Seat Ateca 2019: MOT failure rate for its age

9.6% of 33,118 MOT tests of the Seat Ateca first registered in 2019 failed at the first attempt (2019–2024; retests excluded). Against this model's own normal rate at the same ages the index is 93.7 (95% CI 90.4–96.9; 100 = normal for this model at that age): the 2019 Seat Ateca fails less often than other build years of the same model at the same age.

Seat Ateca built in 2019 at a glance
Measure	Value	Unit	Compared with	Years	Tests
Failed first time	9.6	%	all ages tested	2019–2024	33118
Index against this model at the same age (95% CI 90.4–96.9)	93.7	index	100 = normal for this model at that age	2019–2024	33118
Rank among this model's 5 build years	2	of 5	1 = fails least for its age	2019–2024	33118
Tested in 2024	10832	tests	median 38,890 miles	2024	10832

Built 2019 against Seat Ateca normal for the age: first-time MOT failure share at each age, age 3: 8.8% vs 10%; age 4: 9.9% vs 10.3%; age 5: 10.3% vs 10.6%. Axis from 0% to 20%. DVSA MOT bulk data, 2019–2024.

Check a 2019 Seat Ateca by registration · All Seat Ateca MOT statistics · Download the build-year table (CSV)

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · page updated 30 Sep 2026 · full dataset (v5).

How does the 2019 Seat Ateca fail at each age?

Cars built in 2019 were tested at ages 3 to 5 between 2019 and 2024. Each row compares their first-time failure share with what this model normally shows at that age, after allowing for the overall failure level of each test year.

Seat Ateca built 2019: first-time MOT failure by age, against the model's normal rate at that age (2019–2024)
Age	Tests	Failed, %	95% interval	Normal for this model at that age, %	Index (100 = normal)
3	11,285	8.8	8.2–9.3	10	87.7
4	11,001	9.9	9.3–10.4	10.3	96.1
5	10,832	10.3	9.8–10.9	10.6	97.2

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 33,118 (initial tests) · Method: normal rate = this model's first-time failure share at that age across its build years (cells of 400+ tests), adjusted for each test year's overall level; cells of 30+ tests, under 500 marked rough · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What fails most on the 2019 Seat Ateca?

The most common failure group on cars built in 2019 is tyres: 5.4 items per 100 first tests, against 5.6 across all build years of the Seat Ateca. These counts are not age-adjusted: cars built in 2019 were tested at ages 3 to 5.

Failure items per 100 first tests, Seat Ateca built 2019 against the Seat Ateca in all build years (2019–2024, not age-adjusted)
Failure group	Built 2019, per 100	All build years, per 100	Items
Tyres	5.4	5.6	1,807
Visibility	3.3	4.5	1,116
Brakes	1.8	2.7	595
Suspension	1.2	0.8	402
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment	1	1.3	338

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 33,597 (initial tests of this build year) · Method: failure items grouped by DVSA's top-level defect groups, per 100 initial tests; groups with 30+ items · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does 2019 compare with the years around it?

Among the 5 published build years of the Seat Ateca, 2019 ranks 2 (1 = fails least for its age). 2018: index 111.3. 2020: index 95.2.

Seat Ateca build years: index against the model at the same age (2019–2024)
Build year	Index (100 = normal)	95% interval	Verdict	Tests
2016	92.4	87.3–97.5	better	11,347
2017	104.2	101.6–106.8	worse	51,211
2018	111.3	108.0–114.6	worse	36,424
2019	93.7	90.4–96.9	better	33,118
2020	95.2	90.4–100.0	no different	15,838

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 147,938 (initial tests) · Method: observed failures against those expected for the same model at the same ages, test-year level adjusted; verdict follows the printed one-decimal bound · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Seat Ateca 2019 MOT statistics (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 30 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/seat-ateca/2019/

How every figure is calculated: methodology. Age, test year and build year are tied together (age = test year − build year), so the test-year level is taken as observed, not estimated.

Other pages for this model