorer · MOT Risk Index · 79.2 vs 100 = normal · 2024
MOT Risk Index · Ford Explorer. 0–240; 100 = normal for its age; median model 92.8 · rank 250 (tied) of 761 (1 = fails least for its age). It would rank between 177 and 359 anywhere within its 95% interval, other models held where they are. DVSA, 2024.
Ford Explorer index position among 761 models
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Rank250of 761published models, 1 = fails least for its age2024472
Best rank within its 95% interval177rankother models held where they are2024472
Worst rank within its 95% interval359rankother models held where they are2024472

Check this car by registration

Before you submit. Enter a UK registration to compare this vehicle with similar cars. We send the registration to the DVSA MOT History API, do not put it in the URL or send it to analytics, and keep any server-side cache for no more than 15 minutes. MOT history is free on GOV.UK; we do not sell it. Statistical information, not vehicle condition advice. Read how we use your data.

Download this page's numbers (CSV) · How to cite

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · full dataset (v5). This model's index changed from 76.5 to 79.2 in the 24 September 2026 release, after duplicate test records were removed.

What actually fails on a Ford Explorer MOT, and how often?

Ford Explorer MOTs fail most often on suspension: 39.1 per 100 tests, against 26.7 for UK cars of the same age (2019–2024, n = 4,162).

bar · Ford Explorer · Suspension · 39.1 vs 26.7 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Suspension39.1per 10026.72019–20241629
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment33.1per 10032.42019–20241378
Brakes23.5per 10021.52019–2024976
Body, chassis, structure14.2per 10014.62019–2024590
Visibility10.8per 10011.92019–2024451
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems6.6per 1003.62019–2024273

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 4,162 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Will my Ford Explorer's advisory become a fail at the next MOT?

Ford Explorer advisories turn into fails more often than on the median model: suspension advisories became a fail at the next MOT 28.4% of the time.

funnel · Ford Explorer · Suspension · 28.4 vs median model · 2019–2024
Advisories on suspension: 28.4 of 100 became a fail on the same item at the next MOT. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Suspension28.4% next failmedian model2019–2024832
Brakes16.7% next failmedian model2019–2024807

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

My Ford Explorer got an MOT advisory: what gets flagged most?

Ford Explorer MOTs flag suspension most: 55.8 advisories per 100 tests, against 26.2 across UK tests (2019–2024, n = 4,162).

bar · Ford Explorer · Suspension · 55.8 vs 26.2 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Suspension55.8per 10026.22019–20242324
Brakes50.6per 10034.72019–20242105
Tyres26.7per 10039.72019–20241113
Body, chassis, structure21.9per 1004.62019–2024911
Non-component advisories9.8per 1007.82019–2024408
Noise, emissions and leaks9.7per 1005.22019–2024403

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 4,162 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What is likely to fail next on a Ford Explorer?

For Ford Explorers aged 20 or older whose last MOT was a fail, the item most likely to fail at the next MOT is suspension: 24.1% failed on it (2019–2024, n = 634).

