MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Nissan Pulsar 2016: MOT failure rate for its age

17.6% of 37,640 MOT tests of the Nissan Pulsar first registered in 2016 failed at the first attempt (2019–2024; retests excluded). Against this model's own normal rate at the same ages the index is 100.4 (95% CI 98.0–102.8; 100 = normal for this model at that age): the 2016 build year is no different from other years of the same model at the same age.

Nissan Pulsar built in 2016 at a glance
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Failed first time17.6%all ages tested2019–202437640
Index against this model at the same age (95% CI 98.0–102.8)100.4index100 = normal for this model at that age2019–202437640
Rank among this model's 5 build years3of 51 = fails least for its age2019–202437640
Tested in 20246153testsmedian 54,489 miles20246153
line · Nissan Pulsar built 2016 · first-time MOT failure share by age · built 2016 11.3% vs model normal 10.9% at age 3 · 2019–2024
Built 2016 against Nissan Pulsar normal for the age: first-time MOT failure share at each age, age 3: 11.3% vs 10.9%; age 4: 12.9% vs 12.1%; age 5: 14.4% vs 14.6%; age 6: 18.9% vs 18%; age 7: 22.8% vs 22.8%; age 8: 26% vs 27.5%. Axis from 0% to 30%. DVSA MOT bulk data, 2019–2024.

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · page updated 30 Sep 2026 · full dataset (v5).

How does the 2016 Nissan Pulsar fail at each age?

Cars built in 2016 were tested at ages 3 to 8 between 2019 and 2024. Each row compares their first-time failure share with what this model normally shows at that age, after allowing for the overall failure level of each test year.

Nissan Pulsar built 2016: first-time MOT failure by age, against the model's normal rate at that age (2019–2024)
AgeTestsFailed, %95% intervalNormal for this model at that age, %Index (100 = normal)
36,55411.310.6–12.110.9104.3
46,22312.912.1–13.712.1106.2
56,23814.413.6–15.314.698.8
66,24418.917.9–19.918104.7
76,22822.821.8–23.822.899.8
86,1532624.9–27.127.594.7

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 37,640 (initial tests) · Method: normal rate = this model's first-time failure share at that age across its build years (cells of 400+ tests), adjusted for each test year's overall level; cells of 30+ tests, under 500 marked rough · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What fails most on the 2016 Nissan Pulsar?

The most common failure group on cars built in 2016 is tyres: 7.7 items per 100 first tests, against 7.5 across all build years of the Nissan Pulsar. These counts are not age-adjusted: cars built in 2016 were tested at ages 3 to 8.

Failure items per 100 first tests, Nissan Pulsar built 2016 against the Nissan Pulsar in all build years (2019–2024, not age-adjusted)
Failure groupBuilt 2016, per 100All build years, per 100Items
Tyres7.77.52,907
Brakes6.26.82,323
Suspension5.17.41,918
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment4.14.21,526
Visibility2.831,045

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 37,640 (initial tests of this build year) · Method: failure items grouped by DVSA's top-level defect groups, per 100 initial tests; groups with 30+ items · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does 2016 compare with the years around it?

Among the 5 published build years of the Nissan Pulsar, 2016 ranks 3 (1 = fails least for its age). 2015: index 106.0. 2017: index 90.4.

Nissan Pulsar build years: index against the model at the same age (2019–2024)
Build yearIndex (100 = normal)95% intervalVerdictTests
2014105.9101.5–110.4worse8,031
2015106.0104.0–108.0worse45,915
2016100.498.0–102.8no different37,640
201790.487.1–93.7better21,514
201889.784.1–95.4better8,134

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 121,234 (initial tests) · Method: observed failures against those expected for the same model at the same ages, test-year level adjusted; verdict follows the printed one-decimal bound · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Nissan Pulsar 2016 MOT statistics (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 30 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/nissan-pulsar/2016/

How every figure is calculated: methodology. Age, test year and build year are tied together (age = test year − build year), so the test-year level is taken as observed, not estimated.

Other pages for this model

Nissan Pulsar 2014 · Nissan Pulsar 2015 · Nissan Pulsar 2017 · Nissan Pulsar 2018 · Nissan Pulsar in Finland · Nissan Pulsar in the Netherlands · Nissan Pulsar by postcode area · Nissan Pulsar body, chassis and structure failures · Nissan Pulsar brakes failures · Nissan Pulsar vehicle identification failures · Nissan Pulsar lamps, reflectors and electrics failures · Nissan Pulsar noise, emissions and leaks failures · Nissan Pulsar road wheels failures · Nissan Pulsar seat belts and airbags failures · Nissan Pulsar steering failures · Nissan Pulsar suspension failures · Nissan Pulsar tyres failures · Nissan Pulsar visibility failures