MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Citroen Nemo 2016: MOT failure rate for its age

33.4% of 6,622 MOT tests of the Citroen Nemo first registered in 2016 failed at the first attempt (2019–2024; retests excluded). Against this model's own normal rate at the same ages the index is 99.7 (95% CI 95.6–103.9; 100 = normal for this model at that age): the 2016 build year is no different from other years of the same model at the same age.

Citroen Nemo built in 2016 at a glance
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Failed first time33.4%all ages tested2019–20246622
Index against this model at the same age (95% CI 95.6–103.9)99.7index100 = normal for this model at that age2019–20246622
Rank among this model's 11 build years5of 111 = fails least for its age2019–20246622
Tested in 20241013testsmedian 83,593 miles20241013
line · Citroen Nemo built 2016 · first-time MOT failure share by age · built 2016 27.8% vs model normal 29.2% at age 3 · 2019–2024
Built 2016 against Citroen Nemo normal for the age: first-time MOT failure share at each age, age 3: 27.8% vs 29.2%; age 4: 28.7% vs 29.4%; age 5: 32% vs 32.8%; age 6: 34.3% vs 34.6%; age 7: 40.6% vs 37.1%; age 8: 37.9% vs 38.8%. Axis from 0% to 50%. DVSA MOT bulk data, 2019–2024.
Check a 2016 Citroen Nemo by registration · All Citroen Nemo MOT statistics · Download the build-year table (CSV)

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · page updated 30 Sep 2026 · full dataset (v5).

How does the 2016 Citroen Nemo fail at each age?

Cars built in 2016 were tested at ages 3 to 8 between 2019 and 2024. Each row compares their first-time failure share with what this model normally shows at that age, after allowing for the overall failure level of each test year.

Citroen Nemo built 2016: first-time MOT failure by age, against the model's normal rate at that age (2019–2024)
AgeTestsFailed, %95% intervalNormal for this model at that age, %Index (100 = normal)
31,18127.825.3–30.429.295
41,10828.726.1–31.429.497.6
51,1363229.4–34.832.897.8
61,10434.331.6–37.234.699.4
71,08040.637.8–43.637.1109.6
81,01337.935–40.938.897.7

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 6,622 (initial tests) · Method: normal rate = this model's first-time failure share at that age across its build years (cells of 400+ tests), adjusted for each test year's overall level; cells of 30+ tests, under 500 marked rough · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What fails most on the 2016 Citroen Nemo?

The most common failure group on cars built in 2016 is suspension: 18.8 items per 100 first tests, against 30.5 across all build years of the Citroen Nemo. These counts are not age-adjusted: cars built in 2016 were tested at ages 3 to 8.

Failure items per 100 first tests, Citroen Nemo built 2016 against the Citroen Nemo in all build years (2019–2024, not age-adjusted)
Failure groupBuilt 2016, per 100All build years, per 100Items
Suspension18.830.51,243
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment15.728.11,039
Visibility15.118.11,003
Tyres12.913.2856
Brakes68.5400

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 6,622 (initial tests of this build year) · Method: failure items grouped by DVSA's top-level defect groups, per 100 initial tests; groups with 30+ items · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does 2016 compare with the years around it?

Among the 11 published build years of the Citroen Nemo, 2016 ranks 5 (1 = fails least for its age). 2015: index 100.4. 2017: index 102.2.

Citroen Nemo build years: index against the model at the same age (2019–2024)
Build yearIndex (100 = normal)95% intervalVerdictTests
2008106.9102.3–111.6worse4,256
200999.797.4–102.0no different16,614
201099.597.2–101.8no different16,425
201194.791.6–97.8better9,066
2012100.697.6–103.6no different10,379
2013101.698.4–104.7no different9,985
201499.396.3–102.4no different11,082
2015100.497.3–103.5no different11,246
201699.795.6–103.9no different6,622
2017102.295.3–109.1no different (rough estimate)2,608
2018107.793.3–122.1no different (rough estimate)657

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 98,940 (initial tests) · Method: observed failures against those expected for the same model at the same ages, test-year level adjusted; verdict follows the printed one-decimal bound · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Citroen Nemo 2016 MOT statistics (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 30 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/citroen-nemo/2016/

How every figure is calculated: methodology. Age, test year and build year are tied together (age = test year − build year), so the test-year level is taken as observed, not estimated.

Other pages for this model

Citroen Nemo 2008 · Citroen Nemo 2009 · Citroen Nemo 2010 · Citroen Nemo 2011 · Citroen Nemo 2012 · Citroen Nemo 2013 · Citroen Nemo 2014 · Citroen Nemo 2015 · Citroen Nemo 2017 · Citroen Nemo 2018 · Citroen Nemo in the Netherlands · Citroen Nemo by postcode area · Citroen Nemo body, chassis and structure failures · Citroen Nemo brakes failures · Citroen Nemo vehicle identification failures · Citroen Nemo lamps, reflectors and electrics failures · Citroen Nemo noise, emissions and leaks failures · Citroen Nemo road wheels failures · Citroen Nemo seat belts and airbags failures · Citroen Nemo steering failures · Citroen Nemo suspension failures · Citroen Nemo tyres failures · Citroen Nemo visibility failures