bar · Ford Explorer · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 80 cars) · 10 vs baseline · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 80 cars)10% next fail2019–202480
Visibility, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 80 cars)8.8% next fail2019–202480
Suspension, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 80 cars)6.3% next fail2019–202480
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 49 cars)18.4% next fail2019–202449
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 56 cars)10.7% next fail2019–202456
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 56 cars)8.9% next fail2019–202456
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 46 cars)26.1% next fail2019–202446
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 46 cars)19.6% next fail2019–202446
Full table
Further values · 2019–2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 46 cars)10.9% next fail2019–202446
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 46 cars)10.9% next fail2019–202446
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 283 cars)14.1% next fail2019–2024283
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 283 cars)11.3% next fail2019–2024283
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 283 cars)7.4% next fail2019–2024283
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 283 cars)5.0% next fail2019–2024283
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 283 cars)4.6% next fail2019–2024283
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 283 cars)2.8% next fail2019–2024283
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 283 cars)2.8% next fail2019–2024283
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 283 cars)2.8% next fail2019–2024283
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 227 cars)29.1% next fail2019–2024227
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 227 cars)24.2% next fail2019–2024227
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 227 cars)12.8% next fail2019–2024227
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 227 cars)11.9% next fail2019–2024227
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 227 cars)7.9% next fail2019–2024227
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 227 cars)5.3% next fail2019–2024227
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 227 cars)4.0% next fail2019–2024227
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 227 cars)3.1% next fail2019–2024227
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 269 cars)26.8% next fail2019–2024269
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 269 cars)20.1% next fail2019–2024269
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 269 cars)18.2% next fail2019–2024269
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 269 cars)12.6% next fail2019–2024269
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 269 cars)8.2% next fail2019–2024269
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 269 cars)4.5% next fail2019–2024269
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 269 cars)3.7% next fail2019–2024269
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 269 cars)3.7% next fail2019–2024269
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 269 cars)2.2% next fail2019–2024269
Suspension, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 468 cars)15.6% next fail2019–2024468
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 468 cars)12.4% next fail2019–2024468
Brakes, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 468 cars)9.0% next fail2019–2024468
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 468 cars)7.9% next fail2019–2024468
Visibility, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 468 cars)6.2% next fail2019–2024468
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 468 cars)3.0% next fail2019–2024468
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 468 cars)2.8% next fail2019–2024468
Steering, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 468 cars)2.8% next fail2019–2024468
Tyres, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 468 cars)1.5% next fail2019–2024468
Suspension, 20 years or older, after an advisory27.7% next fail2019–2024585
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after an advisory21.4% next fail2019–2024585
Brakes, 20 years or older, after an advisory15.7% next fail2019–2024585
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after an advisory13.2% next fail2019–2024585
Visibility, 20 years or older, after an advisory9.4% next fail2019–2024585
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after an advisory5.8% next fail2019–2024585
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after an advisory5.5% next fail2019–2024585
Steering, 20 years or older, after an advisory5.5% next fail2019–2024585
Tyres, 20 years or older, after an advisory2.1% next fail2019–2024585
Identification of the vehicle, 20 years or older, after an advisory0.9% next fail2019–2024585
Suspension, 20 years or older, after a fail24.1% next fail2019–2024634
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after a fail23.8% next fail2019–2024634
Brakes, 20 years or older, after a fail19.6% next fail2019–2024634
Visibility, 20 years or older, after a fail13.1% next fail2019–2024634
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after a fail12.9% next fail2019–2024634
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after a fail7.3% next fail2019–2024634
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after a fail6.8% next fail2019–2024634
Steering, 20 years or older, after a fail5.5% next fail2019–2024634
Tyres, 20 years or older, after a fail3.5% next fail2019–2024634

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How often does a Ford Explorer get a dangerous MOT defect?

The Ford Explorer gets a dangerous defect more often than the UK average: 13.6 per 100 first tests against 11.2 across the UK. A dangerous defect means the vehicle should not be driven away until it is fixed. In the same tests, 96.4 major and 32.6 minor defects were recorded per 100 tests (one test can record several).

bullet · Ford Explorer · Dangerous defects · 13.6 vs 11.2 · 2019–2024
Dangerous defects: 13.6 vs 11.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Dangerous defects13.6per 10011.22019–20244162

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 4,162 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id; severity not recorded for some 2018–2021 tests · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does the Ford Explorer compare with cars of its own age and size?

At every age shown, Ford Explorers fail first time more often than comparable models of the same size class; the biggest difference is at age 20, where they fail more often: 38.5% against 37.0% (2024, n = 447).

line · Ford Explorer · Age 19 · 38.5 vs 37.5 · 2024
Age 19: 38.5. Age 20: 38.5. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 1938.5% fail37.52024335
Age 2038.5% fail37.02024447

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How much does it cost to fix a Ford Explorer MOT fail?

Expected repair cost per Ford Explorer MOT: about £152 (up to about £289 if more expensive parts are needed), from the chance of failing each item and its most common UK repair price (catalogue estimate, n = 472).

Computed, not measured.

bar · Ford Explorer · Expected repair bill · 152.0 vs modal price catalogue · price catalogue
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (price catalogue)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Expected repair bill152.0GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue472
Estimated range lower152.0GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue472
Estimated range upper288.7GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue472
Suspension: Suspension coil spring (single corner)70.4GBP expected contribution180price catalogue472
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment: Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)46.3GBP expected contribution140price catalogue472
Brakes: Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)35.3GBP expected contribution150price catalogue472

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: price catalogue · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the Ford Explorer more reliable than similar cars?

Of 8 similar models, 4 fail less often for their age than the Ford Explorer and 4 as often or more. The Ford Explorer has an MOT Risk Index of 79.2, where 100 = normal for its age (2024, n = 472).

bar · Ford Explorer · Ford Explorer (this model) · 79.2 vs 100 = normal · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Ford Explorer (this model)79.2index100 = normal2024472
Mercedes-Benz 32077.3index79.22024493
Toyota Highlander80.7index79.22024745
Honda Odyssey74.2index79.22024680
Nissan Patrol76.2index79.220241013
Mercedes-Benz ML70.6index79.22024593
Honda Elysion88.2index79.22024724
Chrysler Crossfire79.4index79.220241930
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Mercedes-Benz 22088.7index79.22024778

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does high mileage mean more Ford Explorer MOT failures at the same age?

At ages 15+, 29.2% of Ford Explorers with 70,000 to 100,000 miles failed first time, against 31.5% of those with 100,000 to 140,000 miles (2024, n = 126). No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.

bar · Ford Explorer · Age 15+, 70-100k miles (rough estimate: 72 tests, 95% interval 19.9–40.5%) · 29.2 vs baseline · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 15+, 70-100k miles (rough estimate: 72 tests, 95% interval 19.9–40.5%)29.2% failed first time202472
Age 15+, 100-140k miles (rough estimate: 54 tests, 95% interval 20.7–44.7%)31.5% failed first time202454

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many miles does a Ford Explorer last?

47.0% of Ford Explorers tested had reached 100,000 miles, and 10.8% had reached 150,000 (2024, n = 1,941).

line · Ford Explorer · 100,000 miles · 47.0 vs baseline · 2024
100,000 miles: 47.0. 200,000 miles (rou: 1.9. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
100,000 miles47.0% of tested cars20241941
150,000 miles (rough estimate: 446 tests, 95% interval 9.9–11.8%)10.8% of tested cars2024446
200,000 miles (rough estimate: 80 tests, 95% interval 1.6–2.4%)1.9% of tested cars202480

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the Ford Explorer driven more or less than average, and does that change the picture?

Matched on annual mileage as well as age, the Ford Explorer index is 89.2, against 91.0 on age alone (2019–2024, n = 472).

slope · Ford Explorer · Age and mileage adjusted index · 89.2 vs 91 · 2019–2024
Age and mileage adjusted index: 91 vs 89.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age and mileage adjusted index89.2index912019–2024472

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Where in Britain does the Ford Explorer fail its MOT most?

Ford Explorer fails first-time MOTs most in Tonbridge (TN): 48.2% against 35.0% across Britain for this model, both 2019–2024 (2024, n = 110).

bar · Ford Explorer · Tonbridge (TN) (rough estimate: 110 tests, 95% interval 39.1–57.4%) · 48.2 vs 28.0 · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Tonbridge (TN) (rough estimate: 110 tests, 95% interval 39.1–57.4%)48.2% fail first time28.02024110
Chelmsford (CM) (rough estimate: 112 tests, 95% interval 29.9–47.6%)38.4% fail first time28.02024112
Peterborough (PE) (rough estimate: 110 tests, 95% interval 28.8–46.6%)37.3% fail first time28.02024110
Ipswich (IP) (rough estimate: 291 tests, 95% interval 24.3–34.7%)29.2% fail first time28.02024291
Southend-on-Sea (SS) (rough estimate: 114 tests, 95% interval 20.6–36.9%)28.1% fail first time28.02024114

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does a Ford Explorer rust more than average?

Allowing for age, Ford Explorer MOTs record corrosion failures at 1.1 times the national rate: 0.86% of tests against 0.77% (2024 + geographic layers, n = 290).

Computed, not measured.

slope · Ford Explorer · Salt belt susceptibility · 1.1 vs 1 · 2024 + geographic layers
Salt belt susceptibility: 1 vs 1.1. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (2024 + geographic layers)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Salt belt susceptibility1.1ratio estimate12024 + geographic layers290

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 + geographic layers · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What do six years of MOTs show about owning a Ford Explorer?

Of failed Ford Explorer MOTs, 19.2% were retested the same day and a further 66.4% within 10 days; the median failed car passed its retest after 4 days (2019–2024, n = 733).

bar · Ford Explorer · Same-day retest · 19.2 vs failed initial tests · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Same-day retest19.2%failed initial tests2019–2024733
Retest within 10 days66.4%failed initial tests2019–2024733
Clean MOT streak27.9%observed chains2019–2024717
Repeat advisory39.6%observed chains2019–2024717
Decreasing odometer10.8% mileage anomalyobserved chains2019–2024901

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many years is a Ford Explorer likely to last?

Ford Explorers aged 5 are forecast to keep taking MOTs for at least 13.7 more years; the survival curve is observed only until age 19, so the true figure is likely higher.

Computed, not measured.

Forecast, not a prediction for a particular car.

bar · Ford Explorer · Age 5 (at least; observed only until age 19) · 13.7 vs baseline · survival forecast
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (survival forecast)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 5 (at least; observed only until age 19)13.7years forecastsurvival forecast0
Age 15 (at least; observed only until age 19)4.5years forecastsurvival forecast0

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: survival forecast · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Ford Explorers are still on the road?

Ford Explorer: Age 3 (at least as many as at ages 4–6) (rough estimate: 72 tests, 95% interval 19.9–40.5%) is 100 % of age 4–6 baseline, against the relevant comparison (2024, n = 472).

line · Ford Explorer · Age 3 (at least as many as at ages 4–6) (rough estimate: 72 tests, 95% interval 19.9–40.5%) · 100 vs baseline · 2024
Age 3 (at least as: 100. Age 19 (at least a: 100. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 3 (at least as many as at ages 4–6) (rough estimate: 72 tests, 95% interval 19.9–40.5%)100% of age 4–6 baseline202472
Age 4 (at least as many as at ages 4–6) (rough estimate: 72 tests, 95% interval 16.4–36.1%)100% of age 4–6 baseline202472
Age 5 (at least as many as at ages 4–6) (rough estimate: 81 tests, 95% interval 20.8–40.3%)100% of age 4–6 baseline202481
Age 6 (rough estimate: 57 tests, 95% interval 18.1–40.8%)81.4% of age 4–6 baseline202457
Age 14 (at least as many as at ages 4–6) (rough estimate: 71 tests, 95% interval 21.4–42.5%)100% of age 4–6 baseline202471
Age 15 (at least as many as at ages 4–6) (rough estimate: 102 tests, 95% interval 21.4–38.9%)100% of age 4–6 baseline2024102
Age 16 (at least as many as at ages 4–6) (rough estimate: 109 tests, 95% interval 25.7–43.3%)100% of age 4–6 baseline2024109
Age 17 (at least as many as at ages 4–6) (rough estimate: 123 tests, 95% interval 23.4–39.5%)100% of age 4–6 baseline2024123
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 18 (at least as many as at ages 4–6) (rough estimate: 136 tests, 95% interval 23.1–38.3%)100% of age 4–6 baseline2024136
Age 19 (at least as many as at ages 4–6)100% of age 4–6 baseline2024335

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

If a Ford Explorer fails, does it fail again?

26.8% of Ford Explorers that failed an MOT failed the next one too, against 28.9% after a pass (2019–2024, n = 489). The failure most likely to come back is visibility: 31.1% of those fails recurred at the next MOT.

bullet · Ford Explorer · Repeat after fail · 26.8 vs 28.9 · 2019–2024
Repeat after fail: 26.8 vs 28.9. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Repeat after fail26.8%28.92019–2024489

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Ford Explorer faults come together?

On Ford Explorers, ‘body, chassis, structure’ and ‘noise, emissions and leaks’ failures turn up together 4.9 times as often as chance would predict (2024, n = 80).

Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Body, chassis, structure + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 80 tests, 95% interval 3.9–6.1)4.9liftexpected joint rate202480
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Steering (rough estimate: 30 tests, 95% interval 3.0–6.4)4.5liftexpected joint rate202430
Body, chassis, structure + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 62 tests, 95% interval 2.9–4.8)3.8liftexpected joint rate202462
Noise, emissions and leaks + Steering (rough estimate: 24 tests, 95% interval 2.3–5.4)3.6liftexpected joint rate202424
Brakes + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 89 tests, 95% interval 2.9–4.5)3.6liftexpected joint rate202489
Brakes + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 87 tests, 95% interval 2.9–4.4)3.6liftexpected joint rate202487
Noise, emissions and leaks + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 28 tests, 95% interval 2.4–5.1)3.5liftexpected joint rate202428
Body, chassis, structure + Brakes (rough estimate: 165 tests, 95% interval 2.8–3.8)3.3liftexpected joint rate2024165
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Body, chassis, structure + Steering (rough estimate: 42 tests, 95% interval 2.2–4.2)3.1liftexpected joint rate202442
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Tyres (rough estimate: 64 tests, 95% interval 2.4–3.9)3.0liftexpected joint rate202464
Body, chassis, structure + Tyres (rough estimate: 29 tests, 95% interval 2.0–4.4)3.0liftexpected joint rate202429
Brakes + Tyres (rough estimate: 42 tests, 95% interval 2.1–4.0)3.0liftexpected joint rate202442
Tyres + Visibility (rough estimate: 27 tests, 95% interval 1.9–4.2)2.9liftexpected joint rate202427
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 102 tests, 95% interval 2.3–3.5)2.9liftexpected joint rate2024102
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 103 tests, 95% interval 2.3–3.4)2.8liftexpected joint rate2024103
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Suspension (rough estimate: 95 tests, 95% interval 2.0–3.1)2.5liftexpected joint rate202495
Brakes + Suspension (rough estimate: 286 tests, 95% interval 2.2–2.8)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024286
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Steering (rough estimate: 74 tests, 95% interval 1.9–3.1)2.5liftexpected joint rate202474
Noise, emissions and leaks + Visibility (rough estimate: 39 tests, 95% interval 1.8–3.4)2.5liftexpected joint rate202439
Brakes + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (rough estimate: 272 tests, 95% interval 2.2–2.8)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024272
Brakes + Steering (rough estimate: 50 tests, 95% interval 1.8–3.2)2.5liftexpected joint rate202450
Suspension + Tyres (rough estimate: 53 tests, 95% interval 1.8–3.2)2.4liftexpected joint rate202453
Body, chassis, structure + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (rough estimate: 180 tests, 95% interval 2.1–2.8)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024180
Noise, emissions and leaks + Suspension (rough estimate: 89 tests, 95% interval 1.9–3.0)2.4liftexpected joint rate202489
Steering + Suspension (rough estimate: 75 tests, 95% interval 1.9–3.0)2.4liftexpected joint rate202475
Body, chassis, structure + Suspension (rough estimate: 183 tests, 95% interval 2.0–2.8)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024183
Brakes + Visibility (rough estimate: 116 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.8)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024116
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Visibility (rough estimate: 167 tests, 95% interval 2.0–2.7)2.3liftexpected joint rate2024167
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Visibility (rough estimate: 36 tests, 95% interval 1.6–3.1)2.2liftexpected joint rate202436
Steering + Visibility (rough estimate: 30 tests, 95% interval 1.5–3.2)2.2liftexpected joint rate202430
Body, chassis, structure + Visibility (rough estimate: 73 tests, 95% interval 1.7–2.8)2.2liftexpected joint rate202473
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Suspension (rough estimate: 362 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.4)2.1liftexpected joint rate2024362
Suspension + Visibility (rough estimate: 148 tests, 95% interval 1.7–2.3)2.0liftexpected joint rate2024148
Steering + Tyres (seen together; too few for a multiplier)17tests with both202417
Noise, emissions and leaks + Tyres (seen together; too few for a multiplier)17tests with both202417
Identification of the vehicle + Suspension (seen together; too few for a multiplier)15tests with both202415
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Tyres (seen together; too few for a multiplier)14tests with both202414
Identification of the vehicle + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (seen together; too few for a multiplier)12tests with both202412
Brakes + Identification of the vehicle (seen together; too few for a multiplier)9tests with both20249
Body, chassis, structure + Identification of the vehicle (seen together; too few for a multiplier)8tests with both20248
Identification of the vehicle + Visibility (seen together; too few for a multiplier)7tests with both20247
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Road Wheels (seen together; too few for a multiplier)6tests with both20246
Road Wheels + Suspension (seen together; too few for a multiplier)6tests with both20246
Identification of the vehicle + Noise, emissions and leaks (seen together; too few for a multiplier)5tests with both20245

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Has the Ford Explorer had safety recalls?

DVSA lists 22 safety recall campaigns matched to the Ford Explorer; check whether yours has been fixed, using its registration number.

Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (DVSA register)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
DVSA recall campaigns matched22campaignsDVSA registerDVSA register472

Source: DVSA register; recall effect covers 11 of 761 models · Window: DVSA register · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What have dealers been told about the Ford Explorer? (US market)

NHTSA lists 430 US technical service bulletins for the Ford Explorer (US market, Ford EXPLORER, model years 2020–2022 only); a count, not a UK failure rate.

bar · Ford Explorer · US service bulletins · 430 vs NHTSA · NHTSA
NHTSA, US market, Ford EXPLORER, model years 2020–2022 only; covers 211 of 761 models, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (NHTSA)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
US service bulletins430bulletinsNHTSANHTSA472
Year 20197bulletinsNHTSANHTSA472
Year 202078bulletinsNHTSANHTSA472
Year 202185bulletinsNHTSANHTSA472
Year 202274bulletinsNHTSANHTSA472
Year 202371bulletinsNHTSANHTSA472
Year 202441bulletinsNHTSANHTSA472
Year 202539bulletinsNHTSANHTSA472
Full table
Further values · NHTSA
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Year 202635bulletinsNHTSANHTSA472

Source: NHTSA, US market, Ford EXPLORER, model years 2020–2022 only; covers 211 of 761 models · Window: NHTSA · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What do owners complain about? (US market)

The most common US owner complaint about the Ford Explorer to NHTSA concerns transmission (not MOT-tested): 667 complaints (US market, Ford EXPLORER, model years 2020–2022 only).

bar · Ford Explorer · Transmission (not MOT-tested) · 667 vs baseline · NHTSA + 2024
NHTSA, US market, Ford EXPLORER, model years 2020–2022 only; covers 211 of 761 models, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (NHTSA + 2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Transmission (not MOT-tested)667complaintsNHTSA + 2024667
Lamps & electrical330complaintsNHTSA + 2024330
Engine (not MOT-tested)224complaintsNHTSA + 2024224
Visibility139complaintsNHTSA + 2024139
Brakes117complaintsNHTSA + 2024117
Body & structure77complaintsNHTSA + 202477

Source: NHTSA, US market, Ford EXPLORER, model years 2020–2022 only; covers 211 of 761 models · Window: NHTSA + 2024 · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does the Ford Explorer fail inspections in other countries too?

In Norway, 18.5% of Ford Explorers failed their periodic roadworthiness inspection, against 33.7% for all cars there (2024 by country, n = 703 inspections).

Inspections abroad point the same way: in Norway and the Netherlands the Ford Explorer also fails less often than the national average.

bullet · Ford Explorer · Norway · 18.5 vs 33.7 · 2024 by country
Norway: 18.5 vs 33.7. Netherlands: 47.4 vs 50.8. Statens vegvesen PKK (CC BY 4.0), Traficom Katsastus (CC BY 4.0), RDW APK (CC0), adapted; covers 430 of 761 models, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (2024 by country)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Norway18.5% failed33.72024 by country703
Netherlands47.4% failed50.82024 by country578

Source: Statens vegvesen PKK (CC BY 4.0), Traficom Katsastus (CC BY 4.0), RDW APK (CC0), adapted; covers 430 of 761 models · Window: 2024 by country · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV · licences and full notice

Does the month of a Ford Explorer MOT matter?

Ford Explorers fail first time most in February (41.2%, against 30.0% for all cars that month) and least in September (31.0%) (2024, n = 472).

line · Ford Explorer · January · 35.7 vs 31.1 · 2024
January: 35.7. December: 32.4. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Ford Explorer: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
January35.7% fail first time31.12024387
February41.2% fail first time30.02024294
March34.7% fail first time28.32024331
April32.8% fail first time29.82024293
May36.2% fail first time28.82024298
June33.0% fail first time28.12024282
July36.9% fail first time29.32024333
August39.0% fail first time29.22024331
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
September31.0% fail first time28.22024394
October34.6% fail first time30.32024416
November34.0% fail first time30.62024429
December32.4% fail first time29.32024374

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Not enough tests for… (and why)

Real-world MPG against the official figure (manufacturer level)

layer not yet computed for this model (covers 19 of 761 models). 472 initial Ford Explorer tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: European Commission OBFCM; covers 19 of 761 models · Window: 2021+ cohorts · n = 472 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

See the Chrysler Crossfire, a car of the same inspection class with 4.1× the tests · Check your car by registration

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Ford Explorer MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 24 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/ford-explorer/

How the MOT Risk Index and every figure on this page are calculated: methodology.

Report an error

What is wrong on this page? One tap sends the category only, no text and nothing about you.

Ford Explorer MOT: quick answers

What is the Ford Explorer first-time MOT pass rate?

72.0% of first attempts passed in 2024 (472 tests). Retests after repair are excluded; cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) are shown separately.

Why does this number differ from other sites?

Other sites may count retests or all attempts. This page uses 472 primary tests: 27.97% failed first time and 76.9% passed when cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) count as passes. The age-adjusted MOT Risk Index 79.2 is shown separately